English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Trump to order Embassy shift to Jerusalem despite world community warning

Published

on

Trump to order Embassy shift to Jerusalem despite world community warning

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Most of friends and foes oppose the move

US President Donald Trump is creating history on Wednesday when he formally recognises Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and direct Department of State to begin process to move its embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Announcement is expected at 1800 hrs GMT (23.30 IST).

Trump’s move comes at a time when world community, all regional countries, friends and foes have warned White House that it will undermine regional stability and affect the already tattered peace process.

Reports, quoting a senior administration official, from Washington, say that President will sign a waiver delaying the embassy move for another six months to comply with the law. The process is expected to take years before the embassy will really be shifted to the new address. Earlier he has signed similar waiver for once.

The US officials call the move “recognition of reality” as Jerusalem has been the seat of Israeli government. They have justified the move saying that the decision would have no impact on the boundaries of the future Israeli and Palestinian states as negotiated under a final status agreement.

According to CNN, the senior official who briefed the media persons on Tuesday, has rejected suggestions that the move would hurt the peace process. But he could not either offer any argument that it would help the peace process. He chose to counter the questioner saying that keeping US embassy in Tel Aviv, despite legislation calling for a move to Jerusalem, had not advanced peace process in more than two decades either.

“It seems clear now that the physical location of the American embassy is not material to a peace deal. It’s not an impediment to peace and it’s not a facilitator to peace,” the administration official said. “After having tried this for 22 years, an acknowledgment of reality seems like an important thing,” he added.

The decision to move US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem by Trump administration is not only opposed by its traditional opponents in the region but their closest allies.

Spokesman for Antonio Guterres, the UN Secretary-General told reporters in New York that he has “consistently warned against any unilateral action that would have the potential to undermine the two-state solution”.

The European allies, who are closer to the Israel-Palestine theatre have expressed equal concern about the US move.

EU top diplomat Federica Mogherini, who recently took clear stand against Trump’s decision to withdraw from Iranian nuclear deal, said “any action that would undermine” peace efforts to create two separate states for the Israelis and the Palestinians “must absolutely be avoided.”

German foreign minister Sigmar Gabriel also warned that recognition of Jerusalem by US “as the capital of Israel does not calm a conflict, rather it fuels it even more,” and such a move “would be a very dangerous development.”

Meanwhile President Donald Trump called Palestinian President Mehmoud Abbas and other Arab leaders to inform about his intended announcement. The US president was warned by the regional leaders about the “dangerous consequences” it would have on the regional stability.

According to Nabil Abu Rudeina, the spokesman for head of the Palestinian Authority, “President Abbas warned of the dangerous consequences such a decision would have to the peace process and to the peace, security and stability of the region and of the world”.

Jordanian President’s palace statement says that King Abdullah II has told Trump that the move would have “dangerous repercussions on the stability and security of the region”. It further said, “Jerusalem is the key to achieving peace and stability in the region and the world”.

He also warned about the risks of any decision that amounts to be against final settlement of the Arab-Israeli conflict based on the creation of independent Palestinian state with its capital in East Jerusalem.

A statement issued by Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi has also cautioned US administration against “taking measures that would undermine the chances of peace in the Middle East”. He affirmed Egyptian position on preserving the legal status of Jerusalem with the framework of international references and relevant UN resolutions.

Saudi Arabia’s King Salman, who hosted Trump for his maiden overseas visit facilitating his meeting with more than 50 heads of states earlier this year, has told US, that “any American announcement regarding the situation of Jerusalem prior to reaching a permanent settlement will harm peace talks and increase tensions in the area”.

King Salman has reportedly further said, “Such a dangerous step is likely to inflame the passions of Muslims around the world due to the great status of Jerusalem and the al-Aqsa mosque”.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, reacted to proposed US move by threatening to severe diplomatic ties with Israel. He said, “Jerusalem is a red line for Muslims. We implore the US once again: You cannot take this step.”

