English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Pakistan SC disqualifies Nawaz Sharif as PM over Panama Papers case

Published

on

Pak SC debarred Nawaz Sharif as PM on Panama Papers case

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]In a unanimous verdict, 5-judge Bench says case of Sharif family’s dubious financial dealings will be referred to an accountability court within six weeks; Sharif’s finance minister Ishaq Dar also dismissed

In a landmark decision that will no doubt have far reaching consequences in Pakistan’s political and social churning over the next few days, a five-judge Bench of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, on Friday, disqualified Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif from holding public office in a case related to last year’s Panama Papers exposé which had revealed how the country’s first family amassed wealth through dubious means and invested it through shady deals.

The unanimous verdict, passed by a Bench headed by Justice Asif Saeed Khan and comprising justices Ejaz Afzal Khan, Gulzar Ahmed, Sheikh Azmat Saeed and Ijazul Ahsan, recommended that all material collected by the joint investigation team (JIT) tasked with probing the Sharif family’s financial dealings would be sent to an accountability court within six weeks.

The JIT had been constituted in April after the Supreme Court Bench failed to reach a unanimous verdict on Sharif’s disqualification and it submitted its finding to the top court earlier this month, stating that the charges of financial impropriety were found to be true.

Further, the court also said that proceedings on the references made to the National Accountability Board (NAB) of Pakistan on the allegations of dubious financial dealings of Sharif and his family members, including his sons Hussain and Hassan Nawaz and daughter Maryam, should be wrapped up within six months. Besides the Sharif family, the cases will also be opened against Finance Minister Ishaq Dar and Captain Muhammad Safdar , a member of the National Assembly of Pakistan. Both Dar and Captain Safdar have also been dismissed from their posts.

In a packed courtroom – filled largely with supporters of Sharif and an army of lawyers and journalists – Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan read out the verdict shortly after 12 noon, saying: “He (Nawaz Sharif) is disqualified as a member of the Parliament so he has ceased to be holding the office of Prime Minister.”

Pakistani media reports immediately began speculating that Sharif could also face arrest over the next few days considering the grave charges that have been made out against him – which, besides allegations of financial misconduct, also include misleading the nation and being dishonest to the Parliament and the court.

The court also asked the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) to de-notify the prime minister from his National Assembly seat – effectively meaning that Sharif election now stands void and he can’t contest again till the court allows him to do so – to fulfill the technicalities of implementing the order. The Supreme Court said the ECP should “de-seat the PM for not disclosing his role in the Dubai-based Capital FZE company in his nomination papers” and in doing so he was “not honest and truthful”.

Soon after the verdict was pronounced, the Pakistan establishment signalled that it would make a last ditch effort to help Sharif stay on as Prime Minister despite the top court’s reference to the ECP for de-notifying his election. Although the Supreme Court specifically urged Pakistan President Mamnoon Hussain “to ensure a smooth transition for the democratic process”, Attorney General of Pakistan, Ashtar Ausaf Ali, told mediapersons in Lahore that “the Prime Minister still holds the office and will continue to do so until the President asks him otherwise”.

The Pak Attorney General quoted Article 190 of the Pakistan Constitution which says that it is the prerogative of the President to decide on whether a sitting prime minister should be asked to step down or not.

However, there is a legal precedent in Pakistan of the Supreme Court dismissing a Prime Minister from holding office. In 2012, then Premier Yousaf Raza Gilani was disqualified over contempt of court charges for refusing to re-open a corruption case against then President Asif Ali Zardari.[/vc_column_text][vc_row_inner css=”.vc_custom_1501236988306{margin-bottom: 20px !important;border-bottom-width: 20px !important;padding-top: 20px !important;background-color: #a2b1bf !important;}”][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]Khawaja Asif to be made interim PM till Shahbaz can take over?

Khawaja Asif and Nawaz ShahbazThis is for the third time that Sharif would be unable to complete his term as Prime Minister of Pakistan. Although Sharif’s dismissal from office was largely seen as a foregone conclusion, there is no clarity yet on who will take over as Prime Minister now. Local media reports from Pakistan suggest that Defence Minister Khawaja Asif could be elevated as the interim PM. In the run up to Friday’s court hearing, banners urging Sharif’s younger brother and current chief minister of Pakistan’s Punjab province, Shahbaz Sharif, to take over as the PM had sprung up all across Lahore and sources say that though Asif could for now be made the interim PM, Shahbaz would eventually be appointed to the office and serve out the remained of the term till the 2018 general elections in Pakistan.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1501237125162{margin-bottom: 20px !important;border-bottom-width: 20px !important;padding-top: 20px !important;background-color: #a2b1bf !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]Panama papers case against Nawaz Sharif and family

Panama Papers CaseHussain and Hasan Nawaz Sharif, and Mariam Safdar, the sons and daughter of the Pakistan Prime Minister allegedly set up at least four offshore companies in British Virgin Islands (BVI). These companies are said to own at least six upmarket properties overlooking London’s Hyde Park. The Sharif family reportedly mortgaged four of these properties to the Deutsche Bank (Suisse) SA for a loan of GBP 7 million and the Bank of Scotland part financed the purchase of two other apartments. Nawaz Sharif has denied ownership of all these properties and dismissed the allegations against him and his family.

