English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

CBI director Alok Verma case: Acted to save CBI’s reputation, Centre tells Supreme Court

Published

on

cbi director alok verma case

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Claiming that the Centre had not violated any law in divesting CBI Director Alok Verma of his powers and sending him on leave, the Centre told the Supreme Court today (Wednesday, Dec 5) that it stepped in to save the agency’s reputation in view of extraordinary situation where the two top officers were “fighting like cats”.

Attorney General (AG) KK Venugopal was arguing on behalf of the Central government before the Supreme Court bench of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justices SK Kaul and KM Joseph which resumed hearing on Verma’s plea challenging Centre’s decision of Oct 24 to divest him of duties and sending him on leave.

The bench had, on Nov 29, heard submissions from lawyers of parties who have challenged the Centre’s decision, including senior advocate Fali Nariman (for Alok Verma), and posted the case for further submissions on Wednesday (December 5).

Presenting the Centre’s case, the AG said that the spat between the CBI director and his deputy, special director Rakesh Asthana was tarnishing the reputation of the country’s premier investigation agency.

It became essential for the government to step in when the two top officers of the CBI were “fighting like cats”, he said. “Government of India was watching with amazement as to what the top officers were doing, they were fighting like cats,” news agency PTI quoted him as saying.

“Dispute between CBI Director and Special Director was pulling down integrity and respect of the premier institution..Our main aim is to see that confidence of the public in this premiere institution (CBI) is restored,” he told the bench.

The apex court on Nov 29 had said it would first consider whether the government has the power to divest the CBI director of his duties under whatever circumstances or whether the selection committee headed by the Prime Minister should have been approached before moving against Verma on corruption allegations against him.

The court had made it clear that for now it was not going into the allegations and counter-allegations involving Verma and CBI’s No.2 officer Asthana, both of whom have been stripped of their powers and sent on leave following their bitter feud.

Today, KK Venugopal reiterated his assertions made during the last hearing in the case, that the Centre had not violated any law while sending Verma on leave.

During the last date of hearing, Venugopal had proceeded on the premise that the selection committee for appointing the CBI director was mandated to recommend names for the post of the agency’s chief or transferring him but it was the Centre that was the final appointing authority.

Venugopal argued that the central government had taken the decision to send Verma on leave after “due application of mind” and concluding that “a situation had arisen wherein the CBI director had to be divested of his responsibilities.”

The AG, however, insisted that by not referring the matter to the CBI director’s selection committee before acting against Verma, the Centre had not erred because the selection panel must be asked to carry out an inquiry only if the government wishes to transfer the CBI chief. He said, in Verma’s case, there was no transfer and that the petitioner continued to enjoy the perks of office.

Submitting that the Centre’s powers of superintendence, in its role as the appointing authority of the CBI director, Venugopal concluded his arguments.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC), picked up from where his senior law officer left off. Mehta emphasized on the CVC’s power of superintendence over the CBI director and said that the vigilance panel is mandated to oversee CBI cases registered under the Prevention of Corruption Act. He added that the Centre too was free to ask the CVC to initiate investigations against CBI officials if needed.

The bench posted the matter for next hearing on Thursday, December 6. Verma’s two-year tenure ends on January 31.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

EC to use death registration data to enhance electoral roll accuracy

Published

on

The Election Commission of India (ECI) announced on May 1, 2025, a significant step to improve the accuracy of electoral rolls by integrating electronic death registration data from the Registrar General of India.

This initiative aims to streamline the updation of voter lists, ensuring greater purity and efficiency. By accessing real-time death records, Electoral Registration Officers (EROs) can promptly identify deceased voters, enabling Booth Level Officers (BLOs) to conduct field verifications without relying on formal requests from family members.

This process leverages the ECI’s authority under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, and the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, to access such data, marking a shift toward technology-driven electoral management.

To enhance voter accessibility, the ECI has also revamped the design of Voter Information Slips (VIS).

The updated format prominently displays the voter’s serial and part numbers in a larger font, simplifying the process for voters to locate their polling stations and aiding polling officials in efficiently verifying names on the electoral roll. This redesign reflects the ECI’s commitment to making electoral processes more user-friendly, ensuring clarity and convenience on polling day.

Additionally, the ECI has mandated the issuance of standardized photo identity cards for all BLOs, who serve as the primary link between voters and the commission. These cards will make BLOs easily recognizable during house-to-house visits for voter verification and registration drives, fostering trust and confidence among citizens.

As grassroots representatives of the ECI, BLOs play a critical role in maintaining accurate voter records and facilitating voter engagement, and their identifiable presence strengthens public interaction.

This initiative aligns with broader efforts to modernize India’s electoral framework, incorporating digital tools to enhance transparency and efficiency.

