English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Britain’s threat level raised to ‘critical’ as IS claims responsibility for Tube explosion

Published

on

Britain’s threat level raised to ‘critical’ as IS claims responsibility for Tube explosion

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]No suspects identified yet for Friday’s incident that left 29 commuters injured, British PM May hints at tough measures to ensure safety of the country

As of Saturday morning, the London Metropolitan police and Scotland Yard were still trying to identify suspects for the London Tube explosion that left 29 commuters injured at Parsons Green station on Friday, even as the Islamic State reportedly claimed responsibility for the strike.

British Prime Minister Theresa May has announced that the national threat perception level has been escalated “from severe to critical” indicating that the country’s security agencies fear the possibility of another imminent attack. May has also hinted that Londoners will have to get used to seeing a posse of armed security personnel on the streets of the British capital and that she was even willing to change human rights laws of the country if they “get in the way” of protecting Britain.

The London police are currently scouring through CCTV footage of the London Tube in which the crude, apparently homemade improvised explosive device (IED) set in a white bucket went off on Friday and also footage collected from various stations on the Tube’s route.

It has not yet been ascertained whether the IS – which has on its propaganda website Amaq News claimed responsibility for the act of terror – was actually involved in the strike. The London Metropolitan Police’s Assistant Commissioner, Mark Rowley reportedly told media outfits in London that it was “very routine” for IS to claim the attack “whether or not they’ve had any previous engagement with the individuals involved.”

It is also possible that the police are looking for more than one attacker as their statements following the explosion have mentioned that they were hunting for “suspects”.

Britain’s threat level raised to ‘critical’ as IS claims responsibility for Tube explosionThe explosion on London’s Tube is bound to rekindle pointed debate about whether countries like Britain have been tough enough in fighting terrorism. The attack had triggered a sort of verbal duel between US President Donald Trump and British PM May who was also supported by other representatives of Britain’s political and security establishment.

Trump’s suggestion that the United Kingdom needed to be “more proactive” in dealing with the terrorists and his calling the strike the handiwork of a “loser terrorist” even before Britain had declared the explosion an act of terror, too did not go down well with the British government.

Although May had – hours after Trump’s ‘loser terrorist tweet’ – confirmed that the explosion was a “cowardly act of terror”, she also rebuked the US president for his remarks, albeit without expressly naming him. “I never think it’s helpful for anybody to speculate on what is an ongoing investigation,” May had said, adding: “the police and security establishment are still working to understand the full scale of this cowardly attack and identify all those responsible for it.”

Nick Timothy, a newspaper columnist who was formerly chief of staff to Theresa May, had also responded to Trump’s tweets by terming his reaction as “unhelpful”.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]While May and others in her establishment retorted to Trump’s unsolicited advice asking the UK to be more “proactive” by terming it “unhelpful” at a time of crisis, the British Prime Minister soon after announced a slew of new measures that will be rolled out to ensure safety of Londoners.

“The public will see more armed police on the transport network and on our streets, providing extra protection. This is a proportionate and sensible step which will provide extra reassurance and protection while the investigation progresses,” May said late Friday.

The British PM also announced that for the period when the threat level remains pegged at critical “military personnel will replace police personnel on guard duties on search and protected sites that are not accessible for the public… terrorism is a great challenge of our times but by standing together we will defeat it.”[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Latest world news

Salwan Momika, who burnt Quran in 2023, shot dead in Sweden

The controversy surrounding Momika extended beyond the immediate reactions to his acts. His actions sparked a broader debate regarding freedom of speech, religious tolerance, and the potential for such acts to incite hatred and violence.

Published

on

Salwan Momika, a 38-year-old Iraqi immigrant residing in Sweden, became a controversial figure in 2023 due to his repeated public burning of the Quran. These actions, filmed and widely circulated online, ignited fierce condemnation and protests across the Muslim world. He has been shot dead in Sweden, according to reports.

The desecration of Islam’s holy book prompted outrage and unrest in numerous countries, with demonstrations ranging from peaceful protests to violent riots. Governments and religious leaders issued strong statements of disapproval, highlighting the deeply offensive nature of Momika’s actions to billions of Muslims globally.

The controversy surrounding Momika extended beyond the immediate reactions to his acts. His actions sparked a broader debate regarding freedom of speech, religious tolerance, and the potential for such acts to incite hatred and violence.

While Sweden, like many Western democracies, upholds freedom of expression as a fundamental right, the line between this right and the potential for incitement to hatred and violence remains a complex and contentious issue. Critics argued that Momika’s actions crossed this line, deliberately provoking religious sensibilities and contributing to a climate of hostility. Conversely, proponents of his right to protest emphasized the importance of protecting free speech, even when the content is deeply offensive to others.

