English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Flynn’s last nail

Published

on

Flynn’s last nail

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]He is now under Pentagon lens for money received after retirement as US Army general from Russian, Dutch and Turkish interests

By Sujit Bhar

Lt Gen Michael Flynn, a retired US Army general and former National Security Adviser to President Donald Trump, is in more trouble. Apart from his exposed close links and discussions with Russia during the Republican Presidential candidate’s campaign, leading to Flynn’s resignation from his top presidential post, he is now being investigated by a Pentagon body on monies that Flynn had received after retirement as general from Russian, Turkish and Dutch interests.

This does not add credit to Trump’s position as the chief executive of the country, having positioned Flynn in one of the most sensitive government chairs despite protests and warnings from top officials. Little affects ‘duckback’ Trump, but this is a matter national security and a matter of rules being flouted.

All US top brass, including top politicians, up to the level of past Presidents, take up major consultative positions that earn them millions. They write books, do lecture tours and are paid as lobbyists for other countries. This is an accepted norm in that country and nobody raises eyebrows.

However, the situation is a little different for a retired US Army general. The US Constitution’s emoluments clause states that he may be called back to duty in an emergency. Keeping this in mind, the Pentagon advises all retiring army generals to get all foreign monies that he may receive, cleared by it.

Initial findings have indicated that Flynn had taken huge sums of money from Russian, Dutch and Turkish interests.

Now the Pentagon has said, and a Washington Post  report reveals, that Flynn had “received $ 45,000 to appear in 2015 with Russian President Vladimir Putin at a gala dinner for RT, a Kremlin-controlled media organization. He also worked as a foreign agent representing Turkish interests for a Netherlands-based company, which paid him $530,000 last fall.”

Those are big sums of money. And money, especially from Russia, which definitely is not a US “ally”, was sure to be looked upon with suspicion, even if Flynn had not decorated the National Security Adviser post thereafter.

The Democrats are delighted with this find, and the Post report says that on Thursday Democratic representative Elijah E Cummings, who is on the Oversight Committee, released for all an October 8, 2014 letter of the Defense Department that carried a clear warning from a lawyer of the department to Flynn, warning him against taking money from foreign sources without prior permission.

If the reason for Flynn’s sacking from the top government post was not enough—lying to the Vice-President about his connections with Russia and about talking sensitive matters with them—this looks like the last nail in Flynn’s political coffin.

Corruption allegations are something that politicians around the world take in their stride. They are like those minor angina stings that a pill can take care of. Hazards of the profession, they say. However, when it is about national security, and when it involves “Russia”, a country whose position in American eyes is going from bad to worse, there is a possibility of all hell breaking loose.

If that happens, Trump, too, will not remain immune. As it is his public approval rating has been falling over the weeks and his recent executive orders (especially on corporate tax cuts) have received flak from all corners, including the mainline media.

The Post report adds a layer of issues. It says that, according to Flynn’s lawyer Robert K Kelner, Flynn had informed the Defense Intelligence Agency (his department before retirement) before and after that trip. However, it is being said that the problem lies in the money received and not the trip per se. That part was not discussed.

Let us see this in the light of India-Pakistan relations. There have been instances where former Pakistani bureaucrats have earned through work in India. Television Appearances occasionally pay. However, if these were to be done under cover, especially when relation between two countries is at a low, problems are bound to arise.

Financial gratification comes through services rendered. When monies received are large, one would expect large services rendered. Just a gala dinner with President Putin cannot be the basis of a payment.

Hence the probe. Hence the ticking time bomb for President Trump. If he fails to own up to his faults and change his stance, he is sure to be clean bowled.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Latest world news

Trump says Iran getting more serious in talks, no decision yet on major strikes

Donald Trump says Iran is becoming more serious in negotiations with the US but insists no decision has been taken on launching major military strikes against Tehran.

Published

on

Donald Trump

US President Donald Trump has said he has not yet decided whether to authorise major military strikes against Iran, stating that Tehran has become “more serious” in its negotiations with Washington even as tensions between the two countries remain high.

Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office on Friday, Trump said discussions with Iran were continuing and suggested diplomatic efforts were showing signs of progress.

“We’re talking to them right now. I think they’re getting more and more serious as the days go by,” Trump said, adding that no final decision had been taken on launching military action.

Trump says diplomacy remains an option

Trump said the United States remained prepared for military action if required but indicated that ongoing talks could still lead to an agreement.

“We’re locked and loaded and ready to go. But we’re talking to them, so I think while we’re talking, we’ll see what comes of it. I believe they’re very serious. They should be,” he said.

The US President also warned that Iran would face a “much higher level” of strikes if negotiations failed, while reiterating that preventing Tehran from developing a nuclear weapon remained his key red line.

The United States has said its military operations are aimed at preventing Iran from closing the strategically important Strait of Hormuz. Iran, meanwhile, has carried out retaliatory strikes on US bases, with four American service members reported killed.

