English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Will Bhutanese Low-Cost Labour Lose Thankless Jobs Under Trump’s Watch?

Published

on

Will Bhutanese Low-Cost Labour Lose Thankless Jobs Under Donald Trump’s Watch?

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Many low-wage industries depend heavily on migrants from the world’s hotspots, secured through refugee programs as well as other means. American business fears the tap will shut soon.

The Bhutanese were only the latest crop of foreign labor to stand on Case Farms’ chicken lines, slicing breasts and wings for fast-food restaurants and grocery stores across the country. For decades, the company had largely relied on Mayan immigrants fleeing violence in Guatemala, many of whom were not allowed to work in the United States. Case Farms’ history with the Mayans reveals how U.S. companies subvert immigration laws to take advantage of undocumented immigrants, but it also illustrates a broader — and perhaps underappreciated — truth about the American economy: So much of it depends on a never-ending global scramble for low-skilled labor.

President Donald Trump rode into office vowing to restrict the flow of refugees and unauthorized immigrants. The rhetoric played well among Rust Belt voters who had seen their industries decline just as Latino immigrants began arriving to take jobs they didn’t want, seemingly transforming the towns they used to know. But Trump’s efforts to make good on those promises could substantially disrupt the companies that provide America’s food, build its homes, and supply workers to clean hotels and office buildings and unload shipping containers for retail stores.

Just as technology firms and hospitals have come to rely on high-skilled immigrants secured through visa programs, low-wage industries depend heavily on migrants from the world’s hotspots, secured through refugee programs as well as other means. That reliance has prompted some of the nation’s meatpackers to fear that under Trump the global marketplace may shut down, resulting in labor shortages that, they say, will drive up prices and reduce food supplies. “A legal immigration system that works is the best way to address illegal immigration,” Cargill chief executive David MacLennan wrote recently. “We must not close our minds or our borders.”

Poultry and meatpacking companies have long drawn labor from the bottom rung of society. Jurgis Rudkus, the hero of Upton Sinclair’s “The Jungle” was a new Lithuanian immigrant. As processing plants moved out of union-heavy cities closer to farms, they relied on poor, rural whites and, after the country desegregated, African Americans. By 2006, 46 percent of meat and poultry processing workers were Hispanic. In recent years, slaughterhouses have turned to refugees, from Bosnians in Iowa to Somalis in Kansas. Tyson Foods is based in Springdale, Arkansas, which has become home to thousands from the Marshall Islands who hold special status because of nuclear weapons testing during the Cold War.

Case Farms managers told ProPublica they are careful to follow immigration law and say they treat workers properly, wherever they are from.

When Case Farms started in Winesburg in 1986, it mostly employed young Amish women, but they left as the company expanded and hired workers from Rust Belt cities nearby. Its second plant in Morganton, North Carolina, also had trouble staffing its lines. At the time, manufacturing was thriving in the Southeast and the white and African-American workers the company had employed — even the Hmong refugees who settled there after the Vietnam War — left for better-paying jobs at local furniture factories.

President Donald Trump rode into office vowing to restrict the flow of refugees and unauthorized immigrants. The rhetoric played well among Rust Belt voters who had seen their industries decline just as Latino immigrants began arriving to take jobs they didn’t want, seemingly transforming the towns they used to know.

So Case Farms joined others in the industry in a search for Latino workers, recruiting along the Texas border and in farm labor towns in Florida. The number of Latinos working in the poultry and meatpacking industry grew exponentially in the 1990s. The North American Free Trade Agreement played a role by eliminating steep agricultural tariffs, which caused chicken exports to Mexico to more than sextuple and, according to some critics, devastated Mexican farmers, leading many to seek work across the border.

Case Farms eventually found the Mayans, who began settling in Morganton in the early 1990s, and a few years later started arriving around Winesburg. Case Farms recruited many of them directly from Florida, but a Guatemalan pastor I met in Ohio said the company gave him a 15-passenger van to transport immigrants from its plant in Morganton to work at its plant in Ohio. The recruitment and migrant stream that followed turned Rust Belt cities in the Appalachian foothills into immigrant gateways that now claim some of the largest populations of Awakateko and Ixil speakers in the United States.

