English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Instant ‘triple talaq’ is unconstitutional says SC in 3:2 split verdict, asks Centre to draft rules within 6 months

Published

on

Supreme court

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

If the Centre fails to draft the rules and have a legislation passed by Parliament within the set time frame, then the injunction on ‘triple talaq’ will continue since a majority of the five-judge Bench of the Apex Court has ruled the practice as “arbitrary and unconstitutional”.

At 10.55 AM, on Tuesday, the abominable and ‘unislamic’ practice of instant triple talaq was deemed as “manifestly arbitrary and unconstitutional” in a majority verdict of a five-judge Bench of the Supreme Court.

While three judges ruled in favour of an instant ban on the practice, two others – including Chief Justice of India JS Khehar – directed the Centre to draft rules on the validity of triple talaq and have a legislation passed by Parliament within six months.

However, since the Supreme Court has passed a majority verdict (in the opinion of Justices Kurien Joseph, Rohinton Nariman and UU Lalit) calling triple talaq or Talaq-ul-Biddat “unconstitutional”, should the Parliament fail to legislate on the matter within the 6-month timeframe, the ban on instant triple talaq will continue.

In a tersely worded opinion, Justices Nariman and Lalit said: “it is clear that this form of talas (Talaq-ul-Biddat) is manifestly arbitrary in the sense that the marital tie can be broken capriciously and whimsically by a Muslim man without any attempt at reconciliation…this form of talaq must, therefore, be held to be violative of the fundamental right contained under Article 14 of the Constitution… and must be struck down as being void.”

The historic verdict – its lure only slightly diminished because it wasn’t unanimous as Chief Justice Khehar and Justice S Abdul Nazeer thought it better to lob the controversial ball in the court of the government and Parliament – comes as a major relief to lakhs of Muslim women across India whose lives have been ruined due to the practice of triple talaq.

Shayara Banu, a key petitioner in the case, expectedly welcomed the judgement saying it was “a historic day for Muslim women and the government too should now bear the opinion of the three judges (who termed triple talaq as unconstitutional) in mind while framing an appropriate legislation that reaffirms the invalidity of the practice.”

The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) which had opposed both, a judicial intervention in what it called an “internal matter of the Muslim community” and any effort to ban triple talaq, has now been left with little option for a recourse. However, the legal committee of the AIMPLB will now study the verdict and give its opinion on it to the Board’s executive committee which will then discuss, at a meeting scheduled for September 10 in Bhopal, “the future course of action” available to it.

What needs to be born in mind, however, is that the order of the Supreme Court can be applied only to ban the practice of instant triple talaq or Talaq-ul-Biddat as only this was the matter under jurisdiction. The order does not state anything on banning, regulating or upholding the other form of divorce prevalent in the Islamic community – Talaq-ul-Sunnat or revocable divorce. Talaq-ul-Sunnat, which finds sanction in the Hadees/Hadith (the preachings of Prophet Mohammed), allows for a divorce to be revoked if the husband and wife reconcile their differences. Instant triple talaq, however, doesn’t find any mention in the Quran or the Hadees as has been pointed out by several Islamic scholars and legal experts during the hearing in the Supreme Court and also upheld by the three judges who termed it an “arbitrary” practice.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Centre asks Blinkit, Zepto and Swiggy to stop 10-minute delivery claims

The Centre has urged Blinkit, Zepto and Swiggy to remove 10-minute delivery claims, citing safety concerns for delivery partners, government sources said.

Published

on

10 minutes delivery

The Centre has asked quick commerce platforms such as Blinkit, Zepto and Swiggy to remove claims related to 10-minute deliveries, citing concerns over the safety of delivery partners, according to government sources.

The issue was discussed during a meeting between Union Labour Minister Mansukh Mandaviya and representatives of major food and grocery delivery aggregators. Executives from platforms including Zomato, Swiggy, Blinkit and Zepto were present at the meeting, sources said.

Safety of delivery partners discussed in meeting

Government sources indicated that the minister raised concerns about strict delivery timelines and their potential impact on the safety and well-being of delivery partners. Platforms were advised to prioritise safe working conditions instead of promoting ultra-fast delivery promises.

