English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Judge Loya death case: CJI says there will be ground for suspicion if Section 174 CrPC has not been duly complied with

Published

on

supreme court

The Supreme Court bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud on Monday (February 12) continued hearing the plea seeking independent probe into the mysterious death of Justice B G Loya who was handling the Sohrabuddin Seikh fake encounter killing case.

In Monday (February 19) senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, representing the State of Maharashtra, continued his defence.

He said that the whole of 30th, they (the judges) stayed in Nagpur AND MOVED TO Ravi Bhawan that night. At night the judge (Loya) had complained of distress and was rushed to Dande hospital where they spent 15-20 minutes and an ECG was taken.

Waikar also reaches there, continued Rohatgi. “There they met Dr Pankaj Harkutt who is a cardiologist and are advised to go to Medetirina which is 2-2.5 km from there. Unfortunately at the next hospital he was declared “brought dead”, hence he did not die in Medetirina.

“If we had to discount everything what the four judges said then we have the postmortem report. The postmortem was done in a government hospital and then the body was taken to Ghategaon,” he said.

Then Rohatgi was back at castigating the published article. He said: “The intention behind the appearance of the article is questionable itself.” He referred to page 19 and submitted the Marathi version first. “Whatever is written in the article appears to be false and unverified, which appeared three years after the death.”

Then Rohatgi read out a postmortem report – Department of Forensic Science, Govt of India, Nagpur report. “As per police, at 1:12 am he suddenly complained of chest pain. At 4:00 am, he was brought to the hospital and was declared dead.”

Also, the report talks about the jurisdiction of the police station. The main centre for the postmortem is Sitamarhi. Then the counsel submitted various angles of the reason why any particular hospital was chosen.

At the bottom of the page is the nakal bayan (or witness) who is Prashant Rathi. The time of death is 16:00 hours. Whereas in item 1, the time of death was 4:00 hours.

The bill of Medetirina is referred to, wherein Dr Pankaj Harkutt is the referred doctor. “Judge Srikant Kulkarni was present when Judge Loya was admitted to the hospital,” Rohatgi reads. “When the ailing judge’s name was entered as Brij Mohan and not Brij Gopal. Hence the change in name in medical report is just a mistake of dictation on the part of judge Kulkarni.”

He referred to the CG fiasco. “For a layman, any impulse taken by the ECG machine nodule, the ECG is recorded. Hence, one of the judges said that the ECG was taken and recorded. ECG was not done is not a conclusive fact in this case. There is disparity in the views regarding ECG.”

Page 59A was referred to, containing the statement of the father of Judge Loya.

He also tried to debunk the political angle, saying that the “Ishwar Vahiti concerned here was Justice Loya’s friend and not the one who is associated with the RSS.”

Senior counsel Indira Jaising, on the opposing side, submitted that nobody denies in this case that ECG was not attempted but it could not be done. She said that the article was preceded by a dismissal order of the person by the Supreme Court, which happened 2-3 months ago.”

Rohtagi submitted that “only because Vahiti  was a friend and that too close, he was handed over Judge Loya’s body. He established his close relationship with Judge Loya in court.”

He explained: “Maharashtra is divided into ten commissionarates and 67 districts.” He place before the court a judgment in which in Maharashtra special powers are given to ACPs to conduct the investigation. He submitted that the investigation was carried out properly and there was nothing suspicious about the natural death of the Judge Loya which was only due to heart attack. He agains raised the question as to why a petition has been file in the Supreme Court after a long time.

He submitted that there was nothing wrong in procedure as well, because as per the Bombay police manual of 1959 a police officer is authorised to conduct investigation in the case of suspicious deaths.

Senior advocate Dushyant Dave stated his submissions. He said that the pressure which is built in this case is important to be considered and so it becomes important to issue judicial notice. He also said that things were not always as it appears on the record and as this case is related with the death of a judge. “Hence it should be considered seriously.”