As the Mayan workers gained strength, eventually unionizing and going on strike, the company recruited a series of immigrant groups — Cubans, Romanians, Chinese, North Africans and Burmese — seemingly pitting immigrant communities against each other.

In one instance, some employees told the National Labor Relations Board that the human resources manager promised Case Farms would give everyone a raise if they could help him get the newcomers to sign papers decertifying the union, which was led by Guatemalans. The Burmese initially refused through a translator, one employee said. So the employee and a colleague waited until the translator left and explained the deal to a new worker who spoke a little English. “She asked me, ‘Oh, more money?’” the woman told the NLRB. “And I said, ‘Yes, more money.’ Afterward, she said something in her language to the rest and everyone signed the little pieces of paper to get rid of the union.”

The Burmese didn’t last long, and for a while, it seemed the Bhutanese might not either.

The Bhutanese began arriving in Akron in 2008, settling in a neighborhood that had been home to Italian and Polish immigrants before them. They had been living in U.N. camps in Nepal since the early 1990s, when the small kingdom of Bhutan in the Himalayas began expelling tens of thousands of ethnic Nepalis, viewing them as a threat.

Manorath Khanal works at Case Farms in human resources and has recruited scores of Bhutanese to work there. I met him at his apartment in Cuyahoga Falls. It was the end of the Hindu holiday Diwali and he wore garlands of orange and purple flowers. Khanal, 42, recalled that when he was a teenager in Bhutan, soldiers entered his village and began arresting people, who were never seen again. One night at midnight, his family fled, crossing the swollen rivers near the border in India, and got into the back of a big truck that took them to Nepal.

He became a leader in the refugee camp and helped negotiate resettlement in the United States. Eventually, Khanal was flown to Phoenix, where he worked cleaning airplanes, before moving in 2012 to Ohio, where Case Farms hired him as a trainer in Winesburg. There weren’t many Bhutanese in the plant at the time, and retention was bad. Khanal told me he was brought in to help the company communicate with the Bhutanese workers and address concerns. “We don’t have enough good supervisors on the production floor,” Khanal said. “They hardly understand what is the meaning of being human, what is humanity, what is respect, what is motivation.”

Manorath Khanal works at Case Farms in human resources and has recruited scores of Bhutanese to work there. I met him at his apartment in Cuyahoga Falls. It was the end of the Hindu holiday Diwali and he wore garlands of orange and purple flowers. Khanal, 42, recalled that when he was a teenager in Bhutan, soldiers entered his village and began arresting people, who were never seen again.

As the labor market and the flow of immigrants have tightened, Case Farms appears to be making an effort to hold on to the ones it has. The company now gives workers a day off for Diwali. It helps underwrite the Bhutanese association’s office in Akron as well as an annual cultural celebration and soccer tournament. At the national convention of Bhutanese organizations in 2013, two of the three speakers on the entrepreneurship panel were from Case Farms. Conditions are improving, Khanal said, but workers tell him they’re treated differently when he’s not there.

A Bhutanese human resources assistant named Upendra Luitel said some things the company does make him uncomfortable. “Most of the employees, they are having some kind of hurt in their hands,” he said. Yet workers have to pay to replace wet gloves, he said, even though the moisture makes their hands cold, increasing the pain. Last year, Luitel said, the company started giving disciplinary points to workers who called in sick — even if they had a doctor’s note.

Case Farms said they instituted the rule because workers had abused a more lenient policy regarding absences.

Back at the apartment, Gambhir Rai, the man who lost his finger, showed me how the saw blade severed his left pinkie at the knuckle and skidded over his ring and middle fingers. “At the time, I’m new in everything, I’m new in America,” he said, explaining that he didn’t know what to do after the 2014 accident. Rai, 35, said he received about $4,000 in workers’ compensation for his finger in addition to weekly checks while he was out of work.

