English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Sheikh Hasina calls Yunus a murderous fascist in address to Delhi gathering

In her first public address from exile, Sheikh Hasina accused Muhammad Yunus of leading an illegal and violent administration and called for unity to restore democracy in Bangladesh.

Published

on

Sheikh Hasina

Former Bangladesh prime minister Sheikh Hasina on Friday launched a scathing attack on Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, accusing him of heading an “illegal and violent” administration that has pushed Bangladesh into what she described as a period of terror, lawlessness and democratic collapse.

Hasina delivered the address through an audio message to a packed audience at the Foreign Correspondents’ Club in Delhi, marking her first public address in India since leaving Bangladesh in 2024. The event, titled Save Democracy in Bangladesh, was attended by several former ministers from her Awami League government and members of the Bangladeshi diaspora.

Although she did not appear in person, Hasina’s speech was uncompromising in tone, repeatedly branding Yunus a “murderous fascist” and accusing him of betraying the nation for personal power.

‘Democracy is now in exile,’ says Hasina

Opening her address, Hasina said Bangladesh was standing “at the edge of an abyss” and claimed that democracy had effectively been forced into exile since her removal from office on August 5, 2024. She alleged that her ouster was the result of a “meticulously engineered conspiracy” aimed at dismantling the country’s constitutional order.

According to Hasina, the situation in Bangladesh has deteriorated sharply since then, with the collapse of law and order, unchecked mob violence and widespread fear among citizens.

“Life and property have no security,” she said, alleging that violence, looting and extortion have spread from urban centres to rural areas.

She further accused the current dispensation of suppressing press freedom, targeting political opponents and allowing violence against women and minorities to continue without restraint.

Sharp personal attack on Muhammad Yunus

The former prime minister reserved her strongest criticism for Yunus, accusing him of bleeding the country dry and compromising national sovereignty by allegedly serving foreign interests.

Hasina warned that Bangladesh was being pushed towards instability and conflict, claiming that the current leadership was engaged in a “treacherous plot” that threatened the nation’s territorial and constitutional integrity.

Invoking the legacy of the Liberation War and her father, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, she framed the political crisis as an existential struggle for Bangladesh’s identity and independence.

Call for unity and five-point political demand

Positioning the Awami League as the principal defender of Bangladesh’s democratic and pluralist traditions, Hasina urged supporters of the pro-Liberation camp to unite and resist what she termed a puppet regime.

She laid out five key demands, beginning with the removal of the Yunus-led administration to restore democracy and pave the way for free and fair elections. She claimed credible elections would be impossible under the current setup.

Her other demands included the restoration of law and order, guarantees for the safety of minorities and women, an end to politically motivated legal actions against journalists and opposition figures, and the revival of judicial independence.

Hasina also called for a fresh and impartial United Nations investigation into developments over the past year, saying only an objective inquiry could help the country reconcile and move forward.

Political messaging from Indian soil

The address carried symbolic significance, being Hasina’s first public speech in India since she arrived there following her ouster. Her remarks signalled her intent to continue influencing Bangladesh’s political narrative from abroad.

She concluded the address with a call for mass mobilisation, urging citizens not to lose hope and to join what she described as a fight to reclaim democracy and national dignity.

Context of recent interview

Earlier, in a detailed interview given from a secure location in Delhi, Hasina had accused the interim administration in Dhaka of steering Bangladesh towards authoritarianism and extremist influence. She also spoke about the events surrounding her removal from power and alleged targeted attacks on minorities following her exit.

Latest world news

Trump rejects Iran peace proposal, warns Tehran over uranium dispute

Donald Trump has rejected Iran’s latest response to a US peace proposal, escalating tensions over uranium enrichment, sanctions relief and control of the Strait of Hormuz.

Published

on

Donald Trump statement

US President Donald Trump has rejected Iran’s latest response to a US-backed peace proposal, calling Tehran’s position “totally unacceptable” as negotiations aimed at ending the ongoing conflict remain stalled.

According to reports, Iran responded to the American proposal by demanding war reparations, the removal of sanctions, recognition of its sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz, and the release of frozen Iranian assets. Tehran also warned it would retaliate against any fresh US military strikes and oppose the deployment of additional foreign warships in the region.