He said that it was necessary that documents are brought under oath. “This is not a politically motivated matter,” he said.

Rohatgi interfered, saying: “It’s not written anywhere that in every writ petition, rejoinders, etc must be recorded.”

To which Dave said: “Until we have the documents on the affidavits, justice won’t be served because the judges will not be able to judge independently. The State has nothing else to show. How can Rathi reply on 23rd itself?”

At this the CJI commented: “The question is whether section 174 CrPC has been duly complied with or not. This could be a ground of suspicion.”

Dave said: “The state failed in providing proper security to Judge Loya, did not even provide proper medical services, also, post death, the real cause of death was not figured out by the state.”

The matter is again listed for March 5

India News

Amit Shah sets 2029 deadline to make India drug-free

Union Home Minister Amit Shah has set December 31, 2029 as the deadline for India’s fight against drugs, urging states to focus on dismantling trafficking networks rather than only recording seizures.

Published

on

Union Home Minister Amit Shah has set December 31, 2029 as the deadline for India’s campaign against drugs, calling on states and Union Territories to move beyond recording seizures and focus on dismantling the networks behind narcotics trafficking.

Speaking at the third National Conference of Anti-Narcotics Task Force Heads in New Delhi on Tuesday, Mr Shah said India would not allow drugs to enter or leave the country.

“Neither will we allow a single gram of drugs to enter India, nor will we allow a single gram of drugs to go out,” he said.

The conference brought together police chiefs from 36 states and Union Territories as the government outlined its roadmap for tackling the country’s drug problem.

Amit Shah asks states to focus on drug networks

Mr Shah said drug seizures alone should not be treated as the measure of success. He called for a shift from meetings to missions, reports to results and seizures to dismantling the networks responsible for drug trafficking.

Districts have been identified as the frontline units in the strategy. They are to be assessed based on whether they are involved in drug production or entry, serve as transit corridors or primarily face drug consumption.

The response would then be tailored according to the nature of the threat in each district.

The Home Minister also stressed the need to follow the money generated by narcotics trafficking, including through investigations into bank accounts and shell transactions that help sustain drug networks.

Synthetic drugs, darknet and crypto payments in focus

The government is also preparing for emerging methods used by drug traffickers, with synthetic drugs, darknet marketplaces, cryptocurrency payments and dead-drop deliveries identified as areas requiring greater attention.

Mr Shah urged states to develop specialised teams capable of investigating these newer forms of narcotics trafficking.

The government also wants foreign nationals involved in drug supply chains to face deportation and blacklisting, while those operating supply networks into India from abroad are to be pursued for extradition.

2026-2029 drug control roadmap

The government’s Vision Document 2026-2029 is based on four pillars: enforcement and intelligence, control of precursor chemicals and synthetic drugs, demand and harm reduction, and capacity building.

According to the report, the document contains more than 100 individual targets.

The Nashamukt Mitra programme is another part of the campaign. Nearly 47,000 volunteers have registered so far, with a target of reaching one lakh volunteers. The programme plans to take awareness activities to around 10 lakh schools and colleges.

The government has also launched new television advertisements against drug use, redesigned the Narcotics Control Bureau website and laid the foundation stones for NCB zonal complexes in Lucknow and Dehradun.

Mr Shah linked the anti-drug campaign to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s vision of a developed India by 2047, arguing that protecting the country’s young population from narcotics is essential to that goal.

Continue Reading

India News

J&K Assembly uproar over Maharaja Hari Singh, Sheikh Abdullah holidays

A holiday row over Maharaja Hari Singh and Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah triggered an uproar in the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly, with BJP and NC members raising competing slogans.

Published

on

The Jammu and Kashmir Assembly witnessed a heated exchange on Tuesday over public holidays associated with Maharaja Hari Singh and Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah, with members of the ruling National Conference (NC) and BJP raising slogans in support of the respective leaders.

The issue was raised a day before the September 23 public holiday marking Maharaja Hari Singh’s birth anniversary.

