English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Rafale deal: French Govt, Dassault refute ex French Prez Hollande’s reported statement, he stands by it

Published

on

Rafale deal

The bombshell of former French President Francois Hollande’s reported statement about Indian government proposing Reliance as Dassault’s partner company for offset contract set off a spate of claims and denials.

While the French government and Dassault aviation sought to refute Hollande’s claim, the former President stood by his statement, reported NDTV.

France’s Ministry of Europe and Foreign Affairs said that the French government had no role to play in choosing partner companies in India for the purpose of offsets contracts in the Rafale deal.

The French government clarified that they were not involved in the choice of Indian partners. The French government said their role was just to ensure the delivery and quality of the aircraft. “The French government is in no manner involved in the choice of Indian industrial partners who have been, are being, or will be selected by French companies,” the French government said.

Dassault Aviation also reacted, issuing a statement to say, “This offsets contract is delivered in compliance with the Defence Procurement Procedure (DPP) 2016 regulations. In this framework, and in accordance with the policy of Make in India, Dassault Aviation has decided to make a partnership with India’s Reliance Group. This is Dassault Aviation’s choice…”

Francois Hollande’s reported statement

France’s former President Hollande had reportedly told French media that the Indian government proposed Reliance Defence as the partner for Dassault Aviation in the Rs 58,000 crore Rafale deal and France did not have a choice.

The former French President’s remarks contradict the Indian government’s claim that the deal between Dassault and Reliance was a commercial pact between two private parties and the government had nothing to do with it.

The deal for 36 Rafale aircraft in a government-to-government agreement was announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on April 10, 2015 during his visit to Paris, which led to the cancellation of the 126 aircraft deal being negotiated by the previous government. The deal was eventually signed on September 23, 2016 in Delhi between then Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar and his French counterpart.

The Congress has been accusing massive irregularities in the deal, alleging that the government was procuring each aircraft at a cost of over Rs.1,670 crore as against Rs.526 crore finalised by the UPA government when it was negotiating procurement of 126 Rafale jets.

According to Mediapart, a French language publication, Hollande said the original deal was to be 126 aircraft, “but with the change of government (in India in 2014), the Indians reformulated their proposal, which was less attractive for us, since it was 36 aircraft only. But the manufacture was planned in France, contrary to the previous proposal. So we lost on one side, but we won the other.”

Opposition parties, including the Congress, have also alleged that undue favours had been granted to Ambani’s firm in this deal, a company without any defence manufacturing experience.

The report in ‘Mediapart’ quoted Hollande as saying, “It was the Indian government that proposed this service group, and Dassault which negotiated with Ambani. We had no choice, we took the interlocutor who was given to us.”

Asked who selected Reliance as a partner and why, Hollande replied, “We had no say in this regard.” Dassault Aviation, the makers of Rafale, had chosen Reliance Defence as its partner to fulfill offset obligations of the deal.

Offset clause and Reliance

Under the offsets clause, France is to invest 50 per cent of the total order cost in local contracts in India, worth Rs 30,000 crore, as per an Indian Express report. The offset obligations of the deal are to be discharged from September 2019 to September 2023, as per the contract.

The Rafale offset was the first project of this magnitude won by Reliance Defence, which placed it at the centre of a major political row. The government has been maintaining it did not have any role in selection of the offset partner by Dassault.

In a statement, the Ministry of Defence had stated on February 7 that “no Indian Offset Partner for the 2016 deal for 36 Rafale Aircraft has been so far selected by the vendor (DA) because as per the applicable guidelines, DA is free to select the Indian Offset Partners and provide their details at the time of seeking offset credits, or one year prior to discharge of offset obligation.”

The opposition parties have also alleged that the Reliance Defence was formed just 12 days before the announcement of the Rafale deal by the prime minister on 10 April 2015. The Reliance group has rejected the charges.

Former HAL chief’s statement

In an oblique justification of the government not pressing for the offset contract being given to state-owned Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), Defence minister Nirmala Sitharaman had also raised questions about the public sector company to produce Rafale fighter jets. Howvere, T Suvarna Raju, who was heading HAL till three weeks ago, told HT on September 19 that the public sector undertaking could have built Rafale fighters in India had the government managed to close the original negotiations with French aerospace firm Dassault Aviation for 126 fighters and that there was a work-share agreement between the two companies. However, he admitted that it would have cost HAL more to make the aircraft. Former air chief AY Tipnis told HT that HAL may have found it challenging to build the Rafale.

