English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Sonia Gandhi questions Centre’s silence on Khamenei killing, cites Iran’s past support on Kashmir

Published

on

sonia

Senior Congress leader Sonia Gandhi has criticised the Centre for not issuing a direct statement on the reported killing of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, saying that silence in such a situation amounts to an “abdication” rather than neutrality.

In a column published in media, Gandhi argued that India’s relationship with Tehran is rooted in both civilisational and strategic interests and said the government should have responded more clearly to the development.

Centre calls for restraint, avoids direct comment

While the government has not issued a specific statement on Khamenei’s death, it has urged restraint and de-escalation in the Middle East. Sources have indicated that India’s calibrated response is in line with that of major global powers and reflects a diplomatic approach guided by national interest.

Gandhi, however, questioned this position. Referring to Iran’s confirmation on March 1 that Khamenei was assassinated in targeted strikes allegedly carried out by the United States and Israel, she described the episode as a “grave rupture” in international relations, particularly as it occurred during ongoing negotiations.

She also criticised Prime Minister Narendra Modi for initially condemning Iran’s retaliatory strike on the UAE without addressing what she called the preceding US-Israeli actions. Later remarks expressing “deep concern” and advocating dialogue and diplomacy, she suggested, did not sufficiently acknowledge the broader context.

Questions over foreign policy direction

According to Gandhi, failing to clearly defend sovereignty and international law in the face of such an incident could weaken India’s credibility on the global stage. She argued that if the targeted killing of a foreign leader during a diplomatic process passes without principled objection, it risks normalising the erosion of international norms.

She further noted that the timing of the episode — shortly after the Prime Minister’s visit to Israel, where he reiterated support for the government led by Benjamin Netanyahu — adds to the unease, especially amid ongoing global criticism over civilian casualties in Gaza.

Kashmir reference and strategic ties

Gandhi also invoked a past diplomatic episode related to Kashmir. She recalled that in 1994, when sections within the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation sought to advance a resolution against India at the UN Commission on Human Rights over Kashmir, Iran played a significant role in blocking the move. According to her, that intervention helped prevent the internationalisation of the issue at a sensitive time for India.

She further pointed to Iran’s role in facilitating India’s diplomatic presence in Zahedan, near the Pakistan border, describing it as strategically relevant in the context of the development of Gwadar port and the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor.

Gandhi also referred to former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee’s 2001 visit to Tehran, during which he had reaffirmed India’s longstanding ties with Iran.

Balancing ties in West Asia

Acknowledging that India’s relations with Israel have expanded in recent years across defence, agriculture and technology, Gandhi said that New Delhi’s ability to maintain ties with both Tehran and Tel Aviv gives it diplomatic space to urge restraint. However, she added, such space depends on credibility and a perception of principled engagement.

Highlighting the presence of nearly 10 million Indians in the Gulf region, she argued that India’s ability to safeguard its citizens during past crises — including conflicts in Iraq, Syria and Yemen — has depended on being viewed as an independent actor.

For a country that aspires to represent the Global South, Gandhi said, perceptions matter. Invoking the principle of “vasudhaiva kutumbakam”, she maintained that India’s civilisational ethos calls for justice, restraint and dialogue, especially at a time when the rules-based international order is under strain.

India News

DMK ex-Minister arrested, TVK mocks Stalin with Bengal Monitor Lizard jab

Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam’s IT wing attacked DMK chief MK Stalin after former minister Anbil Mahesh Poyyamozhi was arrested in an alleged Rs 100 crore corruption case involving approvals for private schools.

Published

on

MK Stalin

Tamil Nadu’s ruling Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) has targeted Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) president MK Stalin following the arrest of former state Education Minister Anbil Mahesh Poyyamozhi in an alleged corruption case involving private schools.

In a series of social media posts, the TVK IT wing accused Stalin of hypocrisy over corruption allegations against DMK leaders. One post used the phrase “Bengal monitor lizard” while questioning the DMK chief’s response to the case.

The political exchange followed Mahesh’s arrest by the Chennai Police’s Central Crime Branch on Monday, October 26, after the Madras High Court rejected his anticipatory bail petition.

TVK invokes Bengal monitor lizard remark

The TVK IT wing directly questioned Stalin over the corruption allegations involving members of his party.

“Stalin sir, who can’t be caught… Were you sleeping while in power? When your ministers have racked up so many corruption cases, why, sir, are you just flapping your mouth like a Bengal monitor lizard?” one of the posts said.

The party also published a longer message accusing the DMK of corruption across government departments and criticising its political messaging.

The posts were attacks by the ruling party’s IT wing, rather than judicial findings about the allegations against the DMK.

TVK recalls Anbil Mahesh’s remarks after Karur stampede

In its social media campaign, the TVK IT wing also referred to remarks made by Anbil Mahesh after the Karur stampede in 2025, in which 41 people were killed during a rally addressed by actor-turned-politician Vijay, the TVK chief.

At the time, Mahesh was Tamil Nadu’s Education Minister. A video showing him breaking down while speaking about repeated appeals for people to follow safety conditions at the gathering had circulated widely.

The TVK IT wing referenced those remarks in a post carrying the phrase “Conditions are followed”, accompanied by a winking emoji.

