English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

South Korea divided on future of US forces presence

Published

on

South Korea divided on future of US forces presence

The conflicting opinions on the future of US forces in South Korea after the probable peace agreement between North and South Korea have emerged in Seoul. President Moon Jae-in, who recently set with Kim Jong Un, the North Korean leader in a historic summit, has clarified that presence of US forces have nothing to do with the peace treaty.

According to Seoul based Korea Times, President Moon Jae-in, has warned his special advisor on security and unification Moon Chung-in over his claims that US would have to withdraw its troops from South Korea if a peace treaty was signed.

Read More: North and South come closer on Korean Peninsula

Moon Chung-in, security and reunification advisor to the President Moon Jae-in, has recently written an op-ed article published in US based Foreign Affairs, on Monday. He said,  “What will happen to U.S. forces in South Korea if a peace treaty is signed? It will be difficult to justify their continuing presence in South Korea after its adoption. But there will be a strong conservative opposition to the reduction and withdrawal of U.S. forces, posing a major political dilemma for Moon (Jae-in).”

South Korea divided on future of US forces presence

The article triggered a huge backlash from conservative politicians in Seoul who, in return, urged President Moon Jae-in to sack his advisor immediately.

An official associated with President House known as Blue House or Cheong Wa Dae, said, “We don’t want unnecessary confusion to be created.”  He indicated the need for Seoul to take a cautious stance at a critical moment when the outcome of the inter-Korean summit should lead to the successful outcome of the Trump-Kim summit for complete denuclearization of the peninsula.

Read More: US, China welcome N Korea halt on Nuclear, Missile tests

Korea Times reports that after Kim Jong-un expressed his intention to discard his nuclear weapons, conservative politicians in Seoul and some Korean affairs experts abroad voiced the opinion that the North Korean leader may want the withdrawal of the US forces in return.

The South Korean official said that Washington has not made any comment about the US Forces Korea (USFK). He added the leaders of the two Koreas also did not talk about this issue during their summit.

He further said, “We believe the USFK are needed (even after a peace treaty is signed) as a mediator in the military configuration of regional powers including China and Japan.”  The official said that President’s office is not considering stripping Moon Chung-in of his special advisor status.

Korea Times reports that his is not the first time the presidential office has given warning to Moon Chung-in, Presidential advisor on security and reunification, for expressing his opinion different from the Moon Jae-in government.

Prior to the summit between US President Donald Trump and South Korean President Moon Jae-in, Moon Chung-in, while speaking in a seminar in Washington said  that the joint military drills may be scaled down and the frequency of the dispatch of US strategic assets to the peninsula may be reduced if North Korea stops its nuclear and missile programs.

Moon Chang-in was told to refrain from making such comments, which it viewed would not help improve Seoul-Washington relations.

Latest world news

Trump approves nearly $9 billion weapons sales to Israel, UAE and other allies amid Iran tensions

The US has fast-tracked nearly $9 billion in weapons sales to Israel, UAE and other allies as tensions linked to the Iran conflict continue despite a fragile ceasefire.

Published

on

Donald Trump statement

The United States has approved nearly $9 billion worth of weapons sales to key Middle Eastern allies, including Israel and the United Arab Emirates, amid ongoing tensions linked to the Iran conflict.

The decision, cleared by the administration of Donald Trump, includes expedited military transfers to Israel, the UAE, Qatar, and Kuwait. The approvals were granted under an emergency provision, allowing authorities to bypass the usual congressional review process.

Emergency clearance amid ongoing conflict

Officials said the move was necessary due to the evolving security situation in the region, particularly as the conflict involving Iran continues despite a fragile ceasefire. The war, which began earlier in 2026, has heightened instability across West Asia.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio invoked emergency powers to fast-track the deals, citing urgent defence requirements for allied nations.