Nescol Limited and Nielson Holdings Limited were incorporated in BVI in 1993 and 1994, respectively, and were held by one bearer share each. In February 2006, Mariam Safdar signed a resolution of Nescol Limited as the “sole (bearer) shareholder”. Mossack Fonseca was appointed as the registered agent through Minerva Trust which described Mariam Safdar as the beneficial owner of both companies, the Indian Express-International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) joint investigation into the Panama papers had revealed.

The Panama Papers investigation saw multiple news organizations from across the world, including The Indian Express from India, join their efforts in 2016 on the issue of unearthing unaccounted wealth of some of the world’s most rich and famous politicians and businessmen, after the ICIJ shared files from the database of the world’s fourth biggest offshore law firm, Mossack Fonseca. The records had been obtained from an anonymous source by German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1501237200570{padding-top: 20px !important;background-color: #a2b1bf !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]The Joint Investigation Team

On April 20, 2017, a five-judge bench of the Supreme Court of Pakistan had pronounced its verdict in the Panama Papers case against Sharif. However, the verdict was split as three of the five judges ruled in favour of forming a Joint Investigation Team (JIT) to find out whether the allegations against the Pakistan Prime Minister and his family were true or not. Only two judges – Justices Asif Saeed Khosa and Gulzar Ahmed – ruled for Sharif’s disqualification from office. The top court had then set up a six-member JIT to investigate the charges against Sharif and his family and had asked the first family of Pakistan to appear before the JIT as and when summoned.

The JIT members, during a seven-week period, interrogated eight members of the Sharif family – PM Nawaz Sharif, his younger brother Shahbaz Sharif, sons Hassan and Hussain Nawaz, daughter Maryam Nawaz, son-in-law Captain Safdar, cousin Tariq Shafi and Finance Minister Ishaq Dar, among others.

The six-member JIT included Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) Additional Director General Wajid Zia, Military Intelligence’s Brigadier Kamran Khurshid, National Accountability Bureau (NAB) Director Irfan Naeem Mangi, State Bank of Pakistan’s Amer Aziz, Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) Executive Director Bilal Rasool and Inter-Services Intelligence’s Brigadier Muhammad Nauman Saeed.

In its report submitted to the apex court on July 10, the JIT said that the Sharif family led a lifestyle that was beyond its known and declared sources of income and charged them with concealment of facts and being beneficial owners of multiple offshore companies. The JIT also recommended initiation of reference against the PM and members of his family in the NAB while highlighting their failure in providing a money trail for their London apartments. Sharif, however, maintained that the JIT report was a “bundle of baseless allegations.”[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Latest world news

India closely monitoring situation in Iran, urges nationals to leave

India has advised its citizens in Iran to leave the country as authorities closely monitor the deteriorating security situation, with nearly 9,000 Indians currently residing there.

Published

on

The Indian government on Friday said it is closely monitoring the evolving security situation in Iran and has advised Indian nationals currently in the country to leave using available means. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) stressed that ensuring the safety and well-being of Indian citizens remains a priority.

Speaking during the weekly media briefing in New Delhi, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said approximately 9,000 Indians are presently residing in Iran, with students forming the majority of the community. He said the government has issued multiple advisories in response to recent developments.

“In light of the situation, we have advised Indian citizens in India not to travel to Iran at this time, and those currently residing there have been asked to leave the country by whatever means are available,” Jaiswal said.

The spokesperson added that the government is maintaining close vigilance over developments and is prepared to take necessary steps for the welfare of Indian nationals.

Embassy advisories and travel warnings

The Indian Embassy in Tehran has issued an advisory asking Indian citizens — including students, businesspersons, pilgrims and tourists — to depart Iran through available transport options, including commercial flights, citing the evolving security environment.

Separately, the MEA reiterated its advisory urging Indians to avoid travel to Iran until further notice. It also recalled an earlier warning issued on January 5, advising Indian nationals in Iran to remain cautious and refrain from participating in protests or demonstrations.

Indian citizens in Iran have been asked to keep essential travel and identification documents, including passports, readily accessible. Those living in the country on resident visas have also been advised to register with the Indian Embassy.

Protests and regional tensions

The advisories come against the backdrop of nationwide protests in Iran, which began at Tehran’s Grand Bazaar in late December following a sharp fall in the Iranian rial. The demonstrations later spread across the country amid mounting economic challenges, including inflation, unemployment, power outages and water shortages.

