English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Trump says US wants return of Ukraine aid money

The coming weeks will be critical in determining whether the two allies can bridge their differences and forge a deal that addresses both their interests—or whether the growing tensions will further complicate an already fraught relationship.

Published

on

Trump

In a striking development in U.S.-Ukraine relations, President Donald Trump has revealed efforts to secure compensation for the billions of dollars in aid provided to Ukraine during its ongoing conflict with Russia. The announcement came during his address at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) near Washington, where he emphasized the need for Ukraine to reciprocate the substantial financial support it has received from the United States.

“I’m trying to get the money back, or secured,” Trump told CPAC delegates. “We’re asking for rare earth minerals, oil, anything we can get. It’s just not fair that we’ve put up so much without getting something in return. I think we’re pretty close to a deal, and we better be, because this has been a horrible situation.”

The remarks underscore a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy under Trump, who has sought to recalibrate Washington’s approach to the Ukraine crisis. His administration is currently negotiating a mineral resources deal with Kyiv, which Trump views as a form of reimbursement for the aid provided by his predecessor, Joe Biden. However, the proposal has sparked resistance from Ukrainian officials, who argue that the terms are overly demanding and lack clarity.

According to reports, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is “not ready” to sign the deal in its current form. A Ukrainian official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told AFP that Kyiv is seeking revisions to the draft agreement. “In its current form, the president is not ready to accept it. We are still trying to make changes and add constructiveness,” the source said.

Ukraine is particularly insistent on including security guarantees in any agreement with the United States, as it continues to fend off Russia’s nearly three-year-long invasion. The negotiations come amid escalating tensions between Trump and Zelensky, with the U.S. president recently labelling his Ukrainian counterpart a “dictator” and urging him to “move fast” to end the war.

The Kiel Institute, a German economic research body, estimates that total U.S. assistance to Ukraine, including financial, humanitarian, and military aid, amounts to approximately 114.2 billion euros ($119.8 billion) from 2022 through 2024.

Despite the friction, talks between the two nations remain ongoing, according to a senior Ukrainian official. The negotiations are unfolding against the backdrop of Ukraine’s struggle to hold its ground against Russian forces. On Saturday, Moscow’s defence ministry claimed the capture of Novolyubivka in the eastern Lugansk region, further underscoring the challenges faced by Kyiv’s military.

As Ukraine prepares to mark the third anniversary of Russia’s invasion on Monday, international support for Kyiv remains a focal point. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer reiterated the United Kingdom’s “ironclad support” for Ukraine during a phone call with Zelensky on Saturday.

Meanwhile, British Foreign Secretary David Lammy announced that the UK will unveil a significant package of sanctions against Russia on Monday, coinciding with the invasion anniversary. In London, thousands of people marched in solidarity with Ukraine on Saturday, reflecting strong public support for Kyiv in the UK.

As the war enters its fourth year, the outcome of the U.S.-Ukraine negotiations could have far-reaching implications for the conflict and the broader geopolitical landscape. While Trump’s push for compensation highlights his administration’s transactional approach to foreign policy, Ukraine’s insistence on security guarantees underscores the high stakes for a nation fighting for its survival.

The coming weeks will be critical in determining whether the two allies can bridge their differences and forge a deal that addresses both their interests—or whether the growing tensions will further complicate an already fraught relationship.

India News

Amit Shah counters delimitation concerns, says southern states to gain Lok Sabha seats

Amit Shah assures Parliament that southern states will gain Lok Sabha seats after delimitation, countering opposition criticism during the women’s reservation debate.

Published

on

Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday addressed concerns over the proposed delimitation exercise, asserting in the Lok Sabha that southern states will not lose representation but instead see an increase in their number of seats.

His remarks came during a heated debate linked to the implementation of women’s reservation, where opposition parties have raised fears that population-based delimitation could reduce the political weight of southern states.

Shah rejected these claims, calling them misleading, and said the proposed framework ensures fairness while expanding the overall strength of the Lok Sabha.

Seat count to rise with expansion of Lok Sabha

The government has indicated that the total number of Lok Sabha seats could increase significantly as part of the delimitation process. In this expanded House, the combined representation of southern states is expected to rise from 129 seats at present to around 195 seats.

Shah emphasised that no state will lose seats in absolute terms, and the exercise is designed to reflect population changes while maintaining balance across regions.

State-wise projections shared in Parliament

During his address, Shah also provided indicative figures for individual southern states, suggesting notable increases in representation. According to the projections:

  • Tamil Nadu could see its seats rise substantially
  • Kerala, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to gain additional seats
  • Karnataka’s representation may increase as well

These figures were presented to counter the argument that delimitation would disproportionately favour northern states.

Political debate intensifies over linkage with women’s quota

The delimitation exercise has been closely linked to the rollout of women’s reservation, which proposes one-third seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies.

Opposition leaders have questioned this linkage, arguing that tying reservation to delimitation could delay its implementation and raise federal concerns. Some leaders have also warned that the move could impact national unity if apprehensions among states are not addressed.

The government, however, maintains that the reforms are necessary to ensure equitable representation and to align the electoral system with demographic realities.

Centre dismisses ‘false narrative’ on southern states

Shah reiterated that concerns about southern states losing influence are unfounded. He said the delimitation process will increase representation across regions and described the criticism as a “false narrative” aimed at creating confusion.

The issue is expected to remain a key flashpoint as Parliament continues discussions on the women’s reservation framework and related legislative changes.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com