He returned to the plant but quit in February, tired of the long commute and what he felt was ill treatment. Rai said many Bhutanese are happy to have the work at Case Farms when they first arrive, figuring they’ll work there for a short time while getting settled. “Anywhere we work, we love to do our job, we work hard,” he said. “Everybody worries about the job and the future.”

Rai now works at an auto parts warehouse in Akron, which has begun hiring in the Bhutanese community. It’s much different than Case Farms, he said, raising the question — as many worker advocates do — whether the low-wage labor shortage stems from a lack of refugees or simply a lack of respect. “They don’t say, ‘You’re not working this way. You’re not doing good,’” he said. “I get the response, ‘You’re a good worker. You’re a hard worker. You’ve done a lot.’ At Case Farms, I never get like that.”

                                                                                                                           —Courtesy: ProPublica

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Latest world news

Jamaat, BNP supporters clash in Dhaka as Bangladesh votes in 13th parliamentary polls

Clashes erupted in Dhaka’s Mirpur as Bangladesh voted in its 13th parliamentary elections, marking the first polls after Sheikh Hasina’s ouster.

Published

on

bangladesh protest

Clashes broke out between supporters of Jamaat-e-Islami and the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) in Dhaka’s Mirpur-10 constituency as Bangladesh voted in its 13th parliamentary elections on Thursday.

Jamaat-e-Islami chief Shafiqur Rahman is contesting from the Mirpur-10 seat. Polling is being conducted for 299 seats in the Jatiya Sangsad, Bangladesh’s parliament.

Voting details and electoral process

Voting began at 7.30 am local time (7 am IST) under the first-past-the-post system. Results are expected to start coming in by evening.

Out of the 300 parliamentary constituencies, polling in Sherpur-3 has been cancelled following the death of a candidate. A total of 12.77 crore registered voters are eligible to cast their ballots. The majority mark in the 299-seat contest stands at 150.

In addition to these seats, 50 positions in the Jatiya Sangsad are reserved for women. These members are elected by Members of Parliament through proportional representation using the single transferable vote system.

First polls after Hasina’s ouster

This election marks the first parliamentary contest since former prime minister and Awami League chief Sheikh Hasina was removed from office following massive student protests in August 2024. Her long-time political rival, BNP leader Khaleda Zia, passed away in December the following year.

Hasina and Zia alternated in power from 1991 until Hasina returned to office in 2009. She remained prime minister for over 15 years and 200 days and had won the 2024 elections before being deposed months later.

For the first time in decades, voters are participating in national elections without either of the two dominant political figures shaping the contest.

Changing political landscape

With the Awami League excluded from participating due to its crackdown during the student protests, the political space has shifted significantly.

Tarique Rahman, son of Khaleda Zia, returned to Bangladesh in December after nearly 17 years in exile. The 60-year-old has emerged as a frontrunner for the prime minister’s post, drawing on the support base of the BNP and his late mother.

Jamaat-e-Islami, once allied with the BNP, is now leading its own coalition. It has secured backing from the National Citizen Party, a student and Gen-Z platform that emerged from the anti-Hasina protests.

Referendum on July National Charter

Alongside the general election, voters are also participating in a referendum on the July National Charter. The charter has been agreed upon by the Muhammad Yunus-led interim government and several political parties.

Key proposals in the charter include limiting prime ministers to two terms or 10 years, creating an upper House of parliament, and restoring the caretaker government system to oversee elections for 90 days to ensure free and fair polls.

Regional implications

The outcome of the election is expected to influence regional dynamics involving India, China and Pakistan.

Bangladesh had been seen as closer to India during Sheikh Hasina’s tenure. However, there has been a shift towards Beijing and Islamabad in recent times. Relations between India and Bangladesh have reportedly been tense under the Yunus-led interim arrangement.

Among the two principal contenders, the BNP is considered relatively more inclined towards New Delhi than Jamaat-e-Islami.