By adopting electronic data integration and improving voter interface mechanisms, the ECI aims to uphold the integrity of the democratic process, ensuring that electoral rolls reflect accurate and current voter information. These measures are expected to bolster public trust in the electoral system, facilitating smoother and more inclusive elections across the country.

Continue Reading

Bollywood news

Shah Rukh Khan, Aamir Khan, Mohanlal join PM Modi at Waves summit 2025 for inaugural ceremony

Nagarjuna announced commemorative stamps honoring cinema legends Guru Dutt, Ritwik Ghatak, Salil Chowdhury, Raj Khosla, and P Bhanumati, building on tributes from the 55th IFFI.

Published

on

Waves-summit-2025-modi-srk-aamir-khan-mohanlal

On May 1, Mumbai’s Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC) hosted the grand inauguration of the WAVES Summit 2025, a four-day global event launched by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Organized by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, the summit aims to cement India’s role as a powerhouse in media, entertainment, and digital innovation, uniting creators, tech pioneers, industry titans, and policymakers from around the world.

The opening ceremony drew a dazzling array of Indian cinema luminaries, including Shah Rukh Khan, Rajinikanth, Amitabh Bachchan, Mohanlal, Aamir Khan, Akshay Kumar, Hema Malini, Ranbir Kapoor, Chiranjeevi, Nagarjuna, Anil Kapoor, Kartik Aaryan, and filmmaker SS Rajamouli.

Mohanlal kicked off the event with a captivating audio-visual showcase, while Rajinikanth delivered a poignant address, referencing the recent Pahalgam terror attack. Praising Modi as a “resilient leader,” he affirmed, “Despite calls to delay this event, I knew it would go on. My heartfelt support to the government and media industry.”

Shah Rukh Khan highlighted the summit’s global impact, stating, “Our stories are not just art but assets of immense value. Under PM Modi’s vision, WAVES is a transformative platform for creators and innovators worldwide.” Rajamouli echoed this, emphasizing India’s storytelling heritage: “Our narrative tradition spans millennia, yet we lag behind global peers like the US or Korea. WAVES can bridge that gap, uniting our efforts.” Ranbir Kapoor added, “This summit merges films, music, and cutting-edge tech. I’m honored to serve on its board.”

Kartik Aaryan, visibly moved, introduced Rajinikanth as “the nation’s superstar,” while Oscar-winning composer MM Keeravani performed a stirring inaugural anthem with a 30-member orchestra. Anil Kapoor unveiled Sankalp, a performance by Sharad Kelkar celebrating India’s cultural diversity. Nagarjuna announced commemorative stamps honoring cinema legends Guru Dutt, Ritwik Ghatak, Salil Chowdhury, Raj Khosla, and P Bhanumati, building on tributes from the 55th IFFI.

With stars like Deepika Padukone, Saif Ali Khan, Alia Bhatt, Vicky Kaushal, and AR Rahman also attending, WAVES underscores India’s growing influence in global entertainment, driven by its vibrant film industry and digital innovation.

Continue Reading

India News

Sharbat jihad row: Delhi HC says Ramdev beyond anyone’s control, lives in his own world

Hamdard’s counsel alleged that while promoting Patanjali’s “gulab sharbat,” Ramdev claimed profits from Rooh Afza were funneled into constructing madrasas and mosques, a statement deemed derogatory and misleading.

Published

on

ramdev

The Delhi High Court on Thursday sharply criticized yoga practitioner and entrepreneur Ramdev, declaring him “uncontrollable” and living “in his own world” after finding him in prima facie contempt of its earlier order.

The court’s ire stemmed from Ramdev’s controversial “sharbat jihad” remarks targeting Hamdard’s Rooh Afza, despite a prior directive on April 22 prohibiting him from making statements or sharing videos about Hamdard’s products.

Justice Amit Bansal, addressing the issue, stated, “His affidavit and the video clearly violate our order. This is prima facie contempt, and I will issue a notice summoning him.” The court was informed that Ramdev had posted a video with objectionable content, flouting its instructions. When Ramdev’s counsel requested a delay due to the unavailability of their lead lawyer, the court postponed the hearing briefly.

The case originates from a plea by Hamdard National Foundation India against Ramdev and Patanjali Foods Ltd., challenging his inflammatory remarks. On the previous hearing, the court had condemned Ramdev’s “sharbat jihad” comment as “indefensible” and conscience-shocking, prompting him to promise the immediate removal of related videos and social media posts.

Hamdard’s counsel alleged that while promoting Patanjali’s “gulab sharbat,” Ramdev claimed profits from Rooh Afza were funneled into constructing madrasas and mosques, a statement deemed derogatory and misleading.

The court’s strong remarks underscore its frustration with Ramdev’s defiance, setting the stage for a contentious legal battle as it seeks to enforce compliance and address the fallout from his provocative statements.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com