English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Those who took decision on transfer must answer how it was done: Karnataka HC judge Patel after resignation

Published

on

Karnataka High Court

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Justice Jayant Patel had resigned after learning that he was being transferred to Allahabad HC where he would have been third in queue for chief justice post

Justice Jayant Patel of the Karnataka High Court, who famously ordered a CBI enquiry into the Ishrat Jahan fake encounter case while he was a judge in the Gujarat high court, had sent in his resignation letter to Karnataka’s Chief Justice SK Mukherjee, on Monday. Justice Patel’s decision to quit – 10 months before he was set to retire –had come after he learned that he was being transferred to the Allahabad High Court, a move that would have ensured that he isn’t promoted to the rank of Chief Justice in Karnataka – or Allahabad for that matter.

While his resignation has created a flutter in the legal community of Karnataka, sent ripples across India’s judiciary and reignited the debate on the lack of transparency in the manner in which judges are appointed, transferred or elevated, all that Justice Patel has to say on the chain of events he has triggered is that those who took the decision on his transfer “must answer” on how this was done.

Had Justice Patel not been transferred to the Allahabad High Court he would have, by convention, been elevated to the rank of Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court. Incumbent Karnataka Chief Justice Mukherjee is set to retire on October 9, and Justice Patel was the next senior-most judge in the court. However, had he moved to the Allahabad High Court, Justice Patel would have been the third seniormost and with just 10 months left for his retirement, he would have effectively been out of the race for a promotion.

In an interview to the Indian Express, Justice Patel declined to attribute motives to the Supreme Court collegiums for deciding to transfer him to the Allahabad High Court and robbing him of his elevation but said: “Those who have taken decisions must answer how it was done. I cannot say anything”.

The judge, who enjoys support and respect across bar associations of Gujarat – where he had briefly been elevated as Acting Chief Justice before being transferred to the southern state as a regular judge – and Karnataka refused to link the denial of his confirmation as Chief Justice to his landmark decision of ordering a CBI probe in the Ishrat Jahan encounter case in 2011.

“When I became aware about my contemplated transfer to the Allahabad High Court, I decided to resign. I have already sent my resignation to the President of India. From yesterday, I am relieved of responsibilities. How it happened and what happened is for you to consider,” the Indian Express quoted Justice Patel as saying.

“I had no desire to be shifted to Allahabad. I have worked with dignity for 16 years as a judge, and for (the remaining) ten months why should I go to another place,” Justice Patel added.

Clearly anguished over being forced to resign and being denied what many feel was his rightful due, Justice Patel said: “What I feel is that I did my duty as per the oath of my office. Punishment is ultimately in God’s hands. One thing I can say is that wherever I worked, it has been with all sincerity and strictly as per my oath of office.”

Asked specifically if he would have been elevated had he not ordered the CBI probe in the Ishrat Jahan encounter – a case that had pointed fingers at the then Gujarat chief minister and now Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the then minister of state for home in Gujarat, Amit Shah, who is now the BJP national president – Justice Patel said: “Everyday we take decisions. We do not look at whether the case is about X or Y and we cannot decide a matter like that. We do not see the name of the party and decide the course. This is what is expected of us. I don’t think this could be the reason (for my transfer) but I cannot answer as the decisions were taken by someone else.’’

Senior Supreme Court advocates Dushyant Dave and Yatin Oza have both indicated that Justice Patel was denied the Chief Justice’s rank on account of his decision to order a CBI probe into the Ishrat Jahan case.

Advocates who met him after news of his resignation broke on Tuesday in an effort to get him to reconsider his decision said that Jutice Patel had conveyed that matters were beyond reconsideration.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

RN Ravi triggers outrage after Jai Shri Ram remark at student event, academic bodies, political leaders demand Tamil Nadu Governor’s removal

Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi is in a fresh controversy after allegedly urging students to chant ‘Jai Shri Ram’. This follows a Supreme Court verdict that deemed his delay in clearing state Bills illegal.

Published

on

Tamil Nadu governor RN Ravi

Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi, already under sharp criticism following a Supreme Court verdict that called his delay in assenting to key state legislation “illegal” and “arbitrary”, has now courted fresh controversy. The Governor is alleged to have asked students to chant “Jai Shri Ram” during a recent public function — drawing sharp reactions from academics and opposition leaders.

The incident, coming shortly after the apex court rebuked the Governor for withholding 10 Bills passed by the Tamil Nadu Assembly for over three years, has intensified demands for his removal from office.

The State Platform for Common School System – Tamil Nadu (SPCSS-TN) issued a strong statement accusing Governor Ravi of violating his constitutional oath under Article 159, which obligates Governors to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution.

“Mr RN Ravi failed to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions. He should be removed from the Office of Governor of Tamil Nadu forthwith,” the statement read.