The dispute has intensified over Iran’s nuclear programme, particularly uranium enrichment. The US proposal reportedly sought strict limits on Iran’s nuclear activities, including a long-term halt to uranium enrichment and tighter international oversight. However, Iran’s counter-response did not accept key American demands related to dismantling or restricting its nuclear infrastructure.

Iran has maintained that its nuclear programme is for civilian purposes, while the US and its allies continue to push for stronger safeguards amid concerns over regional security.

The latest exchange comes amid continuing tensions in the Strait of Hormuz, a strategically important shipping route for global oil supplies. Concerns over disruptions in the region have already pushed oil prices higher in international markets.

Reports also suggest that the US proposal aimed to expand the current ceasefire framework and create conditions for broader negotiations involving regional conflicts and maritime security. However, both sides remain far apart on major issues, including sanctions relief and nuclear restrictions.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump approves nearly $9 billion weapons sales to Israel, UAE and other allies amid Iran tensions

The US has fast-tracked nearly $9 billion in weapons sales to Israel, UAE and other allies as tensions linked to the Iran conflict continue despite a fragile ceasefire.

Published

on

Donald Trump statement

The United States has approved nearly $9 billion worth of weapons sales to key Middle Eastern allies, including Israel and the United Arab Emirates, amid ongoing tensions linked to the Iran conflict.

The decision, cleared by the administration of Donald Trump, includes expedited military transfers to Israel, the UAE, Qatar, and Kuwait. The approvals were granted under an emergency provision, allowing authorities to bypass the usual congressional review process.

Emergency clearance amid ongoing conflict

Officials said the move was necessary due to the evolving security situation in the region, particularly as the conflict involving Iran continues despite a fragile ceasefire. The war, which began earlier in 2026, has heightened instability across West Asia.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio invoked emergency powers to fast-track the deals, citing urgent defence requirements for allied nations.

What the arms package includes

The approved package includes a mix of advanced defence systems and precision weapons:

  • Patriot missile defence replenishments worth over $4 billion for Qatar
  • Precision-guided weapon systems for multiple countries
  • Integrated battle command systems for Kuwait
  • Additional advanced weapons support for Israel and the UAE

The total value of these deals is estimated at over $8.6 billion, often rounded to nearly $9 billion.

Timing linked to iran war

The approval comes nearly nine weeks into the conflict involving the US, Israel, and Iran, with tensions still high despite a ceasefire that has been in place for several weeks.

Analysts note that the move signals continued US military backing for its regional allies, particularly in strengthening air defence and precision strike capabilities during uncertain conditions.

Criticism and concerns

The decision to bypass congressional oversight has drawn criticism from some quarters, particularly over transparency and the broader implications of increasing arms supplies in a conflict-prone region.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump and Putin hold over 90-minute call, discuss Iran war and Ukraine conflict

Trump and Putin held a 90-minute call focusing on Iran tensions and the Ukraine conflict, with warnings over escalation and talks of ceasefire.

Published

on

Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump

US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin held a phone conversation lasting more than 90 minutes, focusing on escalating tensions in the Middle East and the ongoing war in Ukraine.

According to official statements, the discussion was described as “frank and businesslike,” with both leaders addressing key global security concerns. A major part of the conversation centred on the situation involving Iran and developments in the Persian Gulf.

Putin supported Trump’s decision to extend the ceasefire related to Iran, suggesting that continued restraint could create space for negotiations and help stabilise the region. However, he also issued a strong warning, stating that renewed military action by the United States or Israel could lead to “extremely damaging consequences” not only for Iran but for the wider international community.

Ukraine conflict also discussed

The leaders also discussed the ongoing war in Ukraine, which has continued for several years since Russia’s invasion in 2022. During the call, there were indications of potential efforts toward a temporary ceasefire, although no final agreement has been confirmed.

Reports suggest that the idea of a short-term pause in hostilities was explored, possibly linked to upcoming symbolic dates, but significant differences between the parties remain unresolved.

Focus on diplomacy amid global tensions

The call highlights ongoing diplomatic engagement between Washington and Moscow at a time of heightened geopolitical tensions involving both the Middle East and Eastern Europe.

While both sides acknowledged the importance of dialogue, the situation on the ground in both conflict zones remains complex, with no immediate resolution in sight.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com