What the arms package includes

The approved package includes a mix of advanced defence systems and precision weapons:

  • Patriot missile defence replenishments worth over $4 billion for Qatar
  • Precision-guided weapon systems for multiple countries
  • Integrated battle command systems for Kuwait
  • Additional advanced weapons support for Israel and the UAE

The total value of these deals is estimated at over $8.6 billion, often rounded to nearly $9 billion.

Timing linked to iran war

The approval comes nearly nine weeks into the conflict involving the US, Israel, and Iran, with tensions still high despite a ceasefire that has been in place for several weeks.

Analysts note that the move signals continued US military backing for its regional allies, particularly in strengthening air defence and precision strike capabilities during uncertain conditions.

Criticism and concerns

The decision to bypass congressional oversight has drawn criticism from some quarters, particularly over transparency and the broader implications of increasing arms supplies in a conflict-prone region.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump and Putin hold over 90-minute call, discuss Iran war and Ukraine conflict

Trump and Putin held a 90-minute call focusing on Iran tensions and the Ukraine conflict, with warnings over escalation and talks of ceasefire.

Published

on

Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump

US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin held a phone conversation lasting more than 90 minutes, focusing on escalating tensions in the Middle East and the ongoing war in Ukraine.

According to official statements, the discussion was described as “frank and businesslike,” with both leaders addressing key global security concerns. A major part of the conversation centred on the situation involving Iran and developments in the Persian Gulf.

Putin supported Trump’s decision to extend the ceasefire related to Iran, suggesting that continued restraint could create space for negotiations and help stabilise the region. However, he also issued a strong warning, stating that renewed military action by the United States or Israel could lead to “extremely damaging consequences” not only for Iran but for the wider international community.

Ukraine conflict also discussed

The leaders also discussed the ongoing war in Ukraine, which has continued for several years since Russia’s invasion in 2022. During the call, there were indications of potential efforts toward a temporary ceasefire, although no final agreement has been confirmed.

Reports suggest that the idea of a short-term pause in hostilities was explored, possibly linked to upcoming symbolic dates, but significant differences between the parties remain unresolved.

Focus on diplomacy amid global tensions

The call highlights ongoing diplomatic engagement between Washington and Moscow at a time of heightened geopolitical tensions involving both the Middle East and Eastern Europe.

While both sides acknowledged the importance of dialogue, the situation on the ground in both conflict zones remains complex, with no immediate resolution in sight.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump rejects Iran peace plan as tensions rise, Tehran signals military readiness

Trump rejects Iran’s peace plan, keeping focus on nuclear concerns as Tehran signals readiness and tensions continue to rise.

Published

on

Donald Trump statement

U.S. President Donald Trump has rejected a proposal from Iran aimed at easing ongoing tensions, signaling a continued deadlock between the two countries.

The proposal reportedly included steps linked to easing restrictions around the Strait of Hormuz, a key global oil route. However, the United States declined the offer, maintaining that any agreement must address concerns related to Iran’s nuclear programme.

Washington has made it clear that resolving nuclear issues remains a priority and that partial measures without broader commitments will not be accepted.

Nuclear issue remains central

The U.S. position continues to focus on preventing Iran from advancing its nuclear capabilities. Officials believe that without a comprehensive agreement, temporary arrangements could delay a long-term resolution.

The rejection of the proposal indicates that negotiations remain stalled, with both sides holding firm on key demands.

Iran issues warning

Following the rejection, Iranian officials have issued strong statements, indicating readiness to respond if pressure from the U.S. continues.

Reports suggest that Iran has asserted its military preparedness, warning that any escalation could lead to serious consequences. The remarks reflect growing tensions as diplomatic efforts struggle to produce results.

Rising geopolitical tension

The situation remains volatile, with both countries engaged in a prolonged standoff. Measures such as restrictions on trade routes and strategic pressure points continue to impact the broader region.

The Strait of Hormuz remains a critical factor in the conflict, given its importance for global energy supplies.

Outlook uncertain

With no immediate breakthrough in sight, tensions between the United States and Iran are expected to persist. The lack of agreement on key issues, particularly the nuclear programme, continues to hinder progress toward de-escalation.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com