English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

No third-party intervention: India rejects China’s claim on India-Pakistan truce

India has rejected China’s claim of mediating peace with Pakistan, stressing that the May ceasefire followed direct military talks and involved no third-party intervention.

Published

on

Jaishankar prasad

India has firmly rejected China’s claim that it played a mediating role in ending the military conflict between India and Pakistan earlier this year, reiterating that the ceasefire was the result of direct military-level communication between the two countries, with no third-party involvement.

The clarification comes after China echoed similar assertions made earlier by US President Donald Trump, projecting itself as a peace broker during the May conflict between New Delhi and Islamabad. Indian government sources, however, stressed that Pakistan had itself reached out for a ceasefire following Operation Sindoor.

According to sources, Islamabad requested a truce through established military channels, and there was no external mediation at any stage. They underlined that India’s long-standing position against third-party intervention in matters concerning India and Pakistan remains unchanged.

India’s position on the ceasefire

New Delhi has consistently maintained that the hostilities, which began on May 7, were resolved through direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two countries.

At a press briefing on May 13, the Ministry of External Affairs had clarified that the understanding on the ceasefire, including its timing and wording, was finalised during a phone call between the two DGMOs on May 10 at 15:35 hours. The government reiterated that no other country played any role in facilitating the agreement.

Indian officials have repeatedly emphasised that all issues related to India and Pakistan are to be addressed bilaterally, without any external involvement.

China reiterates mediation claims

China’s assertion came through remarks by its foreign minister, who claimed that Beijing had mediated peace in several conflict zones, including between India and Pakistan, during a period marked by heightened global instability.

While outlining China’s foreign policy approach at a symposium in Beijing, he said China had taken what he described as an objective stance to address both immediate conflicts and their root causes, citing its role in easing tensions in multiple regions.

India has not accepted these claims, making it clear that the India-Pakistan ceasefire followed established military protocols and bilateral engagement alone.

China’s role during the conflict under scrutiny

China’s involvement during the May conflict has also come under international scrutiny. A recent report by a bipartisan US commission stated that Beijing used the four-day confrontation between India and Pakistan as an opportunity to test and showcase its modern defence systems.

The report noted that several Chinese-made weapons were used in active combat for the first time during the conflict, providing real-world operational data. It further claimed that China later explored the possibility of offering advanced military platforms to Pakistan in the weeks following the hostilities.

Chinese diplomatic missions reportedly highlighted the performance of these systems after the conflict, which the report suggested was aimed at boosting defence exports. Beijing, however, downplayed allegations that it treated the conflict as a “live laboratory” for its weapons, avoiding direct responses to remarks made by senior Indian military officials on the issue.

Indian defence leadership has stated that China extended extensive support to Pakistan during Operation Sindoor, describing Beijing’s approach as indirect and strategic, aimed at exerting pressure on India without direct involvement.

Latest world news

India calls US religious freedom body biased over RSS sanctions demand

India has criticised USCIRF as biased and lacking credibility after the US body urged sanctions against RSS members ahead of Mohan Bhagwat’s New York visit.

Published

on

India has criticised the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) after the US body called for sanctions against members of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) ahead of RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat’s scheduled visit to the United States.

External Affairs Ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal described USCIRF as a “biased organisation” and said it lacked credibility.

“It is a biased organisation. I would say that we should keep away from such organisations as they have their own agenda and lack any credibility,” Jaiswal said.

He also accused the body of making “disparaging and inflammatory remarks” about India and said the USCIRF was unlikely to engage with the country’s “pluralistic framework” or acknowledge the harmonious coexistence of its diverse communities.

USCIRF seeks sanctions against RSS members

USCIRF chair Asif Mahmood opposed Mohan Bhagwat’s upcoming visit to the US and called on the American government to impose sanctions against the RSS. Bhagwat is scheduled to visit New York on August 29.

The US body also urged Washington not to extend diplomatic courtesies to RSS leaders. It described the RSS as an “umbrella organisation” and alleged that its sub-groups had “perpetrated attacks on religious minorities”.

USCIRF said the US government should instead focus on imposing sanctions on RSS members found responsible for freedom of religious belief violations.

USCIRF’s earlier criticism of India

In its annual report released in March, USCIRF criticised India over alleged violations of religious freedom and recommended targeted sanctions against individuals and entities, including the RSS and Research and Analysis Wing.

The commission also recommended designating India as a “country of particular concern”.

USCIRF is an independent, bipartisan US federal government agency that makes policy recommendations to the US President, Secretary of State and Congress and tracks their implementation.

Hindu advocacy group criticises USCIRF

US-based Hindu advocacy group HinduPACT also condemned USCIRF members’ public opposition to Bhagwat’s New York visit.

Ajay Shah, founder and chair of HinduPACT, accused the commission of having “disgraced its mandate” and alleged that its chair’s remarks reflected an anti-Hindu narrative.

Shah also criticised groups including CAIR, IAMC and HfHR, alleging that they had portrayed Hindu self-assertion as extremism.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

PM Modi meets Japanese Defence Minister, pushes India-Japan security ties

PM Modi met Japanese Defence Minister Shinjiro Koizumi in New Delhi and discussed strengthening India-Japan defence and security cooperation.

Published

on

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday, August 20, met Japanese Defence Minister Shinjiro Koizumi in New Delhi and discussed ways to further strengthen defence and security cooperation between India and Japan.

During the meeting, Modi outlined his vision for strengthening the India-Japan Special Strategic and Global Partnership and highlighted the importance of closer defence and security ties in promoting peace, stability and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific and beyond.

