Amidst Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman’s ongoing two-and-half weeklong visit to US, Saudi Arabian forces have intercepted seven missiles fired by Yemen’s Houthi Ansarullah in retaliation to the continued bombing on civilian targets. One of the missiles was targeted on capital Riyadh.
According to official Alarabia.net, Turki al-Malki, spokesman for Arab Coalition said “This aggressive and hostile action by the Iran-backed Houthi group proves that the Iranian regime continues to support the armed group with military capabilities. The firing of multiple ballistic missiles towards cities is a serious development.”
It has also claimed of receiving a video covering the moment anti-missile defense missiles were fired from Saudi Patriot batteries to intercept the Houthi missile over the capital.
Since November last year, Yemen’s Iran-aligned Houthi militias have fired multiple missiles into Saudi Arabia, all of which Saudi forces have intercepted.
Meanwhile Tehran based Press TV reports that Yemen’s Ansarullah fighters and allied army units have carried out more retaliatory missile attacks against Saudi Arabia, targeting several positions in the kingdom.
It further said, Yemen’s military targeted King Khalid International Airport in Riyadh and Abha, Najran and Jizan regional airports with ballistic missiles. It quoted Saudi state television saying that its air force intercepted “some of the missiles over the northeastern part of the capital Riyadh on Sunday night”.
Official Saudi Press Agency (SPA) has reported that Yemeni forces fired seven missiles into the kingdom killing an Egyptian resident and wounding two other Egyptian nationals. Turki al-Malki, the official spokesman for the coalition, has confirmed that the death and injuries occurred in a residential house and were caused by falling debris.
Meanwhile, Abdul Malik Badreddin al-Houthi, the leader of the Houthi Ansarullah, has said that Saudi Arabia would not have dared to launch a campaign against Yemen if it had not received direct assistance from the US.
He was addressing live on state television on Sunday night on the third anniversary of the beginning of the Saudi led campaign. He said that the parties involved in the Saudi-led aggression against Yemen are backed by Washington, and are offered extensive military support as well as media coverage.
Al-Houthi alleged that Saudi Arabia and UAE were “puppet regimes” that are implementing US and Israeli plots in Yemen. He said, “The only parties benefiting from civil wars in the [Middle East] region are Americans and Israelis, who are responsible for most of the regional conflicts. The US is playing the principal intelligence and logistical role concerning the military aggression against Yemen.”
He further said, “Saudi Arabia is paying all the costs of the war on Yemen, and US officials are accordingly reaping substantial benefits. Aggressors want to take control of Yemen because of its highly strategic location.”
Describing his commitment with other oppressed people in the region, the Houthi leader extended his support to Palestinians and Bahraini counterparts. He said that Yemenis would never forget the sufferings of Palestinian nation and Bahraini people.
His opinions on the regional conflicts are similar to that of Iranian government. The basic tenets of the Iran’s Islamic revolution are clearly marked with their support to the oppressed Palestinians by Israeli forces and anti-Al-Khalifa regime movement, dominated by Shias in Bahrain. Iran does not recognise Israel as a country, instead Tehran calls the country a “Zionist entity”.
The Houthi Ansarullah leader also praised the Yemenis resistance against Saudi-led aggression, and said, “They wanted to bring us to our knees. However, they did not expect us to mount such spirited resistance because we do not want to give them any concessions.”
Earlier last week, Abdul Malik Badreddin al-Houthi had stressed that Saudi Arabia will finally fail in its all-out military aggression against Yemen as it failed in Syria and Iraq. He was speaking in an exclusive interview with Lebanon’s Arabic language Al-Akhbar daily newspaper.
Meanwhile, Yemen’s Ministry of Human Rights announced on Sunday, that the Saudi-led war has left 600,000 civilians killed and injured since March 2015.
United Nations say that a record 22.2 million Yemenis are in need of food aid, including 8.4 million threatened by severe hunger. It has warned against the “catastrophic” living conditions saying that there is a growing risk of famine and cholera in the country.