At the time of his death, Momika was awaiting a court ruling on charges of inciting ethnic hatred. This legal case further highlighted the complex legal and ethical ramifications of his actions. The Swedish judicial system was tasked with navigating the delicate balance between safeguarding free speech and preventing incitement to violence.

The outcome of the trial, which was ultimately postponed following his death, would have had significant implications for the interpretation and application of hate speech laws in Sweden and potentially beyond.

The shooting death of Salwan Momika adds another layer to this already complex and controversial situation. While the circumstances surrounding his death remain under investigation, it is undeniably a significant event with potential ramifications for the ongoing debate surrounding freedom of speech, religious sensitivities, and the prevention of religiously motivated violence.

The incident highlights the volatile nature of the issues at stake and the ongoing challenges in balancing individual rights with the need for social harmony and respect for different religious beliefs.

Continue Reading

India News

ChatGPT outage affects thousands of users globally, OpenAI reacts

OpenAI swiftly acknowledged the outage, publishing updates on their dedicated status page. This transparency, while offering little in the way of immediate solutions, served to reassure users that the company was actively addressing the situation.

Published

on

On January 23, OpenAI’s popular AI chatbot, ChatGPT, suffered a significant global outage, leaving millions of users unable to access the service. The disruption affected multiple access points, including the web interface, the mobile application, and even integrations on social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter). This widespread failure quickly drew significant attention, with reports flooding in from users worldwide.

The outage tracking website, Downdetector, registered a surge in user reports, exceeding a thousand complaints within a short period. This volume underscored the scale of the disruption and the significant impact on ChatGPT’s user base.

The majority of these reports indicated a complete inability to use the chatbot, highlighting the severity of the problem. A smaller percentage of users reported encountering difficulties with the website or API, suggesting a less comprehensive but still noticeable impact.

OpenAI swiftly acknowledged the outage, publishing updates on their dedicated status page. This transparency, while offering little in the way of immediate solutions, served to reassure users that the company was actively addressing the situation.

The official statements consistently described the problem as “degraded performance” and “elevated error rates” within the API, hinting at underlying technical issues that required investigation. However, specific details regarding the root cause remained undisclosed, pending a more thorough examination.

According to reports, the outage commenced around 5 PM IST and persisted for several hours. The lack of a definitive timeline and the ongoing nature of the disruption underlined the complexity of the problem and the challenges faced by OpenAI’s engineering teams in resolving the issue.

As of the latest updates, the exact cause of the outage remains under investigation by OpenAI. The company is actively working to restore full functionality and provide a more comprehensive explanation once the underlying problem has been identified and rectified.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Prince Harry, Rupert Murdoch’s UK group reach settlement in surveillance case

The relentless media attention, he has claimed, also contributed to the intense pressure that led him and his wife, Meghan Markle, to step back from royal duties and relocate to the United States in 2020.

Published

on

Prince Harry has reached a settlement with Rupert Murdoch’s News Group Newspapers (NGN), bringing an abrupt end to a high-profile lawsuit alleging widespread phone hacking and unlawful surveillance.

The settlement, announced just as the trial was about to commence, includes substantial financial compensation for the Duke of Sussex and a formal, unequivocal apology from NGN. This marks a significant victory for Harry, who had accused the media giant of years of intrusive and illegal activities targeting his private life.

The apology, issued directly to Harry’s legal team, explicitly acknowledged the serious breach of privacy inflicted by both The Sun and the defunct News of the World. It detailed unlawful actions perpetrated between 1996 and 2011, including phone hacking, surveillance, and the use of private investigators to obtain sensitive information.

The statement specifically addressed the intrusive activities carried out by private investigators employed by The Sun, emphasizing the severity of the intrusion into Harry’s private life during his formative years. The apology extended to the distress caused to his late mother, Princess Diana, highlighting the impact of the media’s actions on the young prince.

This settlement represents one of three lawsuits filed by Harry against British media outlets, all stemming from accusations of privacy violations. He has consistently blamed the media for the relentless pursuit of his mother, Princess Diana, ultimately leading to her tragic death in a car crash in Paris while being chased by paparazzi.

The relentless media attention, he has claimed, also contributed to the intense pressure that led him and his wife, Meghan Markle, to step back from royal duties and relocate to the United States in 2020.

The case underscores the wider issue of phone hacking and media intrusion, exemplified by the notorious scandal that forced the closure of News of the World in 2011. The hacking of murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler’s phone, during the police investigation into her disappearance, remains a particularly egregious example of the unethical practices employed by some sections of the British press.

Harry’s legal battle has brought renewed focus to this issue and the need for greater accountability within the media industry. The settlement, while ending this particular legal chapter, leaves a lasting legacy concerning media responsibility and the rights of public figures to privacy.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com