English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

No third-party intervention: India rejects China’s claim on India-Pakistan truce

India has rejected China’s claim of mediating peace with Pakistan, stressing that the May ceasefire followed direct military talks and involved no third-party intervention.

Published

on

Jaishankar prasad

India has firmly rejected China’s claim that it played a mediating role in ending the military conflict between India and Pakistan earlier this year, reiterating that the ceasefire was the result of direct military-level communication between the two countries, with no third-party involvement.

The clarification comes after China echoed similar assertions made earlier by US President Donald Trump, projecting itself as a peace broker during the May conflict between New Delhi and Islamabad. Indian government sources, however, stressed that Pakistan had itself reached out for a ceasefire following Operation Sindoor.

According to sources, Islamabad requested a truce through established military channels, and there was no external mediation at any stage. They underlined that India’s long-standing position against third-party intervention in matters concerning India and Pakistan remains unchanged.

India’s position on the ceasefire

New Delhi has consistently maintained that the hostilities, which began on May 7, were resolved through direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two countries.

At a press briefing on May 13, the Ministry of External Affairs had clarified that the understanding on the ceasefire, including its timing and wording, was finalised during a phone call between the two DGMOs on May 10 at 15:35 hours. The government reiterated that no other country played any role in facilitating the agreement.

Indian officials have repeatedly emphasised that all issues related to India and Pakistan are to be addressed bilaterally, without any external involvement.

China reiterates mediation claims

China’s assertion came through remarks by its foreign minister, who claimed that Beijing had mediated peace in several conflict zones, including between India and Pakistan, during a period marked by heightened global instability.

While outlining China’s foreign policy approach at a symposium in Beijing, he said China had taken what he described as an objective stance to address both immediate conflicts and their root causes, citing its role in easing tensions in multiple regions.

India has not accepted these claims, making it clear that the India-Pakistan ceasefire followed established military protocols and bilateral engagement alone.

China’s role during the conflict under scrutiny

China’s involvement during the May conflict has also come under international scrutiny. A recent report by a bipartisan US commission stated that Beijing used the four-day confrontation between India and Pakistan as an opportunity to test and showcase its modern defence systems.

The report noted that several Chinese-made weapons were used in active combat for the first time during the conflict, providing real-world operational data. It further claimed that China later explored the possibility of offering advanced military platforms to Pakistan in the weeks following the hostilities.

Chinese diplomatic missions reportedly highlighted the performance of these systems after the conflict, which the report suggested was aimed at boosting defence exports. Beijing, however, downplayed allegations that it treated the conflict as a “live laboratory” for its weapons, avoiding direct responses to remarks made by senior Indian military officials on the issue.

Indian defence leadership has stated that China extended extensive support to Pakistan during Operation Sindoor, describing Beijing’s approach as indirect and strategic, aimed at exerting pressure on India without direct involvement.

Latest world news

Trump rejects Iran peace proposal, warns Tehran over uranium dispute

Donald Trump has rejected Iran’s latest response to a US peace proposal, escalating tensions over uranium enrichment, sanctions relief and control of the Strait of Hormuz.

Published

on

Donald Trump statement

US President Donald Trump has rejected Iran’s latest response to a US-backed peace proposal, calling Tehran’s position “totally unacceptable” as negotiations aimed at ending the ongoing conflict remain stalled.

According to reports, Iran responded to the American proposal by demanding war reparations, the removal of sanctions, recognition of its sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz, and the release of frozen Iranian assets. Tehran also warned it would retaliate against any fresh US military strikes and oppose the deployment of additional foreign warships in the region.

The dispute has intensified over Iran’s nuclear programme, particularly uranium enrichment. The US proposal reportedly sought strict limits on Iran’s nuclear activities, including a long-term halt to uranium enrichment and tighter international oversight. However, Iran’s counter-response did not accept key American demands related to dismantling or restricting its nuclear infrastructure.