Palestinian Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh said that the decision by the Trump administration will “[ignite] the spark of rage against the occupation”, and that relocating the US Embassy to Jerusalem “breaks red lines”.

Haniyeh called Palestinian Authority President Mehmoud Abbas and both leaders agreed to hold a mass protest on Wednesday in the occupied territories against the US move. It is the rare occasion when Mehmoud Abbas, who is considered to be a US ally by most observers has joined hands with Hamas for the anti-US protest.

Arab League chief Ahmed Aboul-Gheit has also warned the US not to take any measures that would affect Jerusalem’s current legal status. While speaking at a meeting in Cairo he said US decision is a “dangerous measure that would have repercussions” across the entire region.

Currently there is no foreign embassy in Jerusalem. World community does not recognise Israel’s jurisdiction over land and ownership of the city.

Meanwhile, Tehran based Press TV commented on the Saudi Arabia’s reaction to US move saying, “In an attempt to portray itself as a defender of the Palestinian cause, Saudi Arabia has joined a chorus of condemnation of a contentious plan by US President Donald Trump to relocate Washington’s embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem al-Quds.”

It reminded recent disclosure by Lebanese al-Akhbar newspaper about a secret letter from Saudi foreign minister Adel al-Jubeir to Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman putting forward “a plan to normalize ties with Israel despite “risks” of a public backlash.

There are no diplomatic ties between Saudi Arabia and Israel. Some reports were published in Middle East that Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman has secretly visited Israel in recent months.

It has been difficult for Saudi rulers to balance between their projected image of being “the custodian of two grand mosques” and having ties with Israel. However, recently Israeli officials have declared about their relations with several Arab countries including Saudi Arabia. Egypt, Jordan and Turkey maintain diplomatic ties with Israel.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Latest world news

Trump says Iran getting more serious in talks, no decision yet on major strikes

Donald Trump says Iran is becoming more serious in negotiations with the US but insists no decision has been taken on launching major military strikes against Tehran.

Published

on

Donald Trump

US President Donald Trump has said he has not yet decided whether to authorise major military strikes against Iran, stating that Tehran has become “more serious” in its negotiations with Washington even as tensions between the two countries remain high.

Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office on Friday, Trump said discussions with Iran were continuing and suggested diplomatic efforts were showing signs of progress.

“We’re talking to them right now. I think they’re getting more and more serious as the days go by,” Trump said, adding that no final decision had been taken on launching military action.

Trump says diplomacy remains an option

Trump said the United States remained prepared for military action if required but indicated that ongoing talks could still lead to an agreement.

“We’re locked and loaded and ready to go. But we’re talking to them, so I think while we’re talking, we’ll see what comes of it. I believe they’re very serious. They should be,” he said.

The US President also warned that Iran would face a “much higher level” of strikes if negotiations failed, while reiterating that preventing Tehran from developing a nuclear weapon remained his key red line.

The United States has said its military operations are aimed at preventing Iran from closing the strategically important Strait of Hormuz. Iran, meanwhile, has carried out retaliatory strikes on US bases, with four American service members reported killed.

Reports claim Trump discussed large-scale military operation

Trump’s remarks came after media reports suggested he met senior advisers to discuss the possibility of a large-scale military operation against Iran. Another report said he was considering a “massive attack”, although Trump did not confirm those reports during his interaction with journalists.

He also acknowledged that the prolonged conflict, which he had earlier expected to last only a few weeks, was approaching its fifth month and had become a political challenge ahead of the US midterm elections scheduled for November.

Trump issues warning over support for Iran

Trump also addressed reports claiming that Russia and China were providing intelligence or military support to Iran. He said both Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin had assured him they would not arm Tehran.

“I think they wouldn’t want to have me disappointed,” Trump said.

In a separate post on his Truth Social platform, Trump warned Moscow and Beijing against supplying weapons to Iran, saying such a move would not be in their interests.

