English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Maldives: President Yameen may face impeachment

Published

on

Maldives: President Yameen may face impeachment

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Supreme Court may ask for president’s impeachment

The political crisis in Maldives, just 600 km south-west of Indian shores, is deepening with President Abdulla Yameen not complying with the Supreme Court’s order for getting the jailed opposition leaders including former president Mohamed Nasheed released.

Different media outlets in Male, the country’s capital, indicate that Supreme Court has hit back President Yameen’s refusal to free his jailed opponents amid security forces sealing off the parliament and arresting two opposition lawmakers.

Judges at the Supreme Court have said that there should be “no legal barrier” to releasing the nine opposition leaders, whose terrorism and corruption convictions were overturned last week.

Supreme Court statement came after Attorney General Mohamed Anil raised concerns about freeing convicted people for their involvement in terrorism, corruption, embezzlement and fraud.

The recent rulings of Supreme Court has plunged Maldives into a political crisis, considered to be a blow to President Yameen who is criticised for alleged corruption, misrule and human rights abuse.

Earlier, President Yameen wrote a letter to Supreme Court asking to revoke its decision to terminate the arrest warrant for Hassan Saeed, the judicial administrator of Department of Judicial Administration (DJA).

In one of his tweets on Saturday former President Mohamed Nasheed said that disobeying Supreme Court is tantamount to a coup.

[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]JTNDYmxvY2txdW90ZSUyMGNsYXNzJTNEJTIydHdpdHRlci10d2VldCUyMiUyMGRhdGEtbGFuZyUzRCUyMmVuJTIyJTNFJTNDcCUyMGxhbmclM0QlMjJlbiUyMiUyMGRpciUzRCUyMmx0ciUyMiUzRVN0YXRlbWVudHMlMjBtYWRlJTIwdG9kYXklMjBieSUyMEFHJTIwQW5pbCUyQyUyMENERiUyMFNoaXlhbSUyMGFuZCUyMEFjdGluZyUyMENQJTIwTmF3YXolMkMlMjB0byUyMGRpc29iZXklMjBTQyUyMG9yZGVycyUyMGlzJTIwdGFudGFtb3VudCUyMHRvJTIwYSUyMGNvdXAuJTIwVGhleSUyQyUyMGFuZCUyMFByZXNpZGVudCUyMFlhbWVlbiUyMG11c3QlMjByZXNpZ24lMjBpbW1lZGlhdGVseS4lMjBTZWN1cml0eSUyMHNlcnZpY2VzJTIwbXVzdCUyMHVwaG9sZCUyMHRoZSUyMGNvbnN0aXR1dGlvbiUyMGFuZCUyMHNlcnZlJTIwdGhlJTIwTWFsZGl2aWFuJTIwcGVvcGxlLiUzQyUyRnAlM0UlMjZtZGFzaCUzQiUyME1vaGFtZWQlMjBOYXNoZWVkJTIwJTI4JTQwTW9oYW1lZE5hc2hlZWQlMjklMjAlM0NhJTIwaHJlZiUzRCUyMmh0dHBzJTNBJTJGJTJGdHdpdHRlci5jb20lMkZNb2hhbWVkTmFzaGVlZCUyRnN0YXR1cyUyRjk2MDA1NTE3NTYzNjM3MzUwNCUzRnJlZl9zcmMlM0R0d3NyYyUyNTVFdGZ3JTIyJTNFRmVicnVhcnklMjA0JTJDJTIwMjAxOCUzQyUyRmElM0UlM0MlMkZibG9ja3F1b3RlJTNFJTBBJTNDc2NyaXB0JTIwYXN5bmMlMjBzcmMlM0QlMjJodHRwcyUzQSUyRiUyRnBsYXRmb3JtLnR3aXR0ZXIuY29tJTJGd2lkZ2V0cy5qcyUyMiUyMGNoYXJzZXQlM0QlMjJ1dGYtOCUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRnNjcmlwdCUzRSUwQQ==[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]Meanwhile Mihaaru, english daily based in Male reports that country’s ruling Progressive Party of Maldives (PPM) leader and Member of Parliament Ahmed Nihan, responding to late Sunday rumours of the SC preparing to issue an order to impeach President Abdulla Yameen.

While addressing PPM’s parliamentary group, he said that an attempt to impeach a democratically elected President would be a “declaration of war on the Maldives”. He said that such an act, whether domestic or not, would never be accepted by Maldivians, he said.

Supreme Court had earlier sided with President Abdulla Yameen. However the current SC verdict has exerted unprecedented pressure on the president to free his opponents before country goes ahead for presidential election scheduled later this year.

On Sunday, the attorney general, flanked by the Chiefs of army and police, while appearing on state TV  said the government has received news of an imminent order by the Supreme Court to impeach Yameen.  “I have informed all law enforcement agencies they must not obey such an illegal order,” Mohamed Anil said.