Regional tensions have also risen amid international warnings of possible military action if the situation escalates further. These developments have prompted several countries, including India, to review travel advisories and safety measures for their citizens in Iran.

India has maintained long-standing ties with Iran, though officials have indicated that recent international trade-related announcements linked to Tehran are expected to have a limited impact, given the relatively small share of bilateral trade in India’s overall commerce.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump calls it a wonderful gesture as Machado presents him Nobel Peace Prize medal

Donald Trump described it as a “wonderful gesture” after Venezuela’s opposition leader Maria Corina Machado presented him with her Nobel Peace Prize medal during a White House meeting.

Published

on

donald-trump

US President Donald Trump has described it as a “wonderful gesture” after Venezuela’s opposition leader Maria Corina Machado presented him with her Nobel Peace Prize medal during a meeting at the White House.

Trump praised Machado publicly after the interaction, saying she had been through “so much” and that the act reflected “mutual respect.” He said the medal was given to him for the work he has done, according to his post on his social media platform.

The gesture, however, has drawn attention as the Nobel Institute has clarified that a Nobel Peace Prize cannot be transferred to another individual.

Nobel Institute rules out transfer of prize

The Nobel Institute has stated that Machado is not permitted to give her Nobel Peace Prize to Trump. Despite this, a White House official confirmed that Trump intends to keep the medal, even if the act remains symbolic.

Trump has long expressed interest in the Nobel Peace Prize, making the episode particularly notable despite the formal limitations placed on such honours.

Political context behind the meeting

Machado had been widely regarded as Venezuela’s democratic leader-in-waiting before Trump’s recent policy decisions regarding the country. Earlier this month, Trump declined to fully back her challenge to Venezuela’s ruling regime and instead signalled openness to engaging with leaders linked to the existing power structure.

Trump has publicly questioned Machado’s ability to lead, saying she lacks sufficient support and respect within Venezuela. Her political party is believed to have won the 2024 elections, results that were rejected by President Nicolas Maduro.

Trump has also indicated a willingness to work with acting President Delcy Rodriguez, who previously served as Maduro’s deputy.

What Machado said after the meeting

Speaking to reporters after leaving the White House and heading to Capitol Hill, Machado said she presented the medal to the US president as recognition of his “unique commitment” to Venezuela’s freedom.

She added that Trump did not provide detailed assurances during their closed-door discussion, including on the issue of elections in Venezuela. No further specifics of the meeting were disclosed.

Afterwards, Machado greeted supporters gathered near the White House gates, hugging several of them. Addressing the crowd, she said they could count on President Trump, prompting brief chants of appreciation from those present.

Machado’s recent public appearance

Before her visit to Washington, Machado had largely stayed out of public view since travelling to Norway last month, where her daughter accepted the Nobel Peace Prize on her behalf. She had spent nearly a year in hiding in Venezuela before appearing at the ceremony.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

US freezes immigrant visa processing for 75 countries, India not in list

The United States suspends immigrant visa processing for 75 countries, excluding temporary visas, as part of stricter immigration measures.

Published

on

The United States has indefinitely suspended immigrant visa processing for 75 countries, targeting individuals seeking permanent residency based on nationality. The move, set to take effect on January 21, excludes tourist and temporary work visas, but is expected to have a significant impact on family-based immigration.

Reasons behind the visa freeze

The US State Department said the suspension aims to prevent the entry of foreign nationals likely to require government welfare and public benefits. “The Trump administration is bringing an end to the abuse of America’s immigration system by those who would extract wealth from the American people,” said State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott.

While the administration cites the risk of immigrants draining government resources, studies by the Cato Institute and other research groups suggest immigrants generally use fewer benefits than US-born citizens.

Who will not be affected

Temporary visas for tourists, business travelers, and sports fans remain unaffected. Exceptions are also allowed for individuals with dual nationality, a valid passport from a country not on the list, or travel serving an “America First” national interest. Approved visas that have not yet been printed must be refused according to the State Department.

Countries affected

The visa freeze covers nations across Africa, Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, and Eastern Europe. Some of the most affected countries include Pakistan, Bangladesh, Somalia, Russia, Iran, Afghanistan, Brazil, Nigeria, and Thailand.

Other countries on the full list include Albania, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Barbados, Belarus, Belize, Bhutan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Myanmar, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Colombia, Côte d’Ivoire, Cuba, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Dominica, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Fiji, The Gambia, Georgia, Ghana, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Haiti, Iraq, Jamaica, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, North Macedonia, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Nepal, Nicaragua, Republic of the Congo, Rwanda, St Kitts and Nevis, St Lucia, St Vincent and the Grenadines, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, and Yemen.

Trump administration immigration record

The Trump administration has already imposed stricter vetting procedures over the past year, revoking over 100,000 visas and deporting more than 605,000 people, with 2.5 million others leaving voluntarily. Critics highlight that the policy disproportionately affects immigrants from non-European countries.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com