Now, as allegations flew thick and fast after Hollande’s statement, a defence ministry spokesperson tweeted that the report “is being verified” and that “neither GoI (government of India) nor the French Government had any say in the commercial decision.”

Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, who was in Cairo when Hollande’s bombshell came, called off  her visit to France for a meeting with her counterpart there this week, reported The Indian Express.

French government’s statement

As Hollande’s statement set off an intense verbal war in India, the French government came out with a statement refuting the former President.

“The intergovernmental agreement signed on 23rd September 2016 between the French and Indian governments for supplying India with 36 Rafale aircraft concerns the obligations of the French government solely with regard to ensuring the delivery and quality of this equipment,” it said.

Further stating that the French government is in no manner involved in the choice of Indian industrial partners who have been, are being, or will be selected by French companies, France said, “In accordance with India’s acquisition procedure, French companies have the full freedom to choose the Indian partner companies that they consider to be the most relevant, then present for the Indian government’s approval the offsets projects that they wish to execute in India with these local partners so as to fulfil their obligations in this regard.”

“As it happens, agreements have already been signed by French companies with many Indian firms, both public and private, under the framework of Indian laws.”

Dassault Aviation

In a statement, Dassault Aviation said it has decided to make a partnership with the Reliance Defence in accordance with the policy of ‘Make in India’.

Providing clarifications regarding the contract, Dassault Aviation said, “This contract is a government-to-government agreement, it provides for a separate contract in which Dassault Aviation commits to make compensation investments (offsets) in India worth 50 per cent of the value of the purchase.”

It added, “This offsets contract is delivered in compliance with the Defence Procurement Procedure (DPP) 2016 regulations. In this framework, and in accordance with the policy of Make in India, Dassault Aviation has decided to make a partnership with India’s Reliance Group. This is Dassault Aviation’s choice as CEO Eric Trappe=ier had explained in an interview published in MINT newspaper on April 17, 2018. This partnership has led to the creation of the Dassault Reliance Aerospace Ltd (DRAL) joint venture in February 2017.Dassault Aviation and Reliance have built a plant in Nagpur for manufacturing parts for Falcon and Rafale aircraft.”

Ten days after India sealed the government-to-government agreement on the Rafale deal, Reliance Defence and Dassault had announced a joint venture (JV) in the aerospace sector and a year later, the foundation stone of a manufacturing facility was laid in Mihan, Nagpur.

Dassault Aviation provides the following clarifications regarding the contract signed in 2016 for 36 Rafale aircraft to India:

  1. This contract is a government-to-government agreement. It provides for a separate contract in which Dassault Aviation commits to make compensation investments (offsets) in India worth 50% of the value of the purchase.
  2. This offsets contract is delivered in compliance with the Defence Procurement Procedure (DPP) 2016 regulations. In this framework, and in accordance with the policy of Make in India, Dassault Aviation has decided to make a partnership with India’s Reliance Group. This is Dassault Aviation’s choice, as CEO Eric Trappier had explained in an interview published in MINT newspaper on April 17, 2018. This partnership has led to the creation of the Dassault Reliance Aerospace Ltd (DRAL) joint-venture in February 2017. Dassault Aviation and Reliance have built a plant in Nagpur for manufacturing parts for Falcon and Rafale aircraft. The Nagpur site was chosen because of the availability of land with direct access to an airport runway, an essential condition of aeronautic activities.
  3. Other partnerships have been signed with other companies such as BTSL, DEFSYS, Kinetic, Mahindra, Maini, SAMTEL,… Other negotiations are ongoing with a hundred-odd other potential partners.
  4. Dassault Aviation is very proud that the Indian authorities have selected the Rafale fighter.

India News

Under fire for donation theft, Ram temple trust calls for applications for CEO post

Published

on

By

The Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust has invited applications for the post of its first Chief Executive Officer (CEO) to strengthen the administration of the Ram Temple in Ayodhya.

The Trust has set a July 18, 4 pm deadline for applications. This is the first time the Trust is appointing a CEO to oversee the temple’s day-to-day functioning.

The decision was taken under the leadership of Trust Chairman Mahant Nritya Gopal Das. The selected CEO will work under Trust General Secretary Champat Rai and will be responsible for managing the temple’s daily operations, supervising administrative departments, coordinating with officials, ensuring smooth arrangements for devotees, and maintaining transparency in the temple’s functioning.