India is also monitoring the situation amid reports of attacks on minorities and killings of Hindus following Hasina’s ouster. Authorities have expressed concerns about potential violence on polling day.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Donald Trump calls India trade deal historic, highlights rise in US coal exports

Donald Trump describes the India trade deal as historic and links it to rising US coal exports, while India reiterates national interest in energy decisions.

Published

on

Donald Trump

US President Donald Trump has described the recent trade agreement with India as “historic”, saying it has contributed to a sharp rise in American coal exports.

Speaking at the Champion of Coal Event on Wednesday, Trump said the United States has strengthened its position as the world’s leading energy producer and is rapidly expanding its footprint as an energy exporter.

He said that trade deals signed in recent months with countries including Japan, South Korea and India have helped increase coal exports from the US.

“America is now the number one energy producer in the world. We’re becoming a massive energy exporter. In just the past few months, we’ve made historic trade deals with Japan, Korea, India, and others to increase our coal exports dramatically. The quality of our coal is supposed to be the finest anywhere in the world,” Trump said.

He also asserted that American coal is considered among the best globally in terms of quality.

India says national interest will guide energy choices

Meanwhile, on February 9, Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri said that India’s energy-related decisions will continue to be guided by national interest.

During a special briefing by the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), Misri underlined that India’s energy policy is driven by adequate availability, fair pricing and reliable supply. His remarks came amid reports suggesting that India may be reducing its oil imports from Russia.

Clarifying how energy sourcing decisions are made, Misri said procurement is handled by oil companies based on prevailing market conditions. These companies assess availability, risks, pricing and logistical considerations while following internal accountability and fiduciary processes.

“As far as the actual sourcing of energy is concerned, this is undertaken by oil companies, which make decisions based on market conditions. They assess availability, evaluate risks, analyse costs, and follow their internal accountability processes and fiduciary responsibilities. At any given time, there is a complex matrix of considerations, including financial and logistical aspects, that these companies must take into account,” he said.

He added that both government and business decisions in the energy sector would continue to prioritise national interest.

Misri also noted that India remains a net importer of oil and gas and, as a developing economy, must remain mindful of resource availability and the inflationary impact of import dependence.

Continue Reading

India News

Piyush Goyal lauds USA’s fabulous effort against India in T20 World Cup

Piyush Goyal praised the US cricket team’s performance against India in the T20 World Cup, calling it fabulous despite the defeat and making a light-hearted remark on tariffs.

Published

on

Piyush goel

Union Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal on Monday praised the United States cricket team for their performance against India in the ongoing T20 World Cup, saying the side played “fabulously” despite losing the match.

Goyal made the remarks while responding to light-hearted comments by US Ambassador Sergio Gor at a reception hosted by the diplomat. Both were present at the India-USA T20 World Cup match played on Saturday.

Speaking at the event, the minister acknowledged the rapid progress made by the US cricket team in recent years. He also joked that trade policy might have changed the match’s outcome.

“The US may not have won the match, but for a country which has not known cricket and has started playing only a few years ago, the performance was fabulous,” Goyal said.

Referring to Ambassador Gor’s comments, he added humorously that if the US had made reciprocal tariffs zero, “you would possibly have won the match”.

India seal first win of the tournament

India registered their first victory of the tournament with a 29-run win over the USA. After being asked to bat first, India posted 161 for nine in their allotted 20 overs.

Suryakumar Yadav anchored the innings with an unbeaten 84 off 49 balls, hitting 10 fours and four sixes. Ishan Kishan contributed 20 off 16 deliveries, while Tilak Varma added 25 off 16 balls.

For the USA, Shadley van Schalkwyk returned figures of 4 for 29, while Harmeet Singh picked up two wickets for 26 runs.

USA fall short in chase

Chasing 162, the USA were restricted to 132 for eight, falling short by 29 runs.

Milind Kumar scored 34 off 34 balls, while Sanjay Krishnamurthi (37 off 31) and Shubham Ranjane (37 off 22) provided resistance in the middle order.

India’s bowlers shared the spoils, with Mohammed Siraj taking three wickets for 29 runs. Axar Patel and Arshdeep Singh chipped in with two wickets each.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com