The army chief Ahmed Shiyam  said the security forces would follow the attorney-general’s advice and “will not wait and watch as the Maldives descends into crisis”.

PPM leader Ahmed Nihan said that while police and military would naturally join forces to defend the nation, the people themselves would take the initiative to march ahead as the first line of defence against impeachment of their elected president.

Maldives: President Yameen may face impeachment

PPM’s deputy leader Abdul Raheen Abdulla also censured SC judges saying that top court cannot sieze and hoard a power that does not belong to them. He was quoted saying, “Impeaching the president is not a power accorded to the Supreme Court. To force a power you do not own is to violate the Constitution.”

On late Thursday SC issued its verdict ordering the immediate release of nine political leaders, reinstated 12 suspended lawmakers and lifted its previous ban on floor-crossing.

The opposition now have a majority in the 85-member house as the SC ruling has reinstated the suspended 12 members of parliament who were stripped of their seats last year.

Meanwhile, two of the 12 reinstated lawmakers were arrested at the Male airport on Sunday, shortly after they returned to the Maldives after spending several months in exile.

Ibrahim Mohamed Solih, an opposition parliamentarian, condemned their arrest saying, “We call on the police to release the MPs immediately, and to stop following unlawful orders, to stop obstructing the lawful mandate of parliamentarians.”

“In a desperate attempt to cling onto power, President Yameen has illegally overrun the state. His attorney-general has illegally assumed the powers of the apex court, while the military has overrun the legislature,” he added.

On Sunday, former president Mohamed Nasheed, while speaking to a private television channel from neighbouring Sri Lanka,  has called for protests and urged rank-and-file members of the security forces to arrest the attorney-general as well as the chiefs of the army and police.

Parliament’s secretariat head Ahmed Mohamed has resigned after the speaker, a Yameen ally, canceled the opening of the parliament, scheduled for Tuesday, over unspecified “security concerns”.   The heads of the Maldives’ main high-security prison and the elections commission have also resigned in recent days.

Several countries and world bodied including, UN, EU, US and India have urged incumbent President Yameen to comply with the Supreme Court’s ruling.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Markets surge as Nifty jumps 750 points after India-US trade deal

Indian equity markets rallied sharply with Nifty and Sensex posting strong gains after the India-US trade agreement announcement.

Published

on

Sensex

The Indian equity markets opened sharply higher on Tuesday morning, buoyed by optimism following the announcement of a trade agreement between India and the United States.

In early trade, the Nifty jumped around 750 points, while the Sensex surged nearly 2,400 points, reflecting strong investor confidence hours after the deal was made public.

The rally came after US President Donald Trump announced that Washington would slash tariffs on Indian goods to 18 per cent from 50 per cent, as part of a broader trade agreement with New Delhi. In return, India agreed to halt purchases of Russian oil and lower trade barriers, according to the announcement.

President Trump shared the development in a post on his social media platform, calling it a major trade breakthrough. The announcement was followed by a message from Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who thanked the US President on behalf of the people of India for the decision.

Rupee opens stronger against dollar

The positive sentiment was also reflected in the currency market. The Indian rupee opened stronger at 90.40 against the US dollar, gaining 1.10 rupees in early trade, supported by expectations of increased foreign investor inflows following the deal.

Asian markets rebound

Asian markets also traded higher, adding to the positive global cues. Japan’s Nikkei rose about 2.5 per cent, recovering from previous losses, while South Korea’s KOSPI climbed nearly 4 per cent. Market sentiment was further supported by signs of improved US factory activity overnight.

Futures indicated a recovery in Hong Kong markets, while S&P 500 futures were up around 0.3 per cent, as investors tracked upcoming corporate earnings.

With global cues turning favourable and optimism surrounding the India-US trade agreement, Indian markets are expected to remain buoyant, with investors closely watching further developments during the trading session.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump announces trade deal with India, claims New Delhi will stop buying Russian oil

Donald Trump announces a trade deal with India, reducing US tariffs to 18 per cent and claiming New Delhi will halt Russian oil purchases.

Published

on

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday announced that the United States and India have agreed to a trade deal that will reduce American tariffs on Indian goods from 25 per cent to 18 per cent. The announcement was made through a post on Trump’s social media platform, Truth Social.

According to Trump, the decision was taken “out of friendship and respect” for Prime Minister Narendra Modi and at the Indian leader’s request. He stated that the revised tariff would take effect immediately, with remaining formalities to be completed in the coming days.

Prime Minister Modi, in a post shortly after Trump’s announcement, thanked the US President for what he described as a significant step, expressing appreciation on behalf of India’s population.

Tariff reduction to be finalised soon

While neither government initially shared detailed terms of the agreement, the US ambassador to India later indicated that further clarity would follow. In an interaction with media, he confirmed that the overall tariff on Indian goods entering the US market would stand at 18 per cent once the deal is formally concluded.

