English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Rahul Gandhi Attacks Centre over G RAM G bill, calls it an attack on MGNREGA’s core principles

Rahul Gandhi has strongly opposed the G RAM G bill, accusing the Modi government of undermining MGNREGA and shifting the financial burden of rural employment schemes onto states.

Published

on

Rahul-Gandhi

Congress MP and Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi on Monday sharpened his attack on the Centre over the introduction of the G RAM G bill in the Lok Sabha, alleging that the proposed law weakens the foundations of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) and undermines the rights of the rural poor.

The bill, formally titled the Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) Bill, 2025, has been brought in to replace MGNREGA, which was enacted in 2005 under the UPA government.

Reacting to the move, Rahul Gandhi described the legislation as an “insult to the ideals of Mahatma Gandhi” and accused the Narendra Modi-led government of attempting to dismantle a scheme that guarantees livelihood security to millions of rural households.

Rahul Gandhi’s sharp criticism of the G RAM G bill

In a post on X, Gandhi alleged that Prime Minister Modi has consistently opposed the ideas associated with Mahatma Gandhi and has been trying to weaken MGNREGA since coming to power in 2014. He asserted that the Congress would oppose any attempt to dilute or dismantle the employment guarantee framework.

“Modiji has a deep hatred for two things – the ideas of Mahatma Gandhi and the rights of the poor,” Gandhi said, calling MGNREGA a living embodiment of Gandhi’s vision of village self-rule. He also highlighted the role of the scheme as an economic shield for rural India, particularly during the COVID period.

According to Gandhi, the Centre is now “determined to wipe out MGNREGA completely” by replacing it with a new framework that centralises power and alters the funding structure.

Opposition protests in Parliament

The introduction of the G RAM G bill triggered protests from several opposition MPs inside and outside Parliament. Congress MPs, including Priyanka Gandhi Vadra and Shashi Tharoor, raised objections to key provisions of the bill, particularly the removal of Mahatma Gandhi’s name from the scheme.

Opposition leaders argued that MGNREGA is rooted in the right to employment, decentralised decision-making by villages, and a funding structure where the Centre bears the full wage cost and most of the material expenses.

How G RAM G differs from MGNREGA

Rahul Gandhi pointed out that under MGNREGA, the Centre pays 100 per cent of wages for unskilled workers and 75 per cent of material costs, ensuring steady employment based on demand.

The new G RAM G bill proposes a shift to normative funding, under which states will have to bear 40 per cent of the overall costs. Gandhi claimed this would reduce work availability once budgets are exhausted or during crop harvest seasons, leaving rural workers without employment for extended periods.

The funding ratio for northeastern and Himalayan states has been set at 90:10, while union territories will be fully funded by the Centre. Of the estimated annual expenditure of Rs 1.51 lakh crore, the central government’s share is projected at Rs 95,692 crore.

Leaders from several opposition parties, including those from a key BJP ally, have also expressed concerns over the increased financial burden on states.

Government’s defence of the bill

Government sources have maintained that the G RAM G bill aligns with the broader ‘Viksit Bharat 2047’ vision. According to them, the shift from a demand-based to a normative funding model brings the scheme in line with budgeting practices followed for other central government programmes.

However, the sharp political pushback indicates that the replacement of MGNREGA is set to remain a major flashpoint in Parliament in the coming days.

India News

Captain Sumit Kapoor was not scheduled to fly Ajit Pawar plane on crash day, friends say

Captain Sumit Kapoor, who died in the plane crash that killed Ajit Pawar, was not scheduled to fly the aircraft and had filled in for another pilot delayed by traffic, friends said.

Published

on

Captain sumit kapoor

Captain Sumit Kapoor, one of the five people killed in the plane crash that claimed the life of Ajit Pawar in Baramati, was not originally assigned to operate the flight, according to his friends. They said Kapoor had stepped in at the last moment after another pilot was delayed due to traffic.

Speaking during Kapoor’s funeral in Delhi, his friends said the veteran pilot had returned from Hong Kong just a few days earlier and received instructions to fly the aircraft only hours before the incident. He was tasked with flying Pawar from Mumbai to Baramati for election-related engagements.

The Learjet 45, operated by a Delhi-based aviation company, took off at around 8 am with Pawar and three others on board. The aircraft crashed around 8:45 am while attempting a second approach to Baramati Airport.

All five people on board died in the crash. The victims included Captain Kapoor, co-pilot Captain Shambhavi Pathak, flight attendant Pinky Mali, and Pawar’s security guard Vidip Jadhav.

Sources familiar with the early stage of the investigation said a preliminary probe pointed to a possible pilot misjudgement during landing amid poor visibility. Technical issues are also being examined as part of the ongoing inquiry.

However, Kapoor’s friends rejected suggestions of pilot error, saying he was highly experienced and deeply committed to flying. They stressed that the likelihood of him making a serious mistake was minimal and called for a thorough and transparent investigation into the crash.

Remembering Kapoor, his friends described him as a kind and dedicated professional who loved flying. They said aviation ran in his family, with both his son and son-in-law also working as pilots. Kapoor is survived by his son and daughter, both married, and a brother who runs a business in Gurugram.

One of his friends said Kapoor’s body was identified by a bracelet he was wearing, while another said the news of his death was difficult to accept. A close associate also recalled speaking to Kapoor after his return from Hong Kong, during which the pilot had advised him to take special care of his health.

Continue Reading

India News

Ajit Pawar aimed to reunite NCP factions as goodwill gesture to Sharad Pawar

Ajit Pawar wanted to reunite the two NCP factions as a birthday gesture for Sharad Pawar, but the plan did not take shape, NCP (SP) leader Ankush Kakade revealed.

Published

on

Sharad pawar ajit pawar

Ajit Pawar had attempted to bring together the two factions of the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) last month as a goodwill gesture to his uncle Sharad Pawar on his birthday, but the effort did not succeed, according to NCP (SP) leader Ankush Kakade.

Speaking while paying tribute to the late Maharashtra deputy chief minister, Kakade said Pawar had personally asked him and other senior leaders to help initiate reconciliation talks between the divided factions of the party.

Efforts to reunite NCP before December 12

Kakade said Ajit Pawar had reached out to leaders including Vitthal Sheth Maniar and Srinivas Patil, citing their close association with Sharad Pawar, and urged them to act as intermediaries.

Recalling the conversation, Kakade said Ajit Pawar had expressed his wish for both factions to come together on December 12, Sharad Pawar’s birthday. Although the plan did not materialise at the time, Pawar had indicated that the process could be revisited after elections.

However, the reunion effort remained incomplete, Kakade noted, adding that Pawar was keen on preserving and strengthening the political legacy built by Sharad Pawar.

Ajit Pawar remembered for handling party legacy

Reflecting on his political journey with Ajit Pawar, Kakade said he would always remember how the leader managed internal challenges while remaining mindful of the senior Pawar’s stature within the party.

Ajit Pawar died on Wednesday along with four others when their aircraft crashed near the tabletop runway at Baramati airport in Pune district. Officials said the aircraft caught fire during a second landing attempt amid poor visibility.

Those who lost their lives in the crash included two pilots, Pawar’s personal security officer and a flight attendant.

Leadership questions emerge after Pawar’s death

Following his death, attention has shifted to the future leadership of the NCP. Party voices are calling for Ajit Pawar’s wife, Sunetra Pawar, currently a Rajya Sabha MP, to take charge as party president and legislative leader.

Sources indicated that if this option faces political or procedural hurdles, senior leader Praful Patel may be considered for the role.

Continue Reading

India News

Delhi SWAT commando killed by husband, brother hears chilling final call

A Delhi Police SWAT commando was allegedly beaten to death by her husband while pregnant, with her brother hearing her final moments during a chilling phone call.

Published

on

swat commando

A 27-year-old Delhi Police Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) commando was allegedly beaten to death by her husband at their West Delhi residence, with her brother hearing her final moments during a phone call that has since become a key part of the investigation.

The victim, Kajal Chaudhary, was four months pregnant when she was assaulted on the night of January 22 at the couple’s rented home in Mohan Garden Extension. Police have arrested her husband, Ankur, a clerk posted with the Ministry of Defence at Delhi Cantonment, and registered a case of murder.

Brother hears assault during call

Kajal’s brother, Nikhil, a constable posted at Parliament Street Police Station, said he received a call from Ankur that night asking him to “make his sister understand”. When Nikhil spoke to Kajal separately, she began sharing details of ongoing issues at home.

During the conversation, Ankur allegedly snatched the phone from her and asked Nikhil to keep the call on recording, claiming it would serve as police evidence. Nikhil said he then heard his sister screaming before the call abruptly disconnected.

Minutes later, Ankur allegedly called again and informed him that Kajal had died, asking the family to come to the hospital.

Assault led to death days later

According to the FIR, Kajal was struck on the head from behind with a heavy dumbbell between 10 pm and 10.30 pm. Her family has alleged that she suffered multiple injuries across her body.

She was taken to a hospital in Ghaziabad, where she remained under treatment before succumbing to her injuries on January 27. Police arrested Ankur within hours of her death.

Dowry harassment allegations

Kajal’s family has accused her in-laws of persistent dowry harassment. Her parents claimed they had given expensive gifts, including a motorcycle, gold jewellery and cash at the time of marriage, but the demands allegedly continued.

Her mother alleged that Kajal had taken a loan for her in-laws, while her father said the family was pressured even after a car was arranged later. The family also claimed that communication with Kajal had become restricted.

Past violence and domestic workload

Nikhil said his sister had been slapped by her husband about five months ago, following which he had asked her to return home. He alleged that Ankur had apologised at the time and promised not to repeat the violence.

Despite being pregnant and working in a demanding police role, Kajal was allegedly expected to handle household chores, including cooking and cleaning, after returning from duty.

Marriage and family

Kajal and Ankur met while studying in college in Panipat and got married in November 2023. After repeated disputes at their native home in Ganaur, Haryana, they shifted to a rented house in West Delhi in December 2024, but tensions reportedly continued.

The couple has a one-and-a-half-year-old son, who is now with Kajal’s parents.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com