He further stated that Xi had assured him during their meeting in Beijing in May that China would not provide weapons to Iran, while Putin had conveyed a similar position despite the ongoing war in Ukraine.

Continue Reading

India News

For second time, US strikes ship with Indian crew near Strait of Hormuz

Published

on

By

Strait of Hormuz

The United States Central Command (CENTCOM) has said that an oil tanker carrying Indian crew was drifting with its engine switched off near the Strait of Hormuz before it was struck by US forces.

A CENTCOM spokesperson said the vessel had stopped due to engine failure and was drifting after its crew repeatedly sought additional time to carry out repairs. US officials said the tanker was struck only after it failed to comply with directives issued by US forces enforcing a blockade on vessels allegedly transporting Iranian oil. The military said the strike was aimed at disabling the ship by targeting its engine room rather than sinking it.

The incident involved a tanker carrying Indian seafarers near the Gulf of Oman, close to the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s busiest maritime trade routes. The strike triggered a fire onboard, prompting rescue efforts by Omani authorities and maritime agencies. Indian authorities closely monitored the situation and coordinated with local officials regarding the welfare of the crew members.

The incident has drawn concern in India, with the government emphasising the safety of Indian nationals working aboard commercial vessels in the conflict-hit region. The Ministry of External Affairs has remained in touch with the authorities concerned as tensions between the United States and Iran continue to pose risks to international shipping.

In June, three Indian sailors were killed in a US strike on another oil tanker. The Strait of Hormuz handles a significant share of the word’s oil trade, and the latest incident has renewed concerns over the security of merchant vessels operating in the region. Maritime experts have warned that escalating hostilities could further disrupt commercial shipping and endanger civilian crews navigating one of the world’s most strategically important waterways.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump announces phased tariff of up to 200% on generic drug imports, India may face impact

US President Donald Trump has announced a phased tariff plan on imported generic medicines, raising duties to 200% after three years, a move that could affect India’s pharmaceutical exports.

Published

on

Donald Trump

The United States has announced a phased tariff plan for imported generic medicines that could have implications for pharmaceutical exporters, including India. US President Donald Trump said the policy is intended to encourage companies to shift generic drug manufacturing to the United States by imposing steep tariffs after a two-year transition period.

The announcement is particularly important for India, one of the world’s largest suppliers of affordable generic medicines and a major exporter to the US market.

Trump outlines phased tariff plan

In a post on his Truth Social platform, President Trump said the new policy will take effect from August 1, 2026. Under the plan, imported generic medicines will continue to attract zero tariffs for the first two years.

Beginning in the third year, the tariff will increase to 100%, before rising further to 200% thereafter.

Trump said the measure is designed to encourage pharmaceutical companies to establish manufacturing facilities in the United States instead of relying on imports.

He added that companies choosing not to invest in US-based production during the transition period would face the higher tariff rates. According to Trump, the existing policy governing patented, branded and innovative medicines will remain unchanged.

Why India could be affected

India is widely regarded as the “pharmacy of the world” because of its large-scale production and export of generic medicines.

Indian generic drugs account for nearly 40% of the US generic medicine market by volume. According to a Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) report, India exported pharmaceutical products worth USD 9.7 billion to the United States during the 2024-25 financial year, representing around 38% of the country’s total pharmaceutical exports of USD 25.8 billion.

However, the immediate impact of the newly announced tariff policy on Indian pharmaceutical companies remains uncertain.

Existing trade agreement and industry concerns

India and the United States struck a trade pact in February that states India would receive negotiated outcomes regarding generic pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical ingredients.

Despite that provision, previous tariff threats by Trump had already raised concerns within the pharmaceutical industry over the future of affordable medicine exports from India.

Indian pharmaceutical companies supply a wide range of generic medicines used to treat conditions including hypertension, diabetes, depression, cancer, infectious diseases and mental health disorders.

According to a Financial Post report cited in the source material, around 65% of birth control pill prescriptions in the United States during 2024 were manufactured by two India-based companies — Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Lupin Ltd.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com