The group described the act of urging students to chant a religious slogan as an inappropriate imposition in a secular academic space, and contrary to the principles enshrined in the Constitution.

Senior Congress leader Sasikanth Senthil also took to social media platform X (formerly Twitter) to criticise Governor Ravi.

“After being slammed by the Supreme Court and blocked by the State Government, he’s now resorting to stunts like making students chant ‘Jai Shri Ram’ just to irritate the system,” Senthil wrote.

He further accused the Governor of attempting to send a “dangerous message” of arrogance and defiance, undermining both judicial authority and constitutional norms.

As of now, Raj Bhavan has not issued any clarification or response to the allegations, despite repeated attempts by media outlets to reach out.

This row follows a landmark Supreme Court ruling earlier in the week where the bench criticised Governor RN Ravi for withholding assent to 10 state Bills passed by the Tamil Nadu Assembly — some pending for over three years. The court said the Governor had not acted in good faith and described the delay as unconstitutional.

In a significant move, the court also ruled that the Bills shall be deemed cleared from the date they were resent to the Governor for a second time, effectively overriding the delay.

Continue Reading

India News

Who was Hemraj Meena, the Pulwama martyr whose daughter’s wedding was attended by Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla?

Birla took on the role of the uncle for Reena’s mother, Madhubala, and performed the Hindu wedding custom known as ‘mayra’.

Published

on

Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla fulfilled a promise he made six years ago by participating in the wedding rituals of the daughter of a martyr from Pulwama, held in Kota, Rajasthan. He took part in the traditional ceremonies typically performed by the bride’s uncle or her mother’s brother.

Birla took on the role of the uncle for Reena’s mother, Madhubala, and performed the Hindu wedding custom known as ‘mayra’. He is the representative of the Kota-Bundi constituency in Parliament and attended the wedding of 25-year-old Reena, the daughter of Hemraj Meena, who died in the Pulwama attack, in the Sangod area of Kota.

Who was Hemraj Meena?

Hemraj Meena served as a head constable in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) and was from Vinod Kalan village in Sangod, Rajasthan. He is survived by his wife, Madhubala Meena, and their daughter Reena. Hemraj lost his life in the 2019 terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir’s Pulwama.

In the wake of Hemraj’s death, Om Birla pledged to support his family. Since then, he has been actively involved in their lives, celebrating festivals and providing assistance.

At the wedding, Birla played a significant role by presenting a ceremonial ‘odhni’ and other gifts to Madhubala, while also honouring the memory of Hemraj Meena and taking part in numerous wedding rituals. State Energy Minister Heeralal Nagar accompanied him at the event.

Birla expressed his emotions about the occasion by sharing photos from the ceremony on X (formerly Twitter). He stated, “My heart is filled with pride and joy that our daughter Reena is now going to start her new life. This moment is not only emotionally significant for the family but also a source of pride, as it reflects the love, values, and aspirations that have come to fruition. The unique sacrifice and unwavering dedication of Martyr Hemraj Meena Ji to our nation continue to inspire us all.”

He concluded by wishing for Reena’s married life to be filled with love, trust, and harmony, praying that she always finds happiness, prosperity, and respect in her new journey.

Continue Reading

Cricket news

IPL 2025: RCB goes green against Rajasthan Royals in Jaipur, here’s why

RCB took the field in green jerseys against Rajasthan Royals in IPL 2025, continuing their campaign to promote environmental awareness and tree plantation.

Published

on

RCB green jersey

In a visually distinct appearance, Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) took the field in green jerseys instead of their traditional red-and-black colours during their IPL 2025 match against Rajasthan Royals at the Sawai Mansingh Stadium in Jaipur on Sunday. The reason? A sustainability campaign aimed at encouraging the plantation of more trees.

Speaking at the toss, RCB captain Rajat Patidar explained the significance of the green kit.

“This (green jersey) is to raise awareness to plant more trees,” he said, confirming that RCB would bowl first and play an unchanged XI for match 28 of the tournament.

RCB’s green jersey initiative is not new to fans of the franchise. It has been a recurring feature over multiple seasons of the IPL, often worn during one designated home or away game. The objective is to promote environmental consciousness, especially in urban centres, by delivering a simple yet powerful message — “Go Green.”

This year, the campaign gained added visibility with the team playing in Jaipur, and the vibrant green jerseys provided a sharp contrast against Rajasthan Royals’ trademark pink kit.

Rajat Patidar won the toss and opted to bowl against RR in their crucial IPL 2025 match in Jaipur. Batting first, Rajasthan Royals posted a total of 173 with the help of Yashasvi Jaiswal’s 75. Dhruv Jurel added a late flourish to the RR innings, smasing 35 off 23.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com