NC legislator Abdul Majid Larmi demanded that the holiday for Maharaja Hari Singh’s birth anniversary be withdrawn if the public holiday for Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah’s birth anniversary was not restored.

The demand led to an uproar in the House, with BJP members raising slogans in support of Maharaja Hari Singh and accusing the NC of insulting his legacy. NC legislators responded with slogans supporting Sheikh Abdullah.

What happened over the holiday issue

The Centre withdrew the public holiday marking Sheikh Abdullah’s birth anniversary after the abrogation of Article 370 in 2019. His birth anniversary is observed on December 5.

The government also discontinued the public holiday on July 13, which was observed as Martyrs’ Day in the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir.

In contrast, September 23, Maharaja Hari Singh’s birth anniversary, is now observed as a public holiday in Jammu and Kashmir.

PDP members also joined the discussion and demanded the restoration of the July 13 public holiday.

Speaker says he has no power over holidays

As slogan-shouting continued in the Assembly, Speaker Abdul Rahim Rather attempted to calm the members.

The Speaker said that the authority to declare or withdraw public holidays did not fall within his jurisdiction.

Why July 13 was observed as Martyrs’ Day

July 13 was traditionally observed as a public holiday in Jammu and Kashmir. Official functions were held at the Martyrs’ Graveyard to commemorate the 22 people killed during the 1931 uprising against the Dogra monarchy under British rule.

Following the abrogation of Article 370 and the bifurcation of the erstwhile state into two Union Territories in 2019, July 13 was removed from the list of public holidays. Official commemorations and ceremonial police tributes were also discontinued.

The 1931 killings and the unrest that followed led to the appointment of two commissions to examine grievances of the Muslim community in Kashmir and eventually contributed to limited political reforms.

The first Assembly elections in Jammu and Kashmir were held in 1934, although the Maharaja retained extensive powers over key matters at the time.

Continue Reading

India News

Odisha SIR: Over 20 lakh voters removed from electoral roll

Odisha’s final electoral roll has been published after the Special Intensive Revision, with 20.56 lakh electors removed following verification.

Published

on

SIR

The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Odisha has been completed, with the final electoral roll published after a verification process that resulted in the removal of 20.56 lakh electors.

According to Odisha Chief Electoral Officer S Gopalan, the SIR exercise began on May 30, 2026. At the beginning of the exercise, the electoral roll had 3,13,99,000 electors.

During the first phase, 20.12 lakh voters were removed for various reasons. This included 8.32 lakh electors who were found to be dead, 8.08 lakh who had permanently shifted, 2 lakh who were absent and 1.58 lakh who had duplicate entries.

Notices issued during verification

After the draft electoral roll was published on July 5, further verification was carried out for voters whose details could not be mapped or contained discrepancies.

Around 13 lakh electors whose details could not be mapped in the 2002 roll were issued notices. Another 45.37 lakh electors with logical errors in their entries also received notices.

In total, 58.36 lakh electors were issued notices during this process. Following hearings, 24,000 were found ineligible and removed from the roll.

Claims and objections processed

The electoral authorities also received claims and objections during the revision.

Around 57,000 Form 7 applications were received. Of these, 20,000 were found to be valid and the corresponding names were removed.

At the same time, eligible voters were added to the final roll. Around 2.74 lakh Form 6 applications and 16,000 Form 8 applications resulted in about 2.90 lakh additions.

After the verification, deletions and additions, Odisha’s final electoral roll stood at 3,16,32,754 electors.

The final roll includes about 1,61,30,000 male voters, 1,54,99,000 female voters and 2,774 third-gender electors.

Continuous updating resumes

With the completion of the SIR exercise, the regular process of updating the electoral roll has resumed.

According to the Odisha CEO, voters can now use Forms 6, 7 and 8 to apply for inclusion, deletion or corrections in the electoral roll. Applications can be submitted online or through Booth Level Officers.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com