English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Lok Sabha passes Waqf Amendment Bill

Singh called the bill “illegitimate,” alleging it was designed to incite violence ahead of assembly elections in Bihar and West Bengal, purely to create controversy.

Published

on

After more than 12 hours of debate, the Lok Sabha on Wednesday passed the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, by 288 votes in favour and 232 against.

The bill, introduced earlier in the day by Union Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju, aims to enhance the management of Waqf properties, leverage technology for transparency, and resolve administrative complexities, as recommended by a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC).

Rijiju hailed the JPC’s consultation process as the most extensive in India’s parliamentary history, noting that it received over 97.27 lakh petitions and memorandums through physical and online channels. “Each submission was carefully reviewed before finalizing the report,” he said, underscoring the thoroughness of the exercise.

However, the Bill’s passage was far from smooth. Union Home Minister Amit Shah robustly defended the legislation, accusing the Opposition of spreading “fear-mongering for vote-bank politics” by claiming it interferes with Muslims’ religious affairs and property rights.

“No land can be declared Waqf property by mere declaration. Lands belonging to the Archaeological Survey of India, governments, tribal communities, and private citizens will be safeguarded by this law. All Muslim communities—Shia, Pasmanda, Ahmadiya, Bohras—can register trusts without going through the Waqf route,” Shah clarified during the debate.

He dismissed Opposition allegations that laws like the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), the abrogation of Article 370, the Triple Talaq ban, and the Ram Mandir construction had stripped Muslims of citizenship, challenging critics to provide evidence. “Look at Jammu and Kashmir—Omar Abdullah is ruling as Chief Minister,” he pointed out, countering the narrative.

Shah also invoked RJD chief Lalu Yadav’s 2013 remarks, where Yadav had called for a strong law to curb thefts in the name of Waqf properties. “You couldn’t fulfill his wish, but Narendra Modi has. This bill will apply retrospectively,” Shah declared, asserting that the Modi government was pursuing a “politics of progress.” He confidently predicted, “Modi has been elected for three terms, and for the next three terms, it will be a BJP government.”

Speaking in the Lower House, Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi, the Deputy Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, accused the government of using the Bill to “weaken the Constitution, defame minorities, divide Indian society, and disenfranchise marginalized groups.”

He challenged Rijiju’s claim that the UPA government had transferred 123 properties to the Delhi Waqf Board before the 2014 elections, labeling it “a complete lie” and demanding proof. “Rijiju misled the House with political accusations,” Gogoi charged, also criticizing Speaker Om Birla for not intervening.

Rijiju retorted by asking Gogoi to specify which part of his statement was inaccurate. “Don’t make blanket accusations; point to the exact issue,” he urged. Gogoi doubled down, reiterating his objection to Rijiju’s 2013 references.

Congress MP KC Venugopal took a broader swipe, accusing the Centre of an “agenda to destroy minorities.” Without naming Prime Minister Narendra Modi, he warned, “Today you target Muslims, tomorrow Christians, and the day after, Sikhs. You are dividing the country for political gain in the name of religion, even as you project yourself as a world leader abroad. The world is watching.”

Samajwadi Party leader Akhilesh Yadav accused the BJP of introducing the Bill to distract from its past failures, questioning their commitment to women’s empowerment by asking how many female candidates they would field in the upcoming Uttar Pradesh elections. He cautioned that the bill threatened India’s secular fabric.

Speaking to reporters, Aam Aadmi Party leader Sanjay Singh and MLA Amanatullah Khan also voiced strong objections. Khan questioned Shah’s claims about the prime locations of 130 Waqf properties, hinting at a BJP plot to seize them, citing past encroachments on Muslim graveyards and buildings. Singh called the bill “illegitimate,” alleging it was designed to incite violence ahead of assembly elections in Bihar and West Bengal, purely to create controversy.

India News

Amit Shah counters delimitation concerns, says southern states to gain Lok Sabha seats

Amit Shah assures Parliament that southern states will gain Lok Sabha seats after delimitation, countering opposition criticism during the women’s reservation debate.

Published

on

Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday addressed concerns over the proposed delimitation exercise, asserting in the Lok Sabha that southern states will not lose representation but instead see an increase in their number of seats.

His remarks came during a heated debate linked to the implementation of women’s reservation, where opposition parties have raised fears that population-based delimitation could reduce the political weight of southern states.

Shah rejected these claims, calling them misleading, and said the proposed framework ensures fairness while expanding the overall strength of the Lok Sabha.

Seat count to rise with expansion of Lok Sabha

The government has indicated that the total number of Lok Sabha seats could increase significantly as part of the delimitation process. In this expanded House, the combined representation of southern states is expected to rise from 129 seats at present to around 195 seats.

Shah emphasised that no state will lose seats in absolute terms, and the exercise is designed to reflect population changes while maintaining balance across regions.

State-wise projections shared in Parliament

During his address, Shah also provided indicative figures for individual southern states, suggesting notable increases in representation. According to the projections:

  • Tamil Nadu could see its seats rise substantially
  • Kerala, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to gain additional seats
  • Karnataka’s representation may increase as well

These figures were presented to counter the argument that delimitation would disproportionately favour northern states.

Political debate intensifies over linkage with women’s quota

The delimitation exercise has been closely linked to the rollout of women’s reservation, which proposes one-third seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies.

Opposition leaders have questioned this linkage, arguing that tying reservation to delimitation could delay its implementation and raise federal concerns. Some leaders have also warned that the move could impact national unity if apprehensions among states are not addressed.

The government, however, maintains that the reforms are necessary to ensure equitable representation and to align the electoral system with demographic realities.

Centre dismisses ‘false narrative’ on southern states

Shah reiterated that concerns about southern states losing influence are unfounded. He said the delimitation process will increase representation across regions and described the criticism as a “false narrative” aimed at creating confusion.

The issue is expected to remain a key flashpoint as Parliament continues discussions on the women’s reservation framework and related legislative changes.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com