Reports claim Trump discussed large-scale military operation

Trump’s remarks came after media reports suggested he met senior advisers to discuss the possibility of a large-scale military operation against Iran. Another report said he was considering a “massive attack”, although Trump did not confirm those reports during his interaction with journalists.

He also acknowledged that the prolonged conflict, which he had earlier expected to last only a few weeks, was approaching its fifth month and had become a political challenge ahead of the US midterm elections scheduled for November.

Trump issues warning over support for Iran

Trump also addressed reports claiming that Russia and China were providing intelligence or military support to Iran. He said both Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin had assured him they would not arm Tehran.

“I think they wouldn’t want to have me disappointed,” Trump said.

In a separate post on his Truth Social platform, Trump warned Moscow and Beijing against supplying weapons to Iran, saying such a move would not be in their interests.

He further stated that Xi had assured him during their meeting in Beijing in May that China would not provide weapons to Iran, while Putin had conveyed a similar position despite the ongoing war in Ukraine.

Continue Reading

India News

For second time, US strikes ship with Indian crew near Strait of Hormuz

Published

on

By

Strait of Hormuz

The United States Central Command (CENTCOM) has said that an oil tanker carrying Indian crew was drifting with its engine switched off near the Strait of Hormuz before it was struck by US forces.

A CENTCOM spokesperson said the vessel had stopped due to engine failure and was drifting after its crew repeatedly sought additional time to carry out repairs. US officials said the tanker was struck only after it failed to comply with directives issued by US forces enforcing a blockade on vessels allegedly transporting Iranian oil. The military said the strike was aimed at disabling the ship by targeting its engine room rather than sinking it.

The incident involved a tanker carrying Indian seafarers near the Gulf of Oman, close to the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s busiest maritime trade routes. The strike triggered a fire onboard, prompting rescue efforts by Omani authorities and maritime agencies. Indian authorities closely monitored the situation and coordinated with local officials regarding the welfare of the crew members.

The incident has drawn concern in India, with the government emphasising the safety of Indian nationals working aboard commercial vessels in the conflict-hit region. The Ministry of External Affairs has remained in touch with the authorities concerned as tensions between the United States and Iran continue to pose risks to international shipping.

In June, three Indian sailors were killed in a US strike on another oil tanker. The Strait of Hormuz handles a significant share of the word’s oil trade, and the latest incident has renewed concerns over the security of merchant vessels operating in the region. Maritime experts have warned that escalating hostilities could further disrupt commercial shipping and endanger civilian crews navigating one of the world’s most strategically important waterways.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump announces phased tariff of up to 200% on generic drug imports, India may face impact

US President Donald Trump has announced a phased tariff plan on imported generic medicines, raising duties to 200% after three years, a move that could affect India’s pharmaceutical exports.

Published

on

Donald Trump

The United States has announced a phased tariff plan for imported generic medicines that could have implications for pharmaceutical exporters, including India. US President Donald Trump said the policy is intended to encourage companies to shift generic drug manufacturing to the United States by imposing steep tariffs after a two-year transition period.

The announcement is particularly important for India, one of the world’s largest suppliers of affordable generic medicines and a major exporter to the US market.

Trump outlines phased tariff plan

In a post on his Truth Social platform, President Trump said the new policy will take effect from August 1, 2026. Under the plan, imported generic medicines will continue to attract zero tariffs for the first two years.

Beginning in the third year, the tariff will increase to 100%, before rising further to 200% thereafter.

Trump said the measure is designed to encourage pharmaceutical companies to establish manufacturing facilities in the United States instead of relying on imports.

He added that companies choosing not to invest in US-based production during the transition period would face the higher tariff rates. According to Trump, the existing policy governing patented, branded and innovative medicines will remain unchanged.

Why India could be affected

India is widely regarded as the “pharmacy of the world” because of its large-scale production and export of generic medicines.

Indian generic drugs account for nearly 40% of the US generic medicine market by volume. According to a Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) report, India exported pharmaceutical products worth USD 9.7 billion to the United States during the 2024-25 financial year, representing around 38% of the country’s total pharmaceutical exports of USD 25.8 billion.

However, the immediate impact of the newly announced tariff policy on Indian pharmaceutical companies remains uncertain.

Existing trade agreement and industry concerns

India and the United States struck a trade pact in February that states India would receive negotiated outcomes regarding generic pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical ingredients.

Despite that provision, previous tariff threats by Trump had already raised concerns within the pharmaceutical industry over the future of affordable medicine exports from India.

Indian pharmaceutical companies supply a wide range of generic medicines used to treat conditions including hypertension, diabetes, depression, cancer, infectious diseases and mental health disorders.

According to a Financial Post report cited in the source material, around 65% of birth control pill prescriptions in the United States during 2024 were manufactured by two India-based companies — Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Lupin Ltd.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com