He added that some procedural aspects are still pending, but the tariff rate itself has been agreed upon and is not expected to change.

Trump also claimed that India would move to reduce its own tariffs and non-tariff barriers on US goods to zero, though no official statement from the Indian side has detailed such measures so far.

Claim on Russian oil purchases

In his post, Trump further asserted that India has agreed to stop buying Russian oil and instead increase its energy purchases from the United States and potentially Venezuela. He linked this claim to broader geopolitical developments, stating that such a move would contribute to ending the war in Ukraine.

There has been no official confirmation from New Delhi regarding any commitment to halt Russian oil imports.

Timing linked to wider trade developments

The announcement comes soon after India concluded a major free trade agreement with the European Union following prolonged negotiations. That agreement provides India with expanded access to the EU market, particularly in pharmaceuticals and medical devices, and is expected to support manufacturing, employment and MSMEs.

The tariff reduction by the US was also announced a day after India presented its annual budget, which included measures aimed at addressing challenges arising from higher US tariffs imposed earlier.

Background of stalled negotiations

Trade talks between India and the US had slowed in recent months after Washington imposed a steep tariff on Indian goods over continued energy purchases from Russia. Negotiations resumed following renewed engagement between the two sides, including high-level discussions between the two leaders.

Officials had earlier indicated that progress was being made toward a trade agreement, with cooperation expanding across areas such as technology, energy, defence and trade.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

India rejects Hague court proceedings on Indus Waters Treaty

India has reiterated it will not participate in Hague arbitration proceedings under the Indus Waters Treaty, stating the agreement remains in abeyance following the Pahalgam attack.

Published

on

Indus Water Treaty

India has reiterated its refusal to recognise or participate in proceedings initiated by a Court of Arbitration in The Hague under the Indus Waters Treaty framework, asserting that the treaty itself remains in abeyance following the Pahalgam terror attack last year.

Despite the arbitration court moving ahead with fresh hearings and procedural orders, New Delhi has made it clear that it does not consider the panel legally constituted and will not respond to its communications.

India dismisses court orders as illegitimate

The latest development centres on an order issued by the Court of Arbitration directing India to submit operational pondage logbooks of the Baglihar and Kishanganga hydroelectric projects. The documents were sought as part of what the court described as the “second phase on the merits” of the dispute.

Hearings have been scheduled for February 2 and 3 at the Peace Palace in The Hague. The court has noted that India has neither filed counter submissions nor indicated its participation in the process.

However, government sources said the arbitration panel was “so-called and illegally constituted” and accused it of conducting parallel proceedings alongside the neutral expert mechanism prescribed under the treaty. According to the sources, India does not acknowledge the court’s authority and therefore does not engage with its directions.

They further stated that since the Indus Waters Treaty has been placed in abeyance, India is under no obligation to respond to such requests, describing the move as an attempt by Pakistan to draw New Delhi back into the process.

Treaty placed in abeyance after Pahalgam attack

India’s decision to suspend the treaty dates back to April 23, 2025, a day after a terror attack in Pahalgam claimed the lives of 26 civilians. The government formally placed the six-decade-old water-sharing agreement in abeyance, linking cooperation under the treaty to Pakistan’s continued support for cross-border terrorism.

The move marked a significant shift in policy, signalling that bilateral arrangements could not operate independently of security considerations.

Pakistan escalates international outreach

Since the decision, Pakistan has stepped up diplomatic and legal efforts, approaching international forums, sending delegations abroad and initiating multiple legal actions to challenge India’s stance.

The Indus river system remains critical for Pakistan’s economy, with a large share of its agriculture dependent on its waters. Limited storage capacity and stressed reservoirs have further heightened Islamabad’s concerns, turning what was once a technical dispute into a strategic issue.

Neutral expert versus arbitration court

Under the treaty’s dispute resolution mechanism, technical disagreements are to be examined by a neutral expert, while legal disputes may be referred to a Court of Arbitration. India has consistently maintained that the current issues fall within the technical domain and has accused Pakistan of forum shopping by activating arbitration proceedings.

The arbitration court has, however, proceeded with the case, stating that India’s position on suspending the treaty does not affect its competence. It has also warned that adverse inferences could be drawn if India fails to comply with its directions.

New Delhi rejects this interpretation and continues to recognise only the neutral expert process, viewing attempts to link the two mechanisms as illegitimate.

Strategic standoff continues

Officials believe the ongoing proceedings in The Hague, conducted without India’s participation, are unlikely to result in binding outcomes. Instead, they see the situation as part of a broader strategic contest, with India choosing disengagement and Pakistan seeking internationalisation of the dispute.

India has consistently maintained that treaties cannot function in isolation from ground realities and that cooperation will remain suspended until what it describes as persistent hostility is addressed.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com