English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

No third-party intervention: India rejects China’s claim on India-Pakistan truce

India has rejected China’s claim of mediating peace with Pakistan, stressing that the May ceasefire followed direct military talks and involved no third-party intervention.

Published

on

Jaishankar prasad

India has firmly rejected China’s claim that it played a mediating role in ending the military conflict between India and Pakistan earlier this year, reiterating that the ceasefire was the result of direct military-level communication between the two countries, with no third-party involvement.

The clarification comes after China echoed similar assertions made earlier by US President Donald Trump, projecting itself as a peace broker during the May conflict between New Delhi and Islamabad. Indian government sources, however, stressed that Pakistan had itself reached out for a ceasefire following Operation Sindoor.

According to sources, Islamabad requested a truce through established military channels, and there was no external mediation at any stage. They underlined that India’s long-standing position against third-party intervention in matters concerning India and Pakistan remains unchanged.

India’s position on the ceasefire

New Delhi has consistently maintained that the hostilities, which began on May 7, were resolved through direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two countries.

At a press briefing on May 13, the Ministry of External Affairs had clarified that the understanding on the ceasefire, including its timing and wording, was finalised during a phone call between the two DGMOs on May 10 at 15:35 hours. The government reiterated that no other country played any role in facilitating the agreement.

Indian officials have repeatedly emphasised that all issues related to India and Pakistan are to be addressed bilaterally, without any external involvement.

China reiterates mediation claims

China’s assertion came through remarks by its foreign minister, who claimed that Beijing had mediated peace in several conflict zones, including between India and Pakistan, during a period marked by heightened global instability.

While outlining China’s foreign policy approach at a symposium in Beijing, he said China had taken what he described as an objective stance to address both immediate conflicts and their root causes, citing its role in easing tensions in multiple regions.

India has not accepted these claims, making it clear that the India-Pakistan ceasefire followed established military protocols and bilateral engagement alone.

China’s role during the conflict under scrutiny

China’s involvement during the May conflict has also come under international scrutiny. A recent report by a bipartisan US commission stated that Beijing used the four-day confrontation between India and Pakistan as an opportunity to test and showcase its modern defence systems.

The report noted that several Chinese-made weapons were used in active combat for the first time during the conflict, providing real-world operational data. It further claimed that China later explored the possibility of offering advanced military platforms to Pakistan in the weeks following the hostilities.

Chinese diplomatic missions reportedly highlighted the performance of these systems after the conflict, which the report suggested was aimed at boosting defence exports. Beijing, however, downplayed allegations that it treated the conflict as a “live laboratory” for its weapons, avoiding direct responses to remarks made by senior Indian military officials on the issue.

Indian defence leadership has stated that China extended extensive support to Pakistan during Operation Sindoor, describing Beijing’s approach as indirect and strategic, aimed at exerting pressure on India without direct involvement.

Latest world news

India-bound tanker among 2 vessels seized by Iran’s Revolutionary Guards amid Hormuz tensions

Iran’s seizure of an India-bound tanker near the Strait of Hormuz signals rising maritime tensions and risks to global oil supply routes.

Published

on

Strait of Hormuz

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has seized two vessels near the strategically crucial Strait of Hormuz, with one of them reportedly bound for India, intensifying concerns over maritime security in the region.

The development comes amid escalating tensions linked to the ongoing confrontation involving Iran and the United States, which has already disrupted shipping routes and heightened risks for commercial vessels passing through the area.

According to reports, the vessels were intercepted by Iranian forces close to the Strait of Hormuz — a critical chokepoint through which a significant portion of the world’s oil supply transits. The move underscores growing instability in one of the busiest and most sensitive maritime corridors globally.

Separate reports indicate that multiple ships have faced attacks or interceptions in recent days, with at least two vessels taken into custody by Iranian authorities after being targeted near Iranian waters.

The incident follows a series of confrontations at sea, including gunfire and forced halts of commercial ships, as tensions remain high despite attempts at ceasefire arrangements.