The post used the earlier remarks to criticise the DMK leadership in the aftermath of Mahesh’s arrest.

Why Anbil Mahesh was arrested

Mahesh was arrested in connection with an alleged Rs 100 crore corruption case involving money purportedly collected from private educational institutions in exchange for permanent recognition, licences and other government approvals.

The investigation followed allegations that representatives of a private schools’ association collected money while promising to facilitate official clearances for educational institutions.

According to the report, investigators identified 177 schools believed to have been affected by the alleged scheme.

Mahesh has denied the allegations and challenged the case against him. The allegations remain subject to legal proceedings.

The arrest came after the Madras High Court rejected his anticipatory bail petition on Monday. Mahesh has also approached the court seeking to quash the First Information Report registered against him.

MK Stalin calls arrest politically motivated

Reacting to Mahesh’s arrest, Stalin accused the TVK government of targeting a political opponent and attempting to divert public attention from the state’s governance issues.

He said the former minister had cooperated with the investigation and would face the allegations through legal channels.

The DMK has maintained that the action against Mahesh is politically motivated, while the case against the former minister concerns allegations of corruption and breach of trust.

The developments have led to a fresh exchange between the ruling TVK and the opposition DMK, with both sides making allegations against the other.

Continue Reading

India News

Rahul Gandhi’s convoy cars collide with ambulance in UP, several injured

Several people were injured after five vehicles in Rahul Gandhi’s convoy collided with an ambulance on the Purvanchal Expressway in Uttar Pradesh. The Congress MP was safe.

Published

on

Several people were injured after five vehicles in Congress MP Rahul Gandhi’s convoy collided with an ambulance on the Purvanchal Expressway in Uttar Pradesh on Monday, October 26.

The accident occurred near Haliyapur, around 100 km from Lucknow, according to police cited in the report. The five vehicles involved were travelling at the rear of the convoy. Rahul Gandhi was safe following the incident.

Party workers and security personnel accompanying the convoy were among those injured, according to the report.

Where the accident happened

The collision took place on the Purvanchal Expressway while Rahul Gandhi was travelling from Lucknow towards Sultanpur.

The Congress MP had arrived at Lucknow airport earlier in the day before beginning the journey to Sultanpur, where he was scheduled to appear before a special MP-MLA court.

The court was due to pronounce its verdict in a defamation case related to alleged remarks about Amit Shah, who was the BJP president at the time of the alleged comments.

Details of the defamation case

The case dates back to 2018, when Vijay Mishra, a BJP leader and former chairman of the Sultanpur District Cooperative Bank, filed a complaint against Rahul Gandhi over his alleged remarks about Amit Shah.

The remarks were reportedly made during a campaign rally in Bengaluru ahead of the 2018 Karnataka Assembly elections.

Rahul Gandhi was travelling to Sultanpur for the court proceedings when the accident involving vehicles at the rear of his convoy occurred.

Continue Reading

India News

Farooq Abdullah’s Kashmir remark wrong, says Ghulam Nabi Azad

Ghulam Nabi Azad has criticised Farooq Abdullah over his remarks on Pakistan’s role in the Kashmir issue, saying successive Indian governments have contributed to Jammu and Kashmir’s development since 1947.

Published

on

Ghulam Nabi Azad

Former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Ghulam Nabi Azad has disagreed with National Conference president Farooq Abdullah’s remarks about Pakistan’s role in the Kashmir issue, calling his statement incorrect. Azad also said successive governments at the Centre had contributed to Jammu and Kashmir’s development since Independence.

Azad was responding to Abdullah’s comments at a party event in Budgam district on Saturday. The National Conference chief had claimed that Pakistan’s continued efforts to raise the Kashmir issue at international forums had helped keep the region safe.

“I respect Farooq sahab, but his statement is completely incorrect. If anyone is an enemy of India and the people of J&K, it is Pakistan,” Azad wrote on X.

Azad also referred to the situation in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), pointing to protests by residents demanding their rights. He said successive central governments, from Jawaharlal Nehru to Narendra Modi, had contributed to Jammu and Kashmir’s development irrespective of their political affiliations.

Imran Ansari also criticises Farooq Abdullah

Shia leader and former minister Imran Ansari also criticised Abdullah’s remarks and urged people in Kashmir not to follow his example.

In a post on X, Ansari said Abdullah and a select group of leaders were free to make such statements. He alleged that ordinary Kashmiris expressing similar views would face detention under laws such as the Public Safety Act (PSA) or the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).

Ansari also described the National Conference leadership’s position as a “rented rebellion”, according to the report.

BJP demands action against National Conference chief

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) had also criticised Abdullah’s remarks and demanded police action against him.

BJP spokesperson Altaf Thakur described the statement as “seditious and anti-national”. He argued that a leader who had taken an oath under the Indian Constitution should not question the country’s intentions towards its own people while, in his view, lending political legitimacy to Pakistan’s position.

Thakur also accused Pakistan of contributing to decades of violence and targeted killings in Jammu and Kashmir through its alleged sponsorship of terrorism.

The criticism followed Abdullah’s remarks at the party event, where he credited Pakistan’s efforts to raise the Kashmir issue internationally with helping protect the region. Azad, however, rejected that assessment and maintained that Pakistan was an enemy of India and the people of Jammu and Kashmir.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com