Iran has maintained that its nuclear programme is for civilian purposes, while the US and its allies continue to push for stronger safeguards amid concerns over regional security.

The latest exchange comes amid continuing tensions in the Strait of Hormuz, a strategically important shipping route for global oil supplies. Concerns over disruptions in the region have already pushed oil prices higher in international markets.

Reports also suggest that the US proposal aimed to expand the current ceasefire framework and create conditions for broader negotiations involving regional conflicts and maritime security. However, both sides remain far apart on major issues, including sanctions relief and nuclear restrictions.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump approves nearly $9 billion weapons sales to Israel, UAE and other allies amid Iran tensions

The US has fast-tracked nearly $9 billion in weapons sales to Israel, UAE and other allies as tensions linked to the Iran conflict continue despite a fragile ceasefire.

Published

on

Donald Trump statement

The United States has approved nearly $9 billion worth of weapons sales to key Middle Eastern allies, including Israel and the United Arab Emirates, amid ongoing tensions linked to the Iran conflict.

The decision, cleared by the administration of Donald Trump, includes expedited military transfers to Israel, the UAE, Qatar, and Kuwait. The approvals were granted under an emergency provision, allowing authorities to bypass the usual congressional review process.

Emergency clearance amid ongoing conflict

Officials said the move was necessary due to the evolving security situation in the region, particularly as the conflict involving Iran continues despite a fragile ceasefire. The war, which began earlier in 2026, has heightened instability across West Asia.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio invoked emergency powers to fast-track the deals, citing urgent defence requirements for allied nations.

What the arms package includes

The approved package includes a mix of advanced defence systems and precision weapons:

  • Patriot missile defence replenishments worth over $4 billion for Qatar
  • Precision-guided weapon systems for multiple countries
  • Integrated battle command systems for Kuwait
  • Additional advanced weapons support for Israel and the UAE

The total value of these deals is estimated at over $8.6 billion, often rounded to nearly $9 billion.

Timing linked to iran war

The approval comes nearly nine weeks into the conflict involving the US, Israel, and Iran, with tensions still high despite a ceasefire that has been in place for several weeks.

Analysts note that the move signals continued US military backing for its regional allies, particularly in strengthening air defence and precision strike capabilities during uncertain conditions.

Criticism and concerns

The decision to bypass congressional oversight has drawn criticism from some quarters, particularly over transparency and the broader implications of increasing arms supplies in a conflict-prone region.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump and Putin hold over 90-minute call, discuss Iran war and Ukraine conflict

Trump and Putin held a 90-minute call focusing on Iran tensions and the Ukraine conflict, with warnings over escalation and talks of ceasefire.

Published

on

Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump

US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin held a phone conversation lasting more than 90 minutes, focusing on escalating tensions in the Middle East and the ongoing war in Ukraine.

According to official statements, the discussion was described as “frank and businesslike,” with both leaders addressing key global security concerns. A major part of the conversation centred on the situation involving Iran and developments in the Persian Gulf.

Putin supported Trump’s decision to extend the ceasefire related to Iran, suggesting that continued restraint could create space for negotiations and help stabilise the region. However, he also issued a strong warning, stating that renewed military action by the United States or Israel could lead to “extremely damaging consequences” not only for Iran but for the wider international community.

Ukraine conflict also discussed

The leaders also discussed the ongoing war in Ukraine, which has continued for several years since Russia’s invasion in 2022. During the call, there were indications of potential efforts toward a temporary ceasefire, although no final agreement has been confirmed.

Reports suggest that the idea of a short-term pause in hostilities was explored, possibly linked to upcoming symbolic dates, but significant differences between the parties remain unresolved.

Focus on diplomacy amid global tensions

The call highlights ongoing diplomatic engagement between Washington and Moscow at a time of heightened geopolitical tensions involving both the Middle East and Eastern Europe.

While both sides acknowledged the importance of dialogue, the situation on the ground in both conflict zones remains complex, with no immediate resolution in sight.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com