The Strait of Hormuz has become a focal point of the broader conflict, with both military actions and retaliatory measures affecting shipping traffic. Any disruption in this region carries global implications, particularly for countries like India that depend heavily on energy imports passing through the route.

India has already been taking steps to safeguard its maritime interests, including enhanced monitoring and security measures for vessels navigating the region.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Fresh tensions as Iran targets vessel despite ceasefire announcement

Iran fired at a vessel in the Strait of Hormuz shortly after a ceasefire announcement, raising concerns over regional stability.

Published

on

Attack on vessel highlights fragile situation in Strait of Hormuz despite renewed ceasefire push

Tensions in the Middle East escalated again after Iran opened fire on a commercial vessel in the Strait of Hormuz, just hours after US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire extension.

According to maritime security officials, an Iranian Revolutionary Guard gunboat fired at a container ship early on April 22. The vessel was damaged in the incident, but no injuries or environmental damage were reported.

The attack comes amid already heightened tensions in the region, where the strategic Strait of Hormuz — a key global oil transit route — has seen severe disruptions in recent days.

Ceasefire efforts face immediate test

The firing incident occurred shortly after Trump signalled an extension of the ceasefire, reportedly aimed at creating space for renewed negotiations with Iran. However, the latest development has raised concerns about the durability of the truce.

Reports indicate that the Iranian action followed recent US military moves, including the seizure of vessels linked to Tehran and continued naval pressure in the region.

Shipping route remains volatile

The Strait of Hormuz remains a flashpoint, with shipping traffic significantly affected. In recent days, only a handful of vessels have been able to pass through the route, compared to normal volumes, leaving many ships stranded.

The waterway is critical for global energy supplies, handling a significant share of the world’s oil shipments. Any disruption has immediate implications for international markets.

No official response yet

Iran has not officially commented on the latest firing incident. Meanwhile, international observers and maritime agencies continue to monitor the situation closely, warning of risks to crew safety and global trade.

The latest escalation underscores the fragile nature of ongoing diplomatic efforts, with both sides yet to reach a stable agreement.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump extends Iran ceasefire after Pakistan request, raises hopes for talks

The US extends its Iran ceasefire after Pakistan’s request, opening a window for diplomacy while tensions persist

Published

on

Donald Trump statement

The United States has extended its ceasefire with Iran, with former US President Donald Trump stating that the decision came after a request from Pakistan’s leadership. The move comes just hours before the truce was due to expire, offering a temporary pause in escalating tensions.

Trump said the extension is intended to provide Iran additional time to present a “unified proposal” for a broader peace agreement, signalling a shift towards diplomacy even as pressure on Tehran continues.

Pakistan steps in as mediator

Pakistan has played a key role in facilitating the ceasefire extension. Its leadership, including top civil and military figures, urged the US to delay further action and allow diplomatic efforts to continue.

The development positions Pakistan as an emerging mediator in the crisis, with efforts underway to encourage dialogue between Washington and Tehran. The country has also indicated willingness to support or host discussions aimed at de-escalation.

Pressure remains despite pause

Despite the extension of the ceasefire, the situation remains tense. The US has not rolled back its strategic posture in the region.

Military readiness continues, and restrictions such as the naval blockade linked to Iran remain in place. This indicates that while direct confrontation has been paused, broader pressure tactics are still active.

What Pakistan could gain

Pakistan’s involvement in the ceasefire process could bring several advantages.

First, it enhances the country’s global diplomatic standing by placing it at the centre of a major international issue. Acting as a mediator between two adversaries can improve its credibility on the world stage.

Second, stability in the region is directly beneficial for Pakistan’s economic interests, particularly given its reliance on energy supplies linked to the broader Middle East.

Finally, successful mediation could strengthen Pakistan’s strategic influence, giving it a more prominent role in future geopolitical developments.

Uncertain road ahead

While the ceasefire extension has reduced immediate risks, uncertainty remains over how the situation will evolve. Much will depend on whether Iran presents a proposal acceptable to the US and whether negotiations can move forward.

For now, the extension reflects a temporary shift away from confrontation, but the underlying tensions remain unresolved.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com