The Trust notification said candidates applying for the post should be between 50 and 70 years of age and must have at least three years of experience in a senior administrative or leadership position. Applicants should also be practising Hindus and devotees of Lord Ram. To ensure a fair selection process, the Trust has formed a three-member committee to examine applications and recommend suitable candidates for the final appointment.

The move comes after the Trust decided to further strengthen its administrative system as the number of visitors to the Ram Temple continues to increase. In recent months, the temple administration has also focused on improving financial monitoring and overall management, making the appointment of a professional CEO an important step.

The Ram Temple in Ayodhya has emerged as one of India’s most prominent pilgrimage destinations since its inauguration. Every day, thousands of devotees visit the temple, creating the need for a dedicated executive to manage operations efficiently and ensure better services for pilgrims.

The Trust believes that appointing its first CEO will improve coordination, accountability, and administrative efficiency while supporting the temple’s future expansion plans. After the application deadline on July 18, the selection committee will review all applications before making its recommendation. The final appointment will be made by the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust, marking a significant milestone in the professional management of the Ram Temple.

The Trust has been at the receiving end of the public backlash following the theft of money and articles donated to the temple. Investigations are underway to find the real culprits.

Continue Reading

India News

Sonam Wangchuk’s health declines during hunger strike, actor Omi Vaidya calls for more popular support

Published

on

By

Actor Omi Vaidya, best known for playing Chatur Ramalingam in 3 Idiots, has appealed to people to support climate activist Sonam Wangchuk, whose health has reportedly deteriorated during his indefinite hunger strike on the Cockroach Janta Patry dais at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi.

Sharing a video message on Instagram, Vaidya referred to Wangchuk as the “real-life Phunsukh Wangdu,” the character in 3 Idiots inspired by the Ladakh-based innovator. He urged people not to remain silent and said, “Don’t let Phunsukh Wangdu die.” Calling Wangchuk’s work an inspiration, the actor appealed for greater support as concerns over the activist’s health continue to grow.

Recent updates from Wangchuk’s supporters indicate that his health has significantly declined after fasting for over two weeks. His blood glucose level reportedly dropped to 67 mg/ dL, and he has lost over 8 kg since beginning the indefinite hunger strike. The protest is aimed at drawing attention to environmental protection and governance-related demands concerning Ladakh.

Sonam Wangchuk, an engineer, education reformer and Ramon Magsaysay Award winner, is widely recognised as the real-life inspiration behind Wangdu, the iconic character played by Aamir Khan in Rajkumar Hirani’s 2009 film 3 Idiots. Although Wangchuk has previously distanced himself from direct comparisons with the character, his work in education and sustainable development has often been linked to the film.

Vaidya’s appeal has added a film industry voice to the growing concern over Wangchuk’s health. As his hunger strike continues, supporters and public figures have called for immediate attention to his condition and renewed dialogue over the issues he has raised. The protest is underway demanding Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan resign over the NEETUG fiasco.

 

Continue Reading

India News

Ladakh may get Article 371-like safeguards, autonomous councils

Published

on

By

Laddakh Violence

The Central government is said to be working on a proposal to grant Ladakh a special governance framework similar to Article 371 of the Constitution.

The move is aimed at addressing the long-standing demands of the people of Ladakh for greater autonomy, protection of local culture, and stronger local self-governance after the region became a Union Territory in 2019.

According to the proposal, Autonomous Hill Development Councils (AHDCs) will be established in all seven districts of Ladakh. At present, only Leh and Kargil have elected hill councils. The expansion of these councils is expected to ensure balanced development, improve local administration, and give residents of every district a greater role in decision-making.

The Centre is also planning to create a Union Territory-level elected body that will coordinate the functioning of all district councils. This institution is expected to have powers related to planning, development, finance, and administration, helping improve governance across Ladakh while maintaining coordination with the Union Territory administration.

Article 371 is a special provision in the Constitution that gives some states extra rights to protect their culture, local traditions, land, and ensure better administration based on their unique needs. While Ladakh is not expected to receive Article 371 in its existing form, the government is considering a customized framework with similar constitutional protections suited to the region’s geographical and social conditions.

The proposal comes after several rounds of discussions between the Centre, the Ladakh administration, and representatives of civil society. Local groups have been demanding constitutional safeguards to protect the region’s fragile environment, tribal identity, employment opportunities, and control over land resources.

If approved, the Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council Act will be amended, followed by the delimitation of constituencies before elections are held for the newly-created councils. The proposal is currently under consideration.

The initiative is expected to strengthen grassroots democracy, promote inclusive development, and provide Ladakh with greater administrative autonomy while remaining a Union Territory.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com