Yemen is facing sea, land and air blockade which started in 2015 with the positioning of Saudi Arabian warships. US had joined the blockade in October 2016, which was further constricted following the November 2017 launch of a Houthi missile targeting Riyadh airport.
Saudi authorities had claimed of intercepting the missile while Houthis claimed of hitting the target. Riyadh had alleged Iran for supplying the powerful missile, which was denied by Tehran.
The Indian equity markets opened sharply higher on Tuesday morning, buoyed by optimism following the announcement of a trade agreement between India and the United States.
In early trade, the Nifty jumped around 750 points, while the Sensex surged nearly 2,400 points, reflecting strong investor confidence hours after the deal was made public.
The rally came after US President Donald Trump announced that Washington would slash tariffs on Indian goods to 18 per cent from 50 per cent, as part of a broader trade agreement with New Delhi. In return, India agreed to halt purchases of Russian oil and lower trade barriers, according to the announcement.
President Trump shared the development in a post on his social media platform, calling it a major trade breakthrough. The announcement was followed by a message from Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who thanked the US President on behalf of the people of India for the decision.
Rupee opens stronger against dollar
The positive sentiment was also reflected in the currency market. The Indian rupee opened stronger at 90.40 against the US dollar, gaining 1.10 rupees in early trade, supported by expectations of increased foreign investor inflows following the deal.
Asian markets rebound
Asian markets also traded higher, adding to the positive global cues. Japan’s Nikkei rose about 2.5 per cent, recovering from previous losses, while South Korea’s KOSPI climbed nearly 4 per cent. Market sentiment was further supported by signs of improved US factory activity overnight.
Futures indicated a recovery in Hong Kong markets, while S&P 500 futures were up around 0.3 per cent, as investors tracked upcoming corporate earnings.
With global cues turning favourable and optimism surrounding the India-US trade agreement, Indian markets are expected to remain buoyant, with investors closely watching further developments during the trading session.
US President Donald Trump on Tuesday announced that the United States and India have agreed to a trade deal that will reduce American tariffs on Indian goods from 25 per cent to 18 per cent. The announcement was made through a post on Trump’s social media platform, Truth Social.
According to Trump, the decision was taken “out of friendship and respect” for Prime Minister Narendra Modi and at the Indian leader’s request. He stated that the revised tariff would take effect immediately, with remaining formalities to be completed in the coming days.
Prime Minister Modi, in a post shortly after Trump’s announcement, thanked the US President for what he described as a significant step, expressing appreciation on behalf of India’s population.
Tariff reduction to be finalised soon
While neither government initially shared detailed terms of the agreement, the US ambassador to India later indicated that further clarity would follow. In an interaction with media, he confirmed that the overall tariff on Indian goods entering the US market would stand at 18 per cent once the deal is formally concluded.
He added that some procedural aspects are still pending, but the tariff rate itself has been agreed upon and is not expected to change.
Trump also claimed that India would move to reduce its own tariffs and non-tariff barriers on US goods to zero, though no official statement from the Indian side has detailed such measures so far.
Claim on Russian oil purchases
In his post, Trump further asserted that India has agreed to stop buying Russian oil and instead increase its energy purchases from the United States and potentially Venezuela. He linked this claim to broader geopolitical developments, stating that such a move would contribute to ending the war in Ukraine.
There has been no official confirmation from New Delhi regarding any commitment to halt Russian oil imports.
Timing linked to wider trade developments
The announcement comes soon after India concluded a major free trade agreement with the European Union following prolonged negotiations. That agreement provides India with expanded access to the EU market, particularly in pharmaceuticals and medical devices, and is expected to support manufacturing, employment and MSMEs.
The tariff reduction by the US was also announced a day after India presented its annual budget, which included measures aimed at addressing challenges arising from higher US tariffs imposed earlier.