The discussion focused on delivery expectations, rider pressure and the broader responsibility of aggregators towards their workforce, sources added.

Blinkit revises tagline after government intervention

Following the meeting, Blinkit has revised its marketing tagline. The platform earlier promoted “10,000 plus products delivered in 10 minutes” but has now changed it to “30,000 plus products delivered at your doorstep,” according to sources.

The revision reflects a shift away from highlighting delivery speed as a key promise, in line with the concerns raised during the discussions.

The government is expected to continue engaging with aggregators on labour welfare and safety-related issues, sources said.

Continue Reading

India News

AI errors in voter list digitisation causing hardship during SIR, Mamata writes to EC chief

Mamata Banerjee has written to the chief election commissioner alleging that AI-driven digitisation errors in electoral rolls are causing hardship, harassment and distress to genuine voters during the SIR process in West Bengal.

Published

on

mamta banerjee

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again written to Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, alleging that errors arising from AI-driven digitisation of the 2002 electoral rolls are causing widespread hardship to genuine voters during the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise in the state.

In her fifth letter since the SIR process began, Banerjee claimed that the use of artificial intelligence tools to digitise older voter lists led to serious inaccuracies in electors’ personal details. According to her, these errors have resulted in large-scale data mismatches, with many genuine voters being wrongly flagged as having “logical discrepancies”.

The chief minister accused the Election Commission of disregarding statutory processes that had been followed over the past two decades. She said voters were now being forced to re-establish their identity despite corrections having been made earlier through quasi-judicial hearings.

Calling the approach arbitrary and illogical, Banerjee alleged that it went against the constitutional spirit by effectively disowning the commission’s own past actions and mechanisms. She further claimed that voters submitting documents during the SIR exercise were not being given proper acknowledgements, terming the procedure “fundamentally flawed”.

Raising concerns over the nature of hearings, Banerjee said the SIR process had become largely mechanical and overly dependent on technical data, lacking sensitivity, human judgment and compassion. She argued that such an approach undermines democratic values and the constitutional framework.

Highlighting the human impact of the exercise, the chief minister claimed that the revision process had already seen 77 deaths, four suicide attempts and 17 cases of hospitalisation. She attributed these incidents to fear, intimidation and excessive workload caused by what she described as an unplanned exercise by the Election Commission.

Banerjee also criticised the treatment of several eminent citizens, alleging that they were subjected to harassment during the process. She further expressed concern over the handling of cases involving women voters, particularly those who had changed their surnames after marriage or shifted to their matrimonial homes.

According to her, women electors were being questioned and summoned to prove their identity, reflecting a lack of social sensitivity and amounting to an insult to women and genuine voters. She questioned whether a constitutional authority should treat half of the electorate in such a manner.

Urging immediate corrective steps, Banerjee called on the Election Commission to address the issues arising from the SIR exercise to end what she described as harassment and agony for both citizens and officials, and to safeguard democratic rights.

Continue Reading

India News

Communist Party of China delegation visits BJP headquarters in Delhi

A delegation from the Communist Party of China, led by Vice Minister Sun Haiyan, visited the BJP headquarters in Delhi and held discussions on inter-party communication.

Published

on

China delegation visits BJP office

A delegation from the Communist Party of China (CPC), led by Sun Haiyan, Vice Minister of the International Department of the CPC Central Committee (IDCPC), visited the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) headquarters in Delhi on Monday.

During the visit, the Chinese delegation held discussions with a BJP team headed by party general secretary Arun Singh. The talks focused on ways to advance inter-party communication and engagement between the BJP and the CPC.

Sharing details of the meeting, BJP foreign affairs department in-charge Vijay Chauthaiwale said the interaction involved an in-depth exchange on strengthening party-to-party dialogue. He confirmed the visit in a post on social media, stating that the CPC delegation was received at the BJP head office as part of ongoing inter-party interactions.

The Chinese Ambassador to India, Xu Feihong, was also present during the meeting, accompanying the CPC delegation.

According to Chauthaiwale, the visit was led by Sun Haiyan in her capacity as Vice Minister of the IDCPC, underscoring the importance attached to party-level exchanges between the two sides.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com