PM Modi recalls India-Japan summit discussions

During his meeting with Koizumi, Modi recalled his detailed discussions with Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi during her visit to India for the 16th India-Japan Annual Summit in July 2026.

The prime minister also appreciated the steady momentum in defence cooperation between the two countries.

According to a statement from the Prime Minister’s Office, Koizumi, who is on an official visit to India, called on Modi on Thursday.

Focus on defence cooperation and Make in India

Modi also highlighted opportunities for Japanese companies and startups to partner with Indian firms in the defence sector.

The discussions included possibilities for co-development and co-production under the Make in India initiative, according to the statement.

Later, Modi said in a post on X that he had an “excellent conversation” with Koizumi on deepening defence and security ties between India and Japan.

He said the Special Strategic and Global Partnership between the two countries is an important anchor for peace, stability and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific and beyond.

Japan reaffirms commitment to deeper ties

Koizumi briefed Modi on the progress of bilateral defence cooperation during the meeting.

The Japanese Defence Minister also reaffirmed Japan’s continued commitment to deepening ties with India, the Prime Minister’s Office said.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump warns Iran’s trading partners of economic action: India’s exports to take a hit?

Trump’s warning against countries supporting Iran could create payment, shipping and logistics challenges for Indian exporters.

Published

on

Donald Trump

US President Donald Trump has warned countries, financial institutions and businesses against providing Iran with what he called an “economic lifeline”, saying those that continue supporting Tehran could face “TREMENDOUS” economic consequences.

Trump’s warning comes as the United States steps up economic pressure on Iran. For India, the development could have implications for exporters, particularly those shipping agricultural products, food items and pharmaceuticals to the Iranian market.

India’s trade with Iran has already declined sharply over the years. However, Indian exporters continue to maintain a trade surplus with Tehran, making the potential impact of tighter US sanctions an issue to watch.

What did Trump say about Iran?

Trump has announced what he described as the “most crushing economic operation” against Iran and said the US would pursue economic warfare and isolation against Tehran.

His warning extends beyond Iran itself. Trump said countries, financial institutions and businesses that provide Tehran with financial or commercial support could face severe consequences.

The activities cited in his warning include oil smuggling, cash transfers, currency swap lines, exchange houses, ship registries and front companies.

“This will be an ECONOMIC D-DAY, and we need all of our Allies to stand with the United States of America to isolate, and defeat, the Iran threat,” Trump said.

He also warned that countries allowing their financial institutions, businesses, airports or government entities to support Iran could face “TREMENDOUS Economic Consequences”.

How much does India trade with Iran?

India remains an important trading partner of Iran, although bilateral trade has fallen significantly from previous levels.

According to data from the Indian Embassy in Tehran cited in the report, India’s exports to Iran stood at $1.25 billion in 2025-26, while imports from Iran were around $370 million. This gave India a trade surplus of approximately $880 million.

The scale of bilateral trade is considerably smaller than it was several years ago.

In 2018-19, India-Iran trade was worth $17.03 billion. India’s imports from Iran stood at $13.53 billion that year, while exports were $3.51 billion.

By 2024-25, total bilateral trade had fallen to $1.68 billion.

This sharp decline means India’s overall economic exposure to Iran is now relatively limited compared with the size of the Indian economy. However, businesses that continue to depend on the Iranian market could still face difficulties if US sanctions and enforcement are tightened.

What does India export to Iran?

India’s trade relationship with Iran extends beyond energy.

Major Indian exports to Iran include:

  • Basmati rice
  • Tea
  • Sugar
  • Fresh fruits
  • Drugs and pharmaceuticals
  • Spices
  • Cereals and other food products

Iran also exports products including pistachios, dates, apples and kiwis to India.

Any disruption to this trade could therefore affect businesses involved in agricultural products, food items and pharmaceuticals.

Why could Trump’s warning affect Indian exporters?

The immediate risk is not necessarily that India’s entire trade with Iran will stop.

Instead, Indian exporters could face greater difficulties with payments, shipping and logistics if the US expands sanctions or increases enforcement against businesses and financial institutions dealing with Tehran.

Shipping disruptions and higher freight costs could add to the pressure. The Strait of Hormuz remains a key pressure point, while vessel rerouting, elevated freight rates and tighter container availability can increase the cost and complexity of international trade.

For exporters with direct exposure to Iran, such disruptions could make shipments more expensive and payments more complicated.

India’s exports are finding other markets

India’s broader export performance provides some cushion against a potential slowdown in trade with Iran.

India’s merchandise exports reached a record $44.24 billion in July, representing a 19.6 per cent increase from a year earlier, according to the figures cited in the report.

Engineering goods exports rose 17.7 per cent to $12.24 billion, while electronics exports jumped 57.4 per cent to around $5.9 billion.

Exports to the Middle East also increased 8.6 per cent to $5.7 billion.

India has also been expanding its trade across several other markets. In July, exports to China increased 64.57 per cent year-on-year to $2.2 billion, while shipments to Singapore rose 83.7 per cent to $1.6 billion.

Exports to the US increased 12.85 per cent to $9.02 billion.

The diversification of India’s export markets could help businesses reduce their dependence on individual markets if geopolitical tensions disrupt trade with Iran.

Will Trump’s Iran warning hurt India?

Trump’s warning could affect Indian exporters doing business with Iran through higher shipping costs, payment complications and weaker demand if economic pressure on Tehran intensifies.

The impact is likely to be more significant for businesses with direct exposure to the Iranian market than for the Indian economy as a whole.

India-Iran trade has already contracted substantially from its earlier levels. With Indian exporters increasingly accessing markets across regions including ASEAN, Africa, South Asia and North-East Asia, India may be better placed to absorb the impact of any further disruption in Iran trade.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com