Background of stalled negotiations
Trade talks between India and the US had slowed in recent months after Washington imposed a steep tariff on Indian goods over continued energy purchases from Russia. Negotiations resumed following renewed engagement between the two sides, including high-level discussions between the two leaders.
Officials had earlier indicated that progress was being made toward a trade agreement, with cooperation expanding across areas such as technology, energy, defence and trade.
India rejects Hague court proceedings on Indus Waters Treaty
India has reiterated it will not participate in Hague arbitration proceedings under the Indus Waters Treaty, stating the agreement remains in abeyance following the Pahalgam attack.
India has reiterated its refusal to recognise or participate in proceedings initiated by a Court of Arbitration in The Hague under the Indus Waters Treaty framework, asserting that the treaty itself remains in abeyance following the Pahalgam terror attack last year.
Despite the arbitration court moving ahead with fresh hearings and procedural orders, New Delhi has made it clear that it does not consider the panel legally constituted and will not respond to its communications.
India dismisses court orders as illegitimate
The latest development centres on an order issued by the Court of Arbitration directing India to submit operational pondage logbooks of the Baglihar and Kishanganga hydroelectric projects. The documents were sought as part of what the court described as the “second phase on the merits” of the dispute.
Hearings have been scheduled for February 2 and 3 at the Peace Palace in The Hague. The court has noted that India has neither filed counter submissions nor indicated its participation in the process.
However, government sources said the arbitration panel was “so-called and illegally constituted” and accused it of conducting parallel proceedings alongside the neutral expert mechanism prescribed under the treaty. According to the sources, India does not acknowledge the court’s authority and therefore does not engage with its directions.
They further stated that since the Indus Waters Treaty has been placed in abeyance, India is under no obligation to respond to such requests, describing the move as an attempt by Pakistan to draw New Delhi back into the process.
Treaty placed in abeyance after Pahalgam attack
India’s decision to suspend the treaty dates back to April 23, 2025, a day after a terror attack in Pahalgam claimed the lives of 26 civilians. The government formally placed the six-decade-old water-sharing agreement in abeyance, linking cooperation under the treaty to Pakistan’s continued support for cross-border terrorism.
The move marked a significant shift in policy, signalling that bilateral arrangements could not operate independently of security considerations.
Pakistan escalates international outreach
Since the decision, Pakistan has stepped up diplomatic and legal efforts, approaching international forums, sending delegations abroad and initiating multiple legal actions to challenge India’s stance.
The Indus river system remains critical for Pakistan’s economy, with a large share of its agriculture dependent on its waters. Limited storage capacity and stressed reservoirs have further heightened Islamabad’s concerns, turning what was once a technical dispute into a strategic issue.
Neutral expert versus arbitration court
Under the treaty’s dispute resolution mechanism, technical disagreements are to be examined by a neutral expert, while legal disputes may be referred to a Court of Arbitration. India has consistently maintained that the current issues fall within the technical domain and has accused Pakistan of forum shopping by activating arbitration proceedings.
The arbitration court has, however, proceeded with the case, stating that India’s position on suspending the treaty does not affect its competence. It has also warned that adverse inferences could be drawn if India fails to comply with its directions.
New Delhi rejects this interpretation and continues to recognise only the neutral expert process, viewing attempts to link the two mechanisms as illegitimate.
Strategic standoff continues
Officials believe the ongoing proceedings in The Hague, conducted without India’s participation, are unlikely to result in binding outcomes. Instead, they see the situation as part of a broader strategic contest, with India choosing disengagement and Pakistan seeking internationalisation of the dispute.
India has consistently maintained that treaties cannot function in isolation from ground realities and that cooperation will remain suspended until what it describes as persistent hostility is addressed.
APN News is today the most watched and the most credible and respected news channel in India. APN has been at the forefront of every single news revolution. The channel is being recognized for its in-depth, analytical reportage and hard hitting discussions on burning issues; without any bias or vested interests.