English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

US Asks Pakistan to End Terror Havens on Its Soil To Gain Benefits From India

Published

on

US Asks Pakistan to End Terror Havens on Its Soil To Gain Benefits From India

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]India calls Pak remarks “a lonely voice from the wilderness”

US believes that Pakistan can have strong economic benefits from India if it carries out its international responsibilities and brings an end to any kind of terror havens on its soil. This was told by Defense Secretary Jim Mattis to the members of the Senate Armed Services Committee in Washington on Tuesday.

His comments came at a time when Pakistani Foreign Minister Khwaja Asif is visiting US for meeting Secretary of state Rex Tillerson to resume bilateral talks and find out ways to dispel tension caused after President Trump’s south Asia policy speech on august 21.

According to reports from Washington, Jim Mattis further said, “There’s a great deal that Pakistan can benefit economically, diplomatically, financially for its government; economically for its people; by finally sensing that the tide has shifted against this.”

Responding to a question on why the administration believes that Pakistan will change its behavior this time, Mattis said that Trump administration believes that it would be highly difficult to sustain any stabilization in south Asia, not just in Afghanistan but certainly anywhere around Pakistan and India unless safe heavens are removed.

US President, while unveiling his Afghan policy on August 21 said, “We can no longer be silent about Pakistan’s safe havens for terrorist organizations, the Taliban, and other groups that pose a threat to the region and beyond.”

Mattis said that Pakistan has a “convoluted history” with terrorism. There can be little doubt that there have been terrorist groups that have used Pakistan as a haven for attacks outwardly.

He shared India’s concern over the Pakistan’s involvement in cross border terror activities saying, “We’ve seen the attacks on India as well. At the same time, probably few nations, perhaps none, have lost as many troops fighting terrorists as they have.”

However, John Mc Cain, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee has reportedly said, “But we still do not know what specific steps the United States will take to convince or compel Pakistan to change its behaviour, or what costs we will impose if Pakistan fails to do so.”

However, Dawn, a leading Pakistani daily published a Reuters report that Defence Secretary James Mattis has said  that Washington would try “one more time” to work with Islamabad on Afghanistan front before President Donald Trump turned to options to address Pakistan’s alleged support for militant groups.

It is believed that Trump administration was discussing the options of expanding US drone strikes and eventually downgrading Pakistan’s status of a major non-Nato ally.

Recently Marine Corps General Joseph Dunford, chairman of Joint chiefs of Staff told the Senate Armed Services Committee on Tuesday that the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) directorate had maintained relations with “terrorist groups.”

Meanwhile, Eenam Gambhir, the first secretary at India’s UN mission has, on Tuesday, dismissed Pakistan’s latest provocation at the General Assembly by raising surgical strikes and Kashmir as a waste of time “symbolic of what holds us all back”.

The Indian diplomat, using her right to reply said that Pakistan permanent representative Maleeha Lodhi’s remarks about India were “a lonely voice from the wilderness”.

“My delegation does not wish to waste the precious time of this august assembly in further engaging with such distractions,” Gambhir said in a short 45-second rejoinder. However, she was entitled to 10 minutes to exercise her right.

Earlier Maleeha Lodhi, while participating in a debate in the General Assembly on the annual report on UN’s work, went off the topic and denied that India carried out any surgical strike against Pakistan.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Latest world news

Israel-Lebanon ceasefire to begin within hours as Trump announces 10-day truce

Israel and Lebanon may begin a 10-day ceasefire within hours after a proposal announced by Donald Trump amid ongoing tensions.

Published

on

Donald Trump

A temporary halt in hostilities between Israel and Lebanon is expected to begin within hours after US President Donald Trump announced a proposed 10-day ceasefire between the two sides, amid ongoing tensions in the region.

According to his statement, the ceasefire is likely to take effect around 5 p.m. Eastern Time, although independent confirmation from both sides is still awaited.

The development follows discussions involving Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, with mediation efforts led by the United States.

Officials indicated that the proposed truce is aimed at creating a limited window to reduce violence and potentially pave the way for broader diplomatic engagement. The situation along the Israel-Lebanon border has remained tense in recent weeks, with escalation linked to the activities of Hezbollah.

Diplomatic efforts have intensified in recent days, with discussions facilitated by the United States, including the involvement of US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. However, details of the agreement and the extent of coordination between the parties remain unclear.

The situation remains fluid, and the success of the ceasefire will depend on adherence by all sides involved. The conflict has already led to significant humanitarian and geopolitical consequences, including displacement and disruption in affected areas.

While the proposed ceasefire is being seen as an important step toward de-escalation, broader negotiations involving regional stakeholders are expected to be necessary for any lasting resolution.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

US ends oil sanctions waiver for Iran and Russia, impact likely on India’s energy imports

The US decision to end the Iran and Russia oil waiver may impact India’s oil imports, fuel prices and global energy markets.

Published

on

US oil tanker

The United States has decided not to extend a temporary sanctions waiver that allowed limited trade in Iranian and Russian oil, marking a shift towards stricter enforcement of economic restrictions.

The waiver, introduced in March 2026, had permitted the sale of oil already loaded on ships to stabilise global supply during heightened geopolitical tensions. However, it is now set to expire around mid-April without renewal.

US officials have indicated that the move is part of a broader strategy to increase pressure on both Iran and Russia amid ongoing conflicts and geopolitical tensions.

What the waiver did and why it mattered

The short-term waiver allowed millions of barrels of oil—estimated at around 140 million barrels—to enter global markets, helping ease supply shortages and prevent sharp price spikes.

It also enabled countries like India to purchase discounted crude oil from Russia and resume limited imports from Iran after years of restrictions.

Impact on India

India, one of the world’s largest oil importers, is expected to feel the impact of the decision in several ways:

  • Reduced access to discounted oil
    India had been buying cheaper Russian crude and recently resumed Iranian imports under the waiver. Its end may limit these options.
  • Potential rise in fuel costs
    With fewer discounted supplies available, India may need to rely more on costlier sources, which could increase domestic fuel prices.
  • Supply diversification pressure
    India may need to explore alternative suppliers in the Middle East, Africa, or the US to maintain energy security.
  • Geopolitical balancing challenge
    The move adds pressure on India to align with US sanctions while managing its own economic interests.

Global energy market concerns

The end of the waiver comes at a time when global oil markets are already under stress due to conflict in West Asia and disruptions in key routes like the Strait of Hormuz.

Analysts warn that tightening sanctions could:

  • Reduce global oil supply
  • Increase price volatility
  • Intensify competition among major buyers like India and China

Bigger picture

The US decision reflects a broader shift from temporary relief measures to stricter enforcement of sanctions, even if it risks tightening global energy markets.

For India, the development highlights a recurring challenge—balancing affordable energy access with geopolitical realities.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Sanctioned tanker fails to breach US blockade, turns back near Strait of Hormuz

A US-sanctioned tanker failed to cross the Hormuz blockade and turned back, underscoring rising tensions and disruption in global shipping routes.

Published

on

A US-sanctioned oil tanker failed to break through a newly imposed American naval blockade and was forced to turn back near the Strait of Hormuz, highlighting growing tensions in the region.

The vessel, identified as the Rich Starry, reversed its course after attempting to exit the Gulf, according to shipping data. The development comes just days after the United States enforced restrictions on ships linked to Iranian ports.

The blockade was announced by Donald Trump following the collapse of recent diplomatic talks with Iran. The move aims to restrict maritime traffic associated with Iranian trade.

Officials said that during the first 24 hours of enforcement, no vessel successfully crossed the blockade. Several ships, including the sanctioned tanker, complied with instructions from US forces and turned back toward regional waters.

The tanker is reported to be linked to a Chinese company previously sanctioned for dealing with Iran. It was carrying a cargo of methanol loaded from the United Arab Emirates at the time of the incident.

The situation underscores the rising risks in one of the world’s most critical oil transit routes. The Strait of Hormuz typically handles a significant share of global energy shipments, but traffic has sharply declined due to ongoing geopolitical tensions.

The blockade, which applies specifically to vessels travelling to or from Iranian ports, has added further uncertainty for shipping